• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제31권2호
• /
• pp.237-269
• /
• 2016

Asia-Pacific Space Cooperation Organization (APSCO) is the only intergovernmental space cooperation organization in Asia. Since its establishment to date, eight countries have signed the convention and become member states. South Korea participated actively in the preparatory phase of creating the organization, and one conference organized by AP-MCSTA which is the predecessor of APSCO was held in South Korea. However, after the APSCO Convention was opened for signature in 2005 to date, South Korea does not ratify the Convention and become a member. The rapid development of space commercialization and privatization, as well as the fastest growing commercial space market in Asia, provides opportunities for Asian countries to cooperate with each other in relevant space fields. And to participate in the existing cooperation framework (e.g., the APSCO) by the Asian space countries (e.g., South Korea) could be a proper choice. Even if the essential cooperation in particular space fields is challenging, joint space programs among different Asian countries for dealing with the common events can be initiated at the first steps. Since APSCO has learned the successful legal arrangements from ESA, the legal measures established by its Convention are believed to be qualified to ensure the achievement of benefits of different member states. For example, the regulation of the "fair return" principle confirms that the return of interests from the relevant programs is in proportion to the member's investment in the programs. Moreover, the distinguish of basic and optional activities intends to authorize the freedom of the members to choose programs to participate. And for the voting procedure, the acceptance of the "consensus" by the Council is in favor of protecting the member's interest when making decisions. However, political factors that are potential to block the participation of South Korea in APSCO are difficult to be ignored. A recent event is an announcement of deploying THAAD by South Korea, which causes tension between South Korea and China. The cooperation between these two states in space activities will be influenced. A long-standing barrier is that China acts as a non-member of the main international export control mechanism, i.e., the MTCR. The U.S takes this fact as the main reason to prevent South Korea to cooperate with China in developing space programs. Although the political factors that will block the participation of South Korea in APSCO are not easy to removed shortly, legal measures can be taken to reduce the political influence. More specifically, APSCO is recommended to ensure the achievement of commercial interests of different cooperation programs by regulating precisely the implementation of the "fair return" principle. Furthermore, APSCO is also suggested to contribute to managing the common regional events by sharing satellite data. And it is anticipated that these measures can effectively response the requirements of the rapid development of space commercialization and the increasing common needs of Asia, thereby to provide a platform for the further cooperation. In addition, in order to directly reduce the political influence, two legal measures are necessary to be taken: Firstly, to clarify the rights and responsibilities of the host state (i.e., China) as providing assistance, coordination and services to the management of the Organization to release the worries of the other member states that the host state will control the Organization's activities. And secondly, to illustrate that the cooperation in APSCO is for the non-military purpose (a narrow sense of "peaceful purpose") to reduce the political concerns. Regional cooperation in Asia regarding space affairs is considered to be a general trend in the future, so if the participation of South Korea in APSCO can be finally proved to be feasible, there will be an opportunity to discuss the creation of a comprehensive institutionalized framework for space cooperation in Asia.

• 한국수자원학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국수자원학회 2016년도 학술발표회
• /
• pp.1-1
• /
• 2016

Many of the world's large ecosystems are severely stressed due to population growth, water quality and quantity problems, vulnerability to flood and drought, and the loss of native species and cultural resources. Consequences of climate change further increase uncertainties about the future. These major societal challenges must be addressed through innovations in governance, policy, and ways of implementing management strategies. Science and engineering play a critical role in helping define possible alternative futures that could be achieved and the possible consequences to economic development, quality of life, and sustainability of ecosystem services. Science has advanced rapidly during the past decade with the emergence of science communities coalescing around 'Grand Challenges' and the maturation of how these communities function has resulted in large interdisciplinary research networks. An example is the River Experiment Center of KICT that engages researchers from throughout Korea and the world. This trend has been complemented by major advances in sensor technologies and data synthesis to accelerate knowledge discovery. These factors combine to allow scientific debate to occur in a more open and transparent manner. The availability of information and improved communication of scientific and engineering issues is raising the level of dialogue at the science-policy interface. However, severe challenges persist since scientific discovery does not occur on the same timeframe as management actions, policy decisions or at the pace sometimes expected by elected officials. Common challenges include the need to make decisions in the face of considerable uncertainty, ensuring research results are actionable and preventing science being used by special interests to delay or obsfucate decisions. These challenges are explored in the context of examples from the United States, including the California Bay-Delta system. California transfers water from the wetter northern part of the state to the drier southern part of the state through the Central Valley Project since 1940 and this was supplemented by the State Water Project in 1973. The scale of these activities is remarkable: approximately two thirds of the population of Californians rely on water from the Delta, these waters also irrigate up to 45% of the fruits & vegetables produced in the US, and about 80% of California's commercial fishery species live in or migrate through the Bay-Delta. This Delta region is a global hotspot for biodiversity that provides habitat for over 700 species, but is also a hotspot for the loss of biodiversity with more than 25 species currently listed by the Endangered Species Act. Understanding the decline of the fragile ecosystem of the Bay-Delta system and the potential consequences to economic growth if water transfers are reduced for the environment, the California State Legislature passed landmark legislation in 2009 (CA Water Code SS 85054) that established "Coequal goals of providing a more reliable water supply for California and protecting, restoring, and enhancing the Delta ecosystem". The legislation also stated that "The coequal goals shall be achieved in a manner that protects and enhances the unique cultural, recreational, natural resource, and agricultural values of the Delta as an evolving place." The challenges of integrating policy, management and scientific research will be described through this and other international examples.

• 국제지역연구
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.81-110
• /
• 2018

본 논문에서는 삼차원게임이론의 논리 구조를 통해 지역경제통합체, 즉 유럽연합의 통상 협상 전략 및 협상력을 분석하였다. 삼차원게임이론에서는 협상자가 각 면 게임의 경계에 서서 게임을 동시에 운용해 나아가면서, 각 방향으로부터 제약을 받거나 때때로 제약을 기회로 활용하는 등 삼중 측면의 협상 전략이 상존함을 강조하였다. 삼차원게임이론에 대한 연구는 지역연합이 협상의 주체로서 등장하여 국제레벨, 지역레벨 및 회원국레벨의 의견을 조율하고, 이해관계를 조정하는 과정을 체계화하기 위한 목적을 가진다. 본 연구에서는 최근 체결된 EU-일본 EPA(Economic Partnership Agreement) 협상과정을 사례로 한-EU FTA 사례와 비교 분석하여, 지역경제협력체의 FTA 추진 시 적용할 수 있는 삼차원게임이론의 논리를 정리하였다. 또한 본고에서는 지역경제통합체의 통상협상 대상국은 협상에 임할 때 어떠한 전략에 대응할 수 있을 것인가에 관해 분석하였다. EU 지역차원의 통상정책 영역은 기술적 특성으로 정치화되기 어려운 영역에 관한 연합의 배타적 권한화가 이미 완성되었으며, 연합 차원의 정책과정이 정치쟁점으로 드러나지 않아왔던 점 그리고 여론 전달 과정이 더블 스텝 접근 방식인 점 등이 복합되어 그 특성을 형성해 왔다. 결론적으로 EU의 통상영역 정책 과정은 다양한 중앙조직에 의한 권한 배분으로 복잡하고 정교한 과정을 구성한다. 이러한 공동정책 결정과정과 통상 영역의 구조적 특성으로 말미암아 오히려 협상의 메커니즘 역설적으로 단순화되었고, 공동체 차원의 협상력은 높아졌다. 결과적으로 유럽위원회는 국제레벨 단계의 양자간 통상협상에서 매우 강력한 협상 행위자로 기능하게 된다.

• 한국ITS학회 논문지
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.14-26
• /
• 2019

버스운전자의 안전운행을 확보하기 위해서는 운전자 교통사고 원인 등을 분석해 안전운행을 지원 할 수 있는 정책이 뒷받침되어야 한다. 따라서 국토교통부는 사업용 차량에 운전자를 보조하는 첨단 운전자지원시스템 중 전방충돌경고장치, 차선이탈경고장치의 장착의무대상을 단계적으로 확대하는 방안을 마련한 바 있다. 그러나 버스운전자 교통사고분석과 관련된 기초 연구는 국내에서 많이 수행되고 있지 않아, 버스사고예방을 위하여 향후 버스운전자에게 가장 필요한 첨단 운전자지원시스템이 무엇인지에 대한 연구가 필요한 시점이다. 본 연구에서는 버스유형 및 반복사고 여부별 사고심각도를 분석하고 개선방안으로 버스의 첨단 운전자지원시스템 지원 방향을 제시하는데 목적이 있다. 사고심각도 분석은 순서형 로짓 모형을 이용해 분석하였으며 분석결과, 차대사람사고는 모든 모형에서 통계적으로 유의미하게 선정되었고 법규위반항목의 속도위반, 신호위반, 승객을 위한 안전조치위반이 제안된 모형에서 공통적으로 선정되었다. 따라서 향후 버스 대 사람사고를 감소시킬 수 있는 보행자감지시스템, 보행자 자동긴급제어장치의 설치가 반드시 필요하다.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제11권8호
• /
• pp.331-340
• /
• 2013

초현실주의 대표적인 작가 르네마그리트가 주장한 데페이즈망 기법은 여러매체에 활용되어지고 응용되어 왔다. TV, CF, 광고등 다양한 매체를 통하여 데페이즈망의 기법들을 적용한 흔히 사용되어지는 소재들을 새로운 낯선 환경에 재배치되었을때 고정관념의 탈피와 시각적 충격을 통해 흥미를 부여하고자 하였다. 서로 다른 용도의 투명스크린과 오브제를 활용하여 프로젝션 맵핑의 매체에 접목하여 작품 '환영'에 데페이즈망 기법을 적용하여 낯선 환경을 통해 시각적 즐거움과, 새로운 미디어로써의 가능성과 투명스크린과 오브제를 활용한 프로젝션 맵핑의 기법을 제시하였다. 데페이즈망의 기법에서 대표적인 공간의 변조, 모순된 이미지의 결합, 물체의 변형과 변화 3가지 분류에 의해 표현방법과 효과를 적용하여 작품사례를 제시하였고, 레이아웃, 타이포그래피, 이미지, 컬러, 시간으로 분류하여 유형별 분석하였다. 작품 '환영'을 통해 프로젝션 맵핑과 데페이즈망 기법을 활용한 새로운 오브제와 매체의 특성을 적용하여 확장하였다.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제67권
• /
• pp.119-142
• /
• 2015

Many insurers have traditionally incorporated "fraud clauses" into insurance policies, setting out the consequences of making a fraudulent claim. Even in the absence of an express terms, English courts provide insurers with a remedy for a fraudulent claim. However, the law in this area is complex, convoluted and confused. English Law Commission think that the law in this area needs to be reformed for three reasons; (1) the disjunctive between the common law rule and section 17 generates unnecessary disputes and litigation, (2) increasingly, UK commercial law must be justified to an international insurance society, and (3) the rules on fraudulent claims are functioned as a deterrent if they are clear and well-understood. In order for these purposes, English Law Commission recommends a statutory regime to the effect that, when an insured commits fraud in relation to a claim, the insurer should (1) have no liability to pay the fraudulent claim and be able to recover any sums already paid in respect to the claim, and (2) have the option to treat the contract as having been terminated with from the time of the fraudulent act and, if chosen the option, be entitled to refuse all claims arising after the fraud, but (3) remain liable for legitimate losses before the fraudulent act. LC is not recommending a complete restatement of the law on insurance fraud generally. For example, LC does not seek to define fraud, instead, recommends the introduction of targeted provisions to confirm the remedies available to an insurer who discovers a fraud by a policyholder.

• 수산해양교육연구
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.146-167
• /
• 2001

Korea and China are two opposite countries located aside Yellow Sea and co-utilize the East China Sea. The two countries are close together from geological point of view, however, the competitive development of resources was more emphasized than the cooperative development of resources between the two countries because the special policy relationship. Additionally, after the communist government of China was founded in 1949, the political conception between the two countries was quite different. Therefore the establishment of appropriate international fisheries co-operation was impossible, and the international management problems of fisheries resources in Yellow Sea and East China Sea were let alone. UN convention on the Law of the Sea came to force in 1994, Korea and China adopted the exclusive economic zone system in 1996. On the other hand, Fisheries Law in Korea was enacted in 1953 in order to management of fisheries resources, and also China was enacted fisheries law in 1986. The two countries control the fisheries effort through fisheries license system, meanwhile through prohibition fishing area, prohibition fishing period, limitation of net size, and limitation of body length to conserve and manage the fisheries resource. The serious management methods of resource management in the two countries are similar such as the creation of promptly decreased species and those species that have commercial value, discharge of fish seedling stock, settlement of artificial reef and clean of fishing ground. Therefore, the two countries should consider not only the improvement of formal law system, but also how to recover the fisheries resources in circumference water zone and how to improve the efficiency of fisheries resource management. Specially the settlement and management of artificial reef should be chosen in the area that have the highest benefit to two countries, and should establish the common management system of discharge of fish seedling stock. And the two countries should adopt the same criteria through technical management and limitation of net size, limitation of body length, and prohibition area of special fisheries to ensure the highest fisheries benefit of fisherman in the two countries and the highest efficiency of fisheries resource management.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제7권4호
• /
• pp.175-190
• /
• 1998

The formation of Chinese Town in Malacca of Malaysia and Singapore would explain that Chinese gradually played an important role of commerce and urban service according to the Western European advance to southeast Asia and the construction of colonial cities from the 16th century to 19th and massed residence in many cites of southeast Asia. Chinese was usually separated from the Western European by western colonial policy and city planning. Common architectural characteristics in Chinese towns of Malaysia can refer to the transmission of the Chinese architectural material, the combination of dwelling and commerce in a house and the space organization centered on a court or an air well in the narrow and long site, lying adjacent to street etc. The Chinese dwellings in Malaysia rooted with Chinese settlement in southeast Asia. The Chinese dwellings was not always a shop on 1th floor and a dwelling on 2nd floor before the 19th century. But as Chinese immigration and commercial activity progressed in earnest in the early of 19th century, the row house of Chinese for dwelling was autonomously changed to two functional shophouse for dwelling and commerce. Chinese row house can refer to the use of Malay regional material, change of symmetrical Chinese traditional housing type by the narrow and long site and the tendency of the eclectic elevation of Western and China. Another architectural characteristics of the shophouse is an appearance of the continuous verandah with a cover regulated by Stamford Raffles in Singapore. This regulation was applied to architecture in Chinese Town as Stamford Raffles constructed Singapore. It was spread to South China reversely and became the regulation of streetscape for the modern city. Shophouse of Chinese towns in Southeast Asia and south China can be understood by context of Chinese immigration, colonialism, housing type of commerce and dwelling and the Western European city planning.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.351-359
• /
• 2018

본 연구의 목적은 윤리 의식의 학제적 융합적 적용을 통해, 광고 표현에서의 '그림자에 의한 실체의 잠식 현상' 제거 필요성을 환기시키는데 있다. 정성적 접근을 통해, 광고 표현이 윤리 의식에 대한 충분한 고려 없이 가시적 성과 중심으로 기획, 집행될 경우, 목표 달성의 단기적 효율성은 높일 수 있지만, 의도치 않은 '그림자의 부메랑 현상'을 이끌어 내기 쉽고, 이는 소비자의 윤리적 방어기제를 환기시켜, 결국 '그림자에 의한 실체의 잠식 현상'을 유발할 수 있음을 제시하고 있다. 결론적으로 본 연구는, 첫째, 자본주의 사회에서의 상업적 이윤 추구가 공동체 사회에서의 윤리 의식 공감대 확보를 전제로 진행되어야 하며, 둘째, 윤리 의식의 교육, 공유, 실천, 및 확인 과정이 통합적으로 전제될 때, 기업은 이윤 추구라는 미시 실용적 목적과 사회와의 생태적 교감이라는 거시 환경적 목적을 병행 달성할 수 있게 되고, 이는 장기적인 측면에서 기업의 지속가능 경영의 토대가 될 것임을 제시하고 있다.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.35-54
• /
• 1998

In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the number of large-scale projects involving construction, public works and the installation of industrial plants. These projects usually require the participation of a number of public and private entities and involve more than one contract. When disputes arising in connection with these projects are to be submitted to commercial arbitration, the parties often wish to have all disputes decided by one arbitral tribunal, in a single comprehensive proceeding. It has become apparent that the resolution of all major disputes which may arise in connection with such a project in a single comprehensive arbitration proceeding presents a number of advantages. The arbitral institution can provide for a multiparty arbitration proceeding only where all of the parties have agreed to it either at the time the disputes arise or at the time the parties enter into their various contractual arrangement. The discussion about multiparty arbitration centers on the question whether courts should have the power to order the consolidation of arbitration proceedings absent the consent of the parties. As the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly denied certiorari to cases presenting the consolidation-question, the conflict between the Court of Appeals' positions remains. The common method of selection in a bilaterial proceeding is the formula by which each party appoints one arbitrator and the two party-chosen arbitrators then mutually agree on a third, neutral arbitrator. This popular method poses, however, both a policy and practical problems In a 3-party-proceeding. It seems that the better solution is to have courts or arbitral institutions appoint all arbitrators for a multiparty proceeding. American courts have employed a variety of methods to appoint arbitrators for multiparty disputes in cases in which the parties had not provided for or could not agree upon a method themselves.