• Title/Summary/Keyword: Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces

Search Result 1, Processing Time 0.014 seconds

The Relationship between Sovereignty and Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, Military administration & command (주권과 국군통수권의 관계 및 병정관계에 관한 연구)

  • Kim, Sung Woo
    • Convergence Security Journal
    • /
    • v.13 no.5
    • /
    • pp.67-75
    • /
    • 2013
  • South Korea suggest that the United States government should delay the date to hand over wartime operational control (OPCON). It is fixed on December 1, 2015. Typically the president's position as head of the executive authority is coming from the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces. Now we should know the commander-in-chief of the nation's forces and the meaning of OPCON. The relationship between sovereignty and the commander-in-chief of the nation's forces is a little different. This is one of the efforts to enlarge the efficiency of Armed Forces. Of course, operational control is little control of the sovereign personnel, logistics, administration, discipline, organizing, training, etc. It does not control all matters. The current ROK Combined Forces Command itself is made with reference to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization(NATO). If we insist our own sovereignty is infringed because of OPCON, that claim is coated in irreparable damage to the national interest.