• 제목/요약/키워드: Claren

검색결과 4건 처리시간 0.021초

수종 치아미백제가 구강내에서 법랑질의 미세경도에 미치는 영향 (The Effects of Tooth Bleaching Agents on Microhardness of Enamel in situ)

  • 박윤우;박세희;김진우;조경모
    • Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
    • /
    • 제31권6호
    • /
    • pp.470-476
    • /
    • 2006
  • 본 연구는 치아미백용 2.6% hydrogen peroxide 부착대와 통상 home bleaching용으로 안전하다고 알려진 10% carbamide peroxide 미백젤이 법랑질 미세경도에 미치는 영향을 미백을 하지 않은 경우와 비교, 평가하기위하여 시행되었다. 최근에 발거한 사람의 상악 절치 20개를 사용하여 가로, 세로 2 mm의 정사각형 치아편을 각 치아에서 3개씩 절단, 채득한 후 교정용 bracket에 고정하여 시편을 제작하였다. 자원자는 20명을 선정하였고, 각각의 자원자의 치아에 동일 치아에서 제작한 시편이 부착된 bracket을 순면 중앙에 부착하였으며 상악 우측 측절치에 젤을 이용한 군 (Opalescence tooth whitening gel, Ultradent Product Inc, South Jordan, USA), 상악 우측 중절치에 미백을 하지 않은 대조군, 상악 좌측 중절치에 부착대를 이용한 군 (Claren, LG Household & Health Care, Seoul, Korea)을 부착 시켰다. 젤을 이용한 군은 bracket이 부착된 치아에 맞게 상악 우측 측절치부터 우측 소구치까지를 덮는 mouthguard tray를 제작하여 매일 동일시간에 2시간씩 14일 동안 미백을 시행하였으며, 대조군은 부착 28일 동안 미백 치료 없이 구강 내에 위치시켰다. 부착대를 이용한 군은 bracket의 시편을 덮을 수 있는 크기로 상악용 Claren을 절단하여 오전, 오후 각각 30분씩 하루 두 번 부착하여 14일 동안 미백을 시행하였다. 각군 모두 bracket부착 전, 미백 14일 후, 재광화 14일 후의 미세경도를 측정하였으며 측정된 값을 이용하여 미세경도 변화 양상과 변화량을 비교 평가하였다. 치아미백용 2.6% hydrogen peroxide 부착대와 젤 형태의 10% carbamide peroxide 미백제의 미백 전, 미백후, 재광화 후 미세경도 변화 양상이 미백을 하지 않은 대조군과 차이를 보이지 않았으며 (p > 0.05) 미백 전과 미백 후의 미세경도의 차이 미백후와 재광화 후의 미세경도의 차이도 유의할 만한 차이가 없었다 (p > 0.05). 따라서 시중에 판매되고 있는 whitening strip과 미백 젤은 14일 동안의 통상적인 미백과정 동안 법랑질의 미세경도에 영향을 미치지 않는 것으로 사료된다.

The effect of various commercially available bleaching agents on the microshear bond strength of composite resin to enamel

  • Chang, Hoon-Sang;Cho, Kyung-Mo;Kim, Jin-Woo
    • Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
    • /
    • 제29권3호
    • /
    • pp.219-225
    • /
    • 2004
  • This study evaluated the microshear bond strength of composte resin to teeth bleached with commercial whitening strips and compared with those bleached with home bleaching gel. Twelve extracted human central incisors were cut into pieces and central four segments were chosen from each tooth and embedded in acrylic resin. Four blocks with 12 tooth segments embedded in acrylic resin were acquired and numbered from group one to group four. Group 1 was bleached with Crest Whitestrips, group 2 with Claren, group 3 with Opalescence tooth whitening gel (10% carbamide peroxide). Group 4 was used as control. The bleaching procedure was conducted for 14 days according to the manufacturer's instructions ; the bleaching strips twice a day for 30 min and the bleaching gel once a day for 2hr. After bleaching, composite resin (Filtek Supreme) was bonded to the enamel surfaces with a self-etching adhesive (Adper Prompt L-Pop) using Tygon tube. Microshear bond strength was tested with a universal testing machine (EZ-test). The data were statistically analysed by one-way ANOVA. The study resulted in no statistical differences in microshear bond strength between the tooth segments bleached with 2 different whitening strips and bleaching gel. It can be concluded that the effect of bleaching with either commercial whitening strips or bleaching gel on enamel is minimal in bonding with self-etching adhesive to composite resin.

Effect of commercially available bleaching agents on microshear bond strength of composite resin to enamel

  • Chang, Hoon-Sang;Cho, Kyong-Mo;Kim, Jin-Woo
    • 대한치과보존학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 대한치과보존학회 2003년도 제120회 추계학술대회 제 5차 한ㆍ일 치과보존학회 공동학술대회
    • /
    • pp.573-573
    • /
    • 2003
  • I. Objective This study evaluated the microshear bond strength of teeth bleached with commercial whitening strips and compared with those bleached with home bleaching gel. II. Materials and Methods Twelve exrtacted central incisors were cut into pieces and central four segments were chosen from each tooth and embedded in acrylic resin. Four blocks with 12 tooth segments embedded in acrylic resin were acquired and numbered from one to four. Block 1 was bleached with Crest Whitestrips, block 2 with Claren, block 3 with Opalescence tooth whitening gel(10% carbamide peroxide).(omitted)

  • PDF

환경교육에서의 Hungerford적 '책임있는 환경행동'에 관한 논의 (A Critique of the Critiques of Hungerford's 'Responsible Environmental Behavior' in Environmental Education)

  • 김경옥
    • 한국환경교육학회지:환경교육
    • /
    • 제15권1호
    • /
    • pp.51-67
    • /
    • 2002
  • There are some critiques of Hungerford's "responsible environmental behavior" for misinterpreting or misunderstanding the term of "behavior". Most critics such as Wals and van der Leij, Jae-Young Lee misunderstood that Hungeford and his colleagues' approach to environmental education is a sort of behaviorism which is not correct. The writer corrected them by showing the successful story of the IEEIA program from the teachers, the children, and the community members digging by the foot. The IEEIA program represents his philosophy of education which can be characterized a non-behaviorist by Wals and van der Leij, if we attempt to classify all educators as behaviorist and non-behaviorist. And the writer also criticized the critiques with the well known "professional environmental educators" in the North America who have known Hungerford's ideas in environmental education well such as Roth, McClaren, Ramsey and Hungeford himself. Ramsey and Hungeford himself.

  • PDF