• 동남아시아연구
• /
• 제28권2호
• /
• pp.181-212
• /
• 2018

2017년 두테르테 정부는 집권 2년차를 맞아 보다 강력하게 치안 유지를 위한 정책을 폈으며, 아세안의장국으로서 자주적인 외교를 표방하였다. 마약과의 전쟁을 계속하였고 아울러 부패 공직자에 대한 처벌을 통해 자신의 정치적 입지를 높이려 하였다. 또한 무슬림 테러조직인 마우테 그룹의 소탕을 이유로 민다나오 지역에 계엄령을 선포하고 대외적으로도 대테러 공조를 강화하였다. 또한 집권초기 화해 제스처를 취하고 평화협상도 추진했던 공산반군과는, 일련의 유혈사태로 인하여 평화 기조를 종결하고 진압작전을 시작하였다. 여전히 높은 지지도에 힘입어 강력한 드라이브를 걸고 있지만 사회경제적으로 낮은 계층과 소수집단들이 점점 소외됨으로써 일종의 불안 요인이 되고 있다. 아세안의장국으로서 두테르테 정부는 기존의 확고한 우방인 미국과도 일정한 거리를 두는 반면, 실질적인 경제적 이익을 취할 수 있는 중국이나 러시아와는 친밀도를 높이는 방향으로 선회하였다. 외부 경제적 지원을 다각화하고 안으로는 세수를 증대하는 정책을 통해 인프라 확립을 우선 과제로 선정했다. 높은 경제성장률을 보이고 있는 필리핀이 확고한 인프라 확립에 대한 기대감도 크지만, 전통적으로 외부 자원에 의존하여 외채 부담을 늘렸던 전철을 밞지 않기 위해서는 세제 개혁이 성공적으로 마무리될 수 있어야할 것으로 보인다. 한국의 신남방정책은 두테르테 자주외교 정책과 접점을 찾는 것이 필요해 보이며, 인프라 개발에 한국 정부나 기업의 효율적인 협력 방안을 모색하는 것도 향후 과제가 될 것이다.

• 동양고전연구
• /
• 제73호
• /
• pp.153-184
• /
• 2018

이 논문은 효종조에 실시된 행전책의 성과와 한계를 분석하기 위한 목적으로 작성되었다. 이를 위해 효종 연간 김육을 중심으로 추진했던 행전책을 담고 있는 사목(事目)을 살펴보았다. 1650년(효종 1년) 시장에 추포가 화폐로 유통되는 문제를 제어하기 위한 추포금단(?布禁斷) 조치가 내려졌다. 여기에는 추포가 물가를 교란시키고 있다는 표면적 이유와 더불어 국폐(國幣)에 준하는 면포를 유통시키기 위한 목적이 있었다. 이를 통해 국가는 유통화폐 통제력을 강화하여 동전유통 정책의 추진력을 확보고자 했다. 1651년(효종 2년) 추포에 대한 단속과 동시에 서로(西路)에 대한 행전책(行錢策)을 실시했다. 행전의 명목은 흉년에 진휼을 위한 재원 확보와 국가 재원의 충원이었다. 서로행전(西路行錢)의 성과에 따라 행전권을 확대하기 위해 경중행전(京中行錢)을 위한 사목이 마련되었다. 사목은 시장에서 동전으로 물건을 거래하는 것은 물론 관청에서도 동전을 사용하도록 강제 하는 내용이었다. 이를 통해 국가 주도의 행전책에 대한 시장의 신인도를 높임과 동시에 정책적 강제성을 담보하려 했다. 행전 확대 정책은 동전공급의 문제로 한계에 직면했다. 1652년(효종 3년) 기전행전(畿甸行錢)과 함께 전세에 대한 전납(錢納)이 시도되었다. 그러나 동철(銅鐵) 부족으로 인한 주전제한으로 행전의 의려움이 있었다. 그에 따라 1655년(효종 6년) 행전사목을 수정 한 경정과조(更定科條)가 제정되었다. 이 사목은 동전의 가치를 미(米)와 은(銀)을 기준으로 책정하고 환전(換錢)을 위한 점포를 널리 설치하는 내용이었다. 이러한 정책은 국가에서 동전 유통을 강제하고 이를 통해 안정적인 재원을 확보하려는 목적이었다. 1656년(효종 7년) 시장에서 동전 유통의 한계와 전납을 위한 동전 공급과 확보의 제약이라는 문제점이 중첩되어 '파전(罷錢)'에 이르렀다. 효종조 김육을 중심으로 추진된 행전책은 시장에서 동전이 유통되는 경험을 축적함과 동시에 정책적 시행착오를 확보하는 성과가 있었다. 이러한 점이 1678년 동전이 전국적으로 유통될 수 있었던 배경 중 하나로 작용했다고 볼 수 있다. 다만, 효종 재위기의 정책 방향이 시장이 아닌 국가의 재정 확보와 보전에 있었다는 점은 전면적인 행전을 제약하는 한계 중 하나로 작용하였다. 이 시기 청나라의 갈등에 따라 북벌(北伐)을 대비하기 위한 재정이 요구되었기 때문이었다.

• 대순사상논총
• /
• 제44집
• /
• pp.177-212
• /
• 2023

본 연구에서는 공동체에서의 문화 다양성에 대한 억압을 탐구했다. 먼저 그동안 수행한 연구와 최근의 변화를 토대로 중국 정부와 소수민족 사이에 존재하는 억압을 고찰했다. 보이는 억압에서는 한어 교육의 확대, 소수민족 언어의 제재를 비롯하여 소수민족의 정체성이 배제된 고등교육의 확대를 언급했다. 보이지 않는 억압에서는 도시화, 현대화를 앞세운 도시개발, 중앙정부의 교육을 받은 소수민족 출신 간부의 활용 등을 거론했다. 이어서 유럽에 맞선 라틴아메리카의 억압과 저항에 주목했다. 왜냐하면 라틴아메리카는 문화 다양성의 억압을 중국 소수민족 보다 먼저 경험하고, 이를 이론으로 성숙시켰기 때문이다. 그러므로 라틴아메리카 지식인들의 고민과 경험은 중국 소수민족의 미래와 자신을 변호할 이론으로 가공되는 데 참고할 점이 많다. 물론 중국 소수민족 공동체의 문제에는 특수성이 있다. 그러나 라틴아메리카에서의 경험과 자아 비판적 연구는 중국 소수민족 공동체의 특수성을 확장시켜 생각할 단초이다. 특히 유럽에 의해 문화적으로 잠식되어 스스로 창조할 수 없는 지경에 이른 라틴 아메리카의 상황과 점차 닮아가기 때문이다. 궁극적으로 본 연구를 통해 우리 공동체는 어떠한지 그리고 바람직한 공동체는 어떠해야 하는지 되돌아보고 싶었다. 중국 소수민족의 실태와 라틴아메리카의 억압과 저항을 통해 우리의 민낯을 되돌아보고, 바람직한 공동체가 추구할 현실적 방안을 찾고자 했다. 라틴아메리카 학자들의 주장처럼 인식의 전환은 필요하다. 더하여 다양성과 자유에 대한 성찰, 상호 존중의 마음, 중국의 상황에 기초한 화이부동의 자세도 중요하다. 결국 공동체에서의 문화 다양성과 억압의 문제는 중국 소수민족 공동체와 라틴아메리카의 선주민뿐만 아니라 미국의 아시아인, 한국에서의 외국인 문제로 확장되어, 다양한 구성원으로 만들어진 공동체 모두의 문제가 된다.

• 복식
• /
• 제22권
• /
• pp.205-224
• /
• 1994

It was aimed to study the costume of Koryo dynasty based upon the thirty pictures of Bud-dha to hang on the wall among the existing Buddist paintings. The costume to study were made about 64 years during the King Chung-yol(1286) to the King Chung-jong(1350) which style was mostly related in Won Dynasty. 가) Men's wear ; 1. Hair style and hair dress ; Man tied up a top knot and they put on the hat such as a Kuan Kun and Mo. The young boys binds his hair up one, two, and three knot-s, and tied up with a hair ribbon, A kinds of Kuan-mo were Mine-lu-kuan Yuan-yu-kuan, Nong-kuan, Hae-chi-kuan Pok-du Yun-wha-kuan Yip-mo- and Tu-ku(Helmeto) 2. clothes ; 1) Colour of Koryo King's Mien-ku Kuan costume was not agree with blue and reddish black colour which was used in Yo, Song, Kum and Won Dynasty, however black and greenhish blue colour was agreed with. 2) The king wore T'ung-t'ien-kuan(Yuan-yu-kuan) and the government officials wore Chin-hien-kuan Hae-chi-kuan and Nong-kuan as a court dress. In general the king and the Crown Prince wore a hats which was used in T'ung-t'ien system however sometimes they wore small hats which was cited in literature. 3) Gate guard and upper garment wore colourful costume figured gold colour pattern which was distin-gtive costume system of Koryo. 4) A monk wore big sleeve long skirt big sleeve long jacket long skirt and shoulder scar-f full shoulder scarf or right hand shoulder opened scarf. 5) The Soldiers wore helmet shoulder or scarf pee-back hung-kap, pok-kap, yang-dan-g-kap we-yu-kap kun-kap, and boots and they carried arms. 6) The young boys wore scarf, loin cloth, long skirt, belt neckless, wan-silk, boots and foots wear and wristless. 나) Women's wear ; 1. Hair style and hairs and tied up with a hair ribbon and wore precious ston decorated hair dress wheel shape hair dress pan shaped head dress handkerchif covered hair dress decorated precious stone hair pin silk chippon made of head dress muf-fler shaped hairdress. Boots mocasin hae lee, suk and sandle wored as a shoes depends on the classes. They wore neckless, earing wres-tless and wan-pu-sik. 2. Closthe 1) High rank lade's wore un-kyun attached jacket and jacket sleeves decorated pleats and pleats decorated long skirt apron back apron knot belt, scarf this type is the same with Dang Dynasty five dynasty of china Song, Kum Won, Myung Dynasty and our cos-tume of Poe-hae, and Shilla Dynasty.

• 미술이론과 현장
• /
• 제8호
• /
• pp.89-119
• /
• 2009

Kim, Jun-Geun(Gisan) was a late 19th century Chosen dynasty painter who created numerous genre paintings for West European clients in the newly opened treaty ports of Wonsan, Busan and Inchon. The treaty ports in the late 19th century Chosen represented of the crossroads the economy, values, and the institutions of the West European powers. In particular, the agriculture-based economy, Confucianism, and land-owner noble class started being eroded by a commerce-based economy, the values of Christianity, West European institution, and a new class of people who amassed wealth from commerce. As Kim, Jun-Geun's paintings were created for sale to West European clients, they exhibit characteristics that are distinct from the traditional genre paintings in terms of presentation style and the selection of the subject matters. The export genre painting originated in the 18th century around Guangdong, China. Broadly, there are two styles of genre paintings: the Guangzhou style and Ningbo style. Kim, Jun-Geun's paintings resemble the Ningbo style. The Ningbo style tends to highlight the main subjects, form an album of small paintings, and provide a simple treatment of the scenes without the background. Kim, Jun-Geun's paintings cover most aspects of life of common people of his time, ranging well beyond the subjects matters of the traditional genre paintings. His subject matters include the scenes of funeral, folk games, Buddhist and ancestor worship, prison and punishment, shaman custom, debauchees, government officials' formal trips, beggars and handicapped, etc. Many of the subjects are the neglected and the oppressed of the society. And he presents in detail the dress and its ornament that the subjects wear, and all the utensils and things around them. Besides, his subjects' faces are generally expressionless, and their postures are stiff; as such, the feeling of liveliness or movement is lacking. It may be the results of Kim, Jun-Geun's taking the other perspective, namely of his West European clients, rather than his own. The adoption of the other perspective may in turn be a product of the Social Darwinism and the new sense of values that accompanied the infusion of Christianity and West European institutions. Kim, Jun-Geun's portrayals of his subjects appear to reflect the attributes with which the West European Orientalists' of the period characterized the people of the Far East, namely, backwardness, barbarity, irrationality, violence, and mysticism.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제22권3호
• /
• pp.189-207
• /
• 2006

동북아 물류허브의 건설이 국가전략으로 들어서면서 물류분야에 대한 관심이 제고되자, 환황해권을 배경으로 한 해공복합운송에 대한 관심도 고조되고 있다. 해공복합운송은 항공운송의 신속성과 해상운송의 저렴성을 결합한 틈새시장으로서의 성격을 갖는 것이다. 따라서 현재 진행되고 있는 해공복합운송의 향후 가능성을 확인하는 것은 중요한 연구과제 중 하나이다. 본 연구는 이러한 문제의식 하에서 환황해권 해상복합운송의 향후 발전 가능성을 경쟁력 측면, 장래수요 측면, 그리고 기술조건 및 수송환경의 변화 측면에서 검토하였다. 그 결과, 경쟁력 측면에서는 시간이나 비용 등 모두에서 현재 상태에서는 충분한 경쟁력이 있고, 장래수요 측면에서도 지속성의 여지는 있으나, 기술조건의 변화나 수송환경의 변화측면에서 안정성은 높지 않은 것을 확인하였다. 특히 항공기술의 발전에 따른 중소도시직항형태의 항공환경 변화, 중국 항공사를 겨냥한 국제 항공사들의 전략적 제휴 등은 해공복합운송의 향후 발전에 중요한 위협요인이 될 것으로 분석하였다. 이에 본 연구는 향후 해공복합운송의 발전을 위해 현재 진행되고 있는 환적화물 중심의 해공복합운송이 부가가치창출형 해공복합운송으로 발전되어 수요의 안정성을 높이고, 또 더 나아가 동북아 SCM 허브형 해공복합운송을 지향함으로써 수요창조형으로의 비전을 가져야 함을 향후 대안으로 제시하였다.

• 시큐리티연구
• /
• 제39호
• /
• pp.319-353
• /
• 2014

2001년 9/11 테러공격 이후에 미국은 사이버 안보를 가장 위중한 국가안보 문제로 인식한다. 미국 국방부는 2013년 처음으로 사이버 전쟁이 물리적인 테러보다 더 큰 국가안보 위협임을 확인했다. 단적으로 윌리암 린(William J. Lynn) 국방부 차관의 지적처럼 오늘날 사이버 공간은 육지, 바다, 하늘, 우주 다음의 '제5의 전장(the fifth domain of warfare)'이라고 함에 의문이 없다. 인터넷의 활용과 급속한 보급은 사이버 공간에서의 상상하지 못했던 역기능을 창출한 것이다. 이에 사이버 정보와 사이버 네트워크 보호까지를 포괄하지 않으면 국가안보 수호의 목표를 달성할 수 없게 되었다. 그런데 이러한 위험성에도 불구하고 각국은 운영상의 효율성과 편리성, 국제교류 등 외부세계와의 교류확대를 위해 국가기간망의 네트워크화를 더욱 확대해 가고 있고 인터넷에의 의존도는 심화되고 있다. 하지만 그 실천적인 위험성에도 불구하고 우리의 법제도적 장치와 사이버 안전에 대한 인식수준은 현실을 제대로 반영하지 못하고 있는 것으로 판단된다. 오늘날 가장 실천적이고 현실적인 위협을 제기하는 사이버 안보의 핵심은 하나도 둘도 계획의 구체성과 실천력의 배양이다. 대책회의나 교육 등은 부차적이다. 실전적인 사이버 사령부와 사이버 정보기구 그리고 사이버 전사의 창설과 육성에 더 커다란 노력을 경주해야 하고, 우리의 경우에는 가장 많은 경험을 가지고 인력과 장비를 가진 국가정보원의 사이버 수호 역량을 고양하고 더 많은 책무를 부담시키고 합리적인 업무 감독을 다하는 것에 있다고 할 것이다. 이에 본고는 법규범적으로 치안질서와 별개 개념으로서의 국가안보에 대한 무한책임기구인 국가정보기구의 사이버 안보에 대한 책무와 그에 더하여 필요한 사이버 정보활동과 유관활동의 범위를 검토하고자 한다. 사이버 테러와 사이버 공격을 포괄한 사이버 공격(Cyber Attack)에 대한 이해와 전자기장을 물리적으로 장악하는 전자전에 대한 연구도 포함한다.

• 복식
• /
• 제16권
• /
• pp.221-229
• /
• 1991

This thesis aims at reviewing the wearing aspect and formation of Chosun ceremonial dresses for meal and finding out the thought reflected by them from the standpoint that dresses themselves should be taken as one of the phenomena in culture. That is men's ceremonial costumes and confucian costumes of the royal family and the gentry family in Chosun is reviewed focused on the formation and the wearing aspect of Po, Which is a kind of them. And in the context of the phase of the times. I also considered the thoughts reflected on the clothes such as confucianism, Ying & Yang Theory, and the symbol and the thoughts of patterns in relation to the clothes. Confucian influence was the main force for the Chosun prohibitions for clothes. The major reasons for the prohibitions for clothes were as follows. First, they reflected confucian Chung myoung chooui(the principle that everything should be where it belongs). That is the prohibitions for clothes were used in the means to maintain feudalistic social order. influenced by social rank system. Second, they reflected confucian ethics in the means to recover social disciplines with the maintenance of traditional customs. This shows well in the restriction of luxurious items in dressing included the prohibitions for clothes. Third, they reflected Chosun's toadysm toward China. With the influx of Chinese style of dressing then government even changed the style of uniforms for public officials into that of Chinese resulting in dual styles of dressing. Ying & Yan Theory greatly affected the colors of Korean clothes and reflected toadysm toward China. too. The theory was embodied by prohibition of such colors for clothes as white, gray, and jade green. I reviewed the twelve patterns on Myunpok, Ten-Longivity patterns and Four-Gracious plants patterns in order to analyze the symbolism and thoughts of patterns for clothes. Nansam, Dopo, and Shimui worn by confucian scholars ensures that those clothes bears confucianism and philosopical factors. As shimui was worn by many people it appears in Chosun scholars' studies and a Chinese book called "Yeki". I reviewed the origin, procession, and ornaments of four ceremonial clothes and tried to find out the confucianism in them. First, In Kwanrei (the coming-of-age ceremony) remained ancestor worship and respect for manners. The clothes for this ceremony granted the rights and responsibilities of and adult to the wearer. The royal Kwanreipok had different dresses for each rank. As Samgapok, the crown prince wore Iksunkwan and Konryongpo for the first ritual, Wonryukwan and Kangsapo for the second, and Myunrukwan and Konpok for the third. The rank of the King's grandson was lower than the crown prince's. This example shows that Chosun people respected manners and thought the basic confucianism "God and people are equal." at the Royal court. Second, as Honreipok(wedding gown), the crown prince wore Myunrukwan and Konpok for Daereipok, Wonyukwan and Kangsapo for Napjing and Tongwoo, and Iksunkwan and Konryongpo for Chekbinui. But common people were allowed to wear an official outfit only for wedding in the means of congratulation on the most important day of their life. Wedding gowns which reflected Ying and Yang Theory emphasized the thought that union of a man and a wife is the most important event in life. Third, Sangrei(funeral) was the last ritual of a human being to send off the deceased. The mourning dresses expressed lamentation of the people left behind. Five-Dress-System for each the relative degree of familarity showed the solemnity and formality, which represented the formality of confucianism and ancestor worship. I reviewed the mourning dresses by dividing them into royal, Yangban's, and commons. They were featured by the fact that there was only one style for every walk of life. It is construed that anyone in mourning can wear the same clothes since he feels the same way regardless of his social rank. Fourth, Chereipok(sacrificial rite dresses) had different styles for each social rank. The King wore Myunpok(Kuryumyun and Kujangpok) were recorded to be worn first in the fourth year of King Taecho's ruling. The crown prince wore Palryumyun and Chiljangpok for sacrificial rite dress which was finally settled when King Sejong was in power. Common people wore Dopo, Shimui for the rite dress in the beginning of the Chosun Era and wore Dopo after Japanese invasion of Korea in 1592. In conclusion, confucianism played the main role in ceremonial dress system of Chosun and that was because it emphasized the ethics of action in life, which was different from other religions. It is true that cause-oriented thoughts and Chung myoung chooui in confucianism drove all ceremonies to extreme manners, discriminating the people who belonged to the lower social rank, and resulting in extremly luxurious life style. However, they also created a unique trend and clothes culture in the Chosun Era. I wish that this thesis provieds important information and direction for furthur studies in the future.

• 디자인학연구
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.43-62
• /
• 1989

The luxury is the expression of human being's ornament instinct. In this study, in order to grasp the moulding system of the Korean's personal ornaments, the process of luxury prohibition was reviewed to search for to which direction the ornaments developed in the frame of the prohibited style connected closely to the character of the personal ornaments. The proiod was fixed from the old society to the late Chosun dynasty era. The beginning of the luxury in Korea seems to be the start of the luxury burial at the time of funeral in the age of Koguryo., In the era of Koguryo, 10th year of King Dongmyung (B. C. 28), in the era of Baekje, 27th year of King Koi(260), the prohibition of dress regulation and the style of dress were conducted. The prohibition of personal ornaments in Silla was started from King Bup:Heung, and in the 9th year of King Heung-Duk, the prohibition was conducted in order to correct the luxury of the nobles and set up the social discipline. In the 11 th of King Il-Sung-Ni-Sa-Kum, the use of gold, silver and jade was prohibited in the civilian circles. The prohibition of Silla was succeeded to Koryo era, and in the 7th year of King Kwangjong(956), the system of Baekgwan Gongbok(uniform for government officials) was set up, and the system of Sasek Gongbok(four color official uniform) was set up in the 11 th year of the same King, and the prohibition of the personal ornaments such as crown and band is considred to have been conducted. The prohibition of gold and silver was conducted in the first year of King Sungjong(982), and in the 4th year of King Chungryul(l260), the order of wearing the dress and hat in accordance with the Yusan dynasty and the Mongolian customs were widely circulated in the royal court and vivilian circles. The strong influence of Mongolia made the taste of the traditional personal ornaments laste. The personal ornaments were used for the nobles until the age of the Unified Sillar but even the common people could use them in case they were rich, and such a circumstances made the use of foreign goods inflated. The prohibition of Koryo era was aimed at the prohibition of the foreign goods of luxury, and the classification of the social status.In the age of Chosun Dynasty, the production of gold and silver was feeble indeed but the oute reason of the prohibition was to eradicate the luxurious tendency, elevate the custom of eradicate the luxurious tendency, elevate the custom of thrift, and moreover, the gold, silver and jade were no the products of Korea and the prohibition was conducted but the true reason was afor the tribute tt China and the classification of status. The prohibition of Chosun dynasty was conducted first in the June of the 3rd year of King Taejo The major contents of prohibition was no use of gold, silver and jade, coral, agate, amber, etc. of th, wives of the Dang-Sang-Kwan (Court Nobleman) or their sons and daughters, and the same pheno menon was common even at the time of marriage. The people engaged in the secret trade there of wert beheaded. The personal ornaments in the prohibition were the pendent trinket, Binyo (crossbar) ceremonial ornamental hat, ring, earring, ornamental knife, hat string, hat ornament, belt, etc. Thl luxurious marriage expenses out of the luxury was severe, and lose of the marriageable age because 0 non-preparing the marriage goods was the national evil. The prohibition oC luxury was hard to bt kept to the nobles or rich people, the same as old days and present days. The prohibition of th{ luxury and personal ornaments of Korea had nothing to do with the commons, and it was limited tc the nobles and rich people. The prohibition was aimed to cultivating the custom of frugality by eradicating the luxurious atmosphere, but it was chiefly due to the tribute to the China and tht discrimination of the. status. We can say that the recent personal ornament was the flower of handi craft industry bloomed in the prohibition and regulation.

• 미술이론과 현장
• /
• 제4호
• /
• pp.123-144
• /
• 2006

Foreigners who arrived in Korea after the age of enlightenment were Japanese, Chinese and 'Westerners' who were Europeans and Americans. The westerners were diplomats who visited Korea for colonization or for increasing their economical profits by trading after the spread of imperialism, and tourists curious of back countries, artists, explores and missionaries to perform their roles for their religious beliefs. They contacted with Korean cultural and educational people as missionaries and instructors during Japanese colonial period. In 1945, the allied forces occupied Korea under the name of takeover of Japanese colony after Japan's surrender and the relation between foreigners and Korean cultured men enter upon a new phase. For 3 years, American soldiers enforced lots of systems in Korea and many pro-American people were educated. This relationship lasted even after the establishment of the government of Korean Republic and especially, diplomats called as pro-Korean group came again after Korean War. Among them, there were lots of foreigners interested in cultures and arts. In particular, government officials under American Forces who were influential on political circles or diplomats widened their insights toward Korean cultural assets and collected them a lot. Those who were in Korea from the period of independence to 1950s wrote their impressions about Korean cultural assets on newspapers or journals after visiting contemporary Korean exhibitions. Among them, A. J. McTaggart, Richard Hertz and the Hendersons were dominant. They thought the artists had great interests in compromising and uniting the Orient and the West based on their knowledge of Korean cultural assets and they advised. However, it was different from Korean artist's point of view that the foreigners thought Korean art adhered oriental features and contained western contents. From foreigners' point of view, it is hard to understand the attitude Korean artists chose to keep their self-respect through experiencing the Korean war. It is difficult to distinguish their thought about Korean art based on their exotic taste from the Korean artists' local and peninsular features under Japanese imperialism. We can see their thought about Korean art and their viewpoint toward the third world, after staying in Korea for a short period and being a member of the first world. The basic thing was that they could see the potentialities through the worldwide, beautiful Korean cultural assets and they thought it was important to start with traditions. It is an evidence showing Korean artists' pride in regard to the art culture through experiencing the infringement of their country. By writing about illuminating Korean art from the third party's view, foreigners represented their thoughts through it that their economical, military superiority goes with their cultural superiority. The Korean artist's thought of emphasizing Korean history and traditions, reexamining and using it as an original creation may have been inspired by westerners' writings. 'The establishment of national art' that Korean artists gave emphasis then, didn't only affect one of the reactions toward external impact, 'the adhesion of tradition'. In the process of introducing Korean contemporary art and national treasure in America, different view caused by role differences-foreigner as selector and Korean as assistant-showed the fact evidently that the standard of beauty differed between them. By emphasizing that the basis to classify Korean cultural assets is different from the neighborhood China and Japan, they tried to reflect their understanding that the feature of Korean art is on speciality other than universality. And this make us understand that even when Korean artists profess modernism, they stress that the roots are on Korean and oriental tradition. It was obviously a different thought from foreigners' view on Korean art that Korean artists' conception of modernism and traditional roots are inherent in Korean history. In 1950s, after the independence, Korea had different ideas from foreigners that abstract was to be learned from the west. Korea was enduring tough times with their artists' self-respect which made them think that they can learn the method, but the spirit of abstract is in the orient.