• Title/Summary/Keyword: Charge ordering

Search Result 35, Processing Time 0.02 seconds

공공기관 IT 서비스 종합관리 프레임워크 도입의 적정성 연구 (A Study on the Suitability of Unified Project Management Framework Applying for IT Services in Public Organizations)

  • 박민국;박대하
    • 서비스연구
    • /
    • 제7권3호
    • /
    • pp.21-36
    • /
    • 2017
  • 최근 정보화 사업이 대형화, 지능화, 융합화되고 있지만 이를 관리 및 감독하는 정보시스템 감리 제도와 사업관리(PMO) 제도는 업무 범위가 중복되거나 경계가 명확하지 않은 부분이 많아 발주기관의 용역 선정에 어려움이 발생하고 있다. 독립성, 품질성, 경제성, 책임성이 개선된 사업관리 및 감리 프레임워크가 요구되며, 이에 따라 정보시스템 감리협회에서는 대략적인 프로세스가 구조화된 정보화 사업 종합관리 프레임워크를 제안하여 사업관리 및 감리 제도를 발전적으로 개편하려는 움직임을 보인다. 본 논문에서는 사업 초기의 발주활동에서부터 사후단계인 운영활동까지 전 단계에 걸친 정보화 사업 종합관리 프레임워크를 소개하고 기존의 관리제도와의 비교분석을 통해 업무 범위를 확인한다. 또한 기존제도와 유사제도를 분석해 감리제도와 PMO 제도 통합의 당위성을 살펴본다. 최종적으로 BSC 성과관리 지표를 기반으로 구현된 COBIT5의 IT 목표 틀을 평가도구로 활용해 종합관리 프레임워크의 적정성을 분석한다. 분석 결과는 정보화 사업의 담당자들이 종합관리 프레임워크의 실무적인 적용에 앞서 그 특성을 이해하는 데 도움이 될 것으로 기대한다.

치과의료기관 종사자의 치과의료기관 평가제도에 대한 수용에 관한 연구 - 감염관리 부문을 중심으로 - (A Study on Dental Hospital Staff's Acceptance toward the Dental Institutions Accreditation System - A Study of Infection Management Part -)

  • 송영채;김상만;엄기현;장성일
    • 한국병원경영학회지
    • /
    • 제15권3호
    • /
    • pp.123-142
    • /
    • 2010
  • The Government is going to enforce assessment of dental institutions in addition to assessment of medical institutions so that it can provide good-quality medical service to people having much interest in quality of medical service. But the empirical research on the assessment of dental institutions which is still in a model assessment stage, is insufficient. Accordingly, the present research aims to help dental institutions preparing the main assessment by researching an acceptance level of workers of dental institutions in a process performing assessment of dental institutions, based on the preceding researches that the perceived utility has influence on implementation intention. The present research proved the influence that job relevance, result demonstration, usability and education & training of workers and manager's leadership of an infection management part affects perceived utility and implementation intention. As a research result, all the job relevance, result demonstration, usability have a positive(+) influence on perceived utility and implementation intention, and the influence of job relevance most affects especially. The leadership and education & training have influence on what workers get to have implementation intention after perception of utility of infection management according to the order. According to the above results, it can be understood that medical institutions preparing for assessment of dental institutions take charge of the assessment part having high relevance with work of workers and need to make a manager ordering performance of its assessment be able to foster a leadership for improving effectiveness of assessment performance.

  • PDF

공공공사의 발주방식선정을 위한 의사결정요인 연구 (Determining Decision-making Factors for the Selection of Contract Methods in Public Construction)

  • 김대길;이웅균;이학주
    • 한국건축시공학회지
    • /
    • 제15권4호
    • /
    • pp.405-412
    • /
    • 2015
  • 공공공사의 발주는 발주방식의 선정이 발주부서 또는 발주업무 담당자의 업무적 경험 위주로 선정되고 있어, 해당 공사의 유형이나 특성 분석이 고려된 객관적인 선정 프로세스를 거치지 못하고 있다. 따라서 본 연구는 프로젝트 발주방식 선정 모델의 개발을 위한 초기 연구로써 공공공사의 발주방식 선정에 영향을 끼치는 주요 요인들을 분석하여 제시하고자 한다. 기존의 발주방식 관련 문헌조사를 통해 1차 요인을 제시하고, 요인분석을 통해 최종 영향 요인을 제시한다. 그 결과 발주자의 특성, 건설시장 환경, 조직, 프로젝트 특성, 비용, 책임요소의 6가지 대분류로 나뉘었으며, 하위요인으로 14가지가 선정되었다. 본 연구에서 제시된 요인들은 향후 공공공사 발주방식 선정을 위한 의사결정 지원 모델개발의 기초자료로 활용될 것이다.

6시그마 도구를 활용한 대학도서관 멀티미디어 서비스 개선 변수 도출에 관한 연구 (A Study on Identifying Factors Affecting Improvement for Academic Libraries Multimedia Services Using Six Sigma Methodology)

  • 노동조;남민석
    • 정보관리학회지
    • /
    • 제30권1호
    • /
    • pp.111-129
    • /
    • 2013
  • 본 연구는 6시그마 DMAIC 방법론의 정의(Define)와 측정(Measure) 단계의 기법들을 활용하여 대학도서관 멀티미디어 서비스 개선에 영향을 미치는 주요 변수들을 도출하였다. 이를 위하여 S대학교 중앙학술정보관의 사례를 중심으로 현장 사서들의 브레인스토밍, X-Y Matrix와 특성요인도 작성, 도서관 홈페이지를 통한 이용자 의견 분석, 이용자 인터뷰 등을 통하여 대학도서관 멀티미디어 서비스의 프로세스를 분석하고, 핵심 품질특성을 지표화하였다. 그리고 Process Map과 특성요인도를 통하여 멀티미디어 서비스에 영향을 미치는 잠재원인변수들을 도출하고, 도출한 잠재원인변수를 X-Y Matrix와 Pareto Chart에 의하여 우선순위화하여 멀티미디어 서비스에 영향을 미치는 주요 요인으로 '자료 선정 전담자 유무', '자료 선정주기', '독립된 멀티미디어실 운영 유무', '자료 배가 방법', '인기자료 안내 여부', '입수자료 통보 여부', '신간 자료 안내 방법', '구입주문처리 방법', '주문자료 진행사항 점검 주기', '자료 신청자 유형', '자료 신청 방법', '반납 시 자료 상태 점검 여부', '소장자료 목록 안내 방법', '연체자료 회수방법'의 14개 변수를 도출하였다.

Publication Report of the Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences over its History of 15 Years - A Review

  • Han, In K.
    • Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences
    • /
    • 제15권1호
    • /
    • pp.124-136
    • /
    • 2002
  • As an official journal of the Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP), the Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences (AJAS) was born in February 1987 and the first issue (Volume 1, Number 1) was published in March 1988 under the Editorship of Professor In K. Han (Korea). By the end of 2001, a total of 84 issues in 14 volumes and 1,761 papers in 11,462 pages had been published. In addition to these 14 volumes, a special issue entitled "Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition" (April, 2000) and 3 supplements entitled "Proceedings of the 9th AAAP Animal Science Congress" (July, 2000) were also published. Publication frequency has steadily increased from 4 issues in 1988, to 6 issues in 1997 and to 12 issues in 2000. The total number of pages per volume and the number of original or review papers published also increased. Some significant milestones in the history of the AJAS include that (1) it became a Science Citation Index (SCI) journal in 1997, (2) the impact factor of the journal improved from 0.257 in 1999 to 0.446 in 2000, (3) it became a monthly journal (12 issues per volume) in 2000, (4) it adopted an English editing system in 1999, and (5) it has been covered in "Current Contents/Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Science since 2000. The AJAS is subscribed by 842 individuals or institutions. Annual subscription fees of US$ 50 (Category B) or US$ 70 (Category A) for individuals and US$ 70 (Category B) or US$ 120 (Category A) for institutions are much less than the actual production costs of US$ 130. A list of the 1,761 papers published in AJAS, listed according to subject area, may be found in the AJAS homepage (http://www.ajas.snu.ac.kr) and a very well prepared "Editorial Policy with Guide for Authors" is available in the Appendix of this paper. With regard to the submission status of manuscripts from AAAP member countries, India (235), Korea (235) and Japan (198) have submitted the most manuscripts. On the other hand, Mongolia, Nepal, and Papua New Guinea have never submitted any articles. The average time required from submission of a manuscript to printing in the AJAS has been reduced from 11 months in 1997-2000 to 7.8 months in 2001. The average rejection rate of manuscripts was 35.3%, a percentage slightly higher than most leading animal science journals. The total number of scientific papers published in the AJAS by AAAP member countries during a 14-year period (1988-2001) was 1,333 papers (75.7%) and that by non- AAAP member countries was 428 papers (24.3%). Japanese animal scientists have published the largest number of papers (397), followed by Korea (275), India (160), Bangladesh (111), Pakistan (85), Australia (71), Malaysia (59), China (53), Thailand (53), and Indonesia (34). It is regrettable that the Philippines (15), Vietnam (10), New Zealand (8), Nepal (2), Mongolia (0) and Papua New Guinea (0) have not actively participated in publishing papers in the AJAS. It is also interesting to note that the top 5 countries (Bangladesh, India, Japan, Korea and Pakistan) have published 1,028 papers in total indicating 77% of the total papers being published by AAAP animal scientists from Vol. 1 to 14 of the AJAS. The largest number of papers were published in the ruminant nutrition section (591 papers-44.3%), followed by the non-ruminant nutrition section (251 papers-18.8%), the animal reproduction section (153 papers-11.5%) and the animal breeding section (115 papers-8.6%). The largest portion of AJAS manuscripts was reviewed by Korean editors (44.3%), followed by Japanese editors (18.1%), Australian editors (6.0%) and Chinese editors (5.6%). Editors from the rest of the AAAP member countries have reviewed slightly less than 5% of the total AJAS manuscripts. It was regrettably noticed that editorial members representing Nepal (66.7%), Mongolia (50.0%), India (35.7%), Pakistan (25.0%), Papua New Guinea (25.0%), Malaysia (22.8%) and New Zealand (21.5%) have failed to return many of the manuscripts requested to be reviewed by the Editor-in-Chief. Financial records show that Korea has contributed the largest portion of production costs (68.5%), followed by Japan (17.3%), China (8.3%), and Australia (3.5%). It was found that 6 AAAP member countries have contributed less than 1% of the total production costs (Bangladesh, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Papua New Guinea and Thailand), and another 6 AAAP member countries (Mongolia, Nepal and Pakistan, Philippine and Vietnam) have never provided any financial contribution in the form of subscriptions, page charges or reprints. It should be pointed out that most AAAP member countries have published more papers than their financial input with the exception of Korea and China. For example, Japan has published 29.8% of the total papers published in AJAS by AAAP member countries. However, Japan has contributed only 17.3% of total income. Similar trends could also be found in the case of Australia, Bangladesh, India, Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand. A total of 12 Asian young animal scientists (under 40 years of age) have been awarded the AJAS-Purina Outstanding Research Award which was initiated in 1990 with a donation of US$ 2,000-3,000 by Mr. K. Y. Kim, President of Agribrands Purina Korea Inc. In order to improve the impact factor (citation frequency) and the financial structure of the AJAS, (1) submission of more manuscripts of good quality should be encouraged, (2) subscription rate of all AAAP member countries, especially Category B member countries should be dramatically increased, (3) a page charge policy and reprint ordering system should be applied to all AAAP member countries, and (4) all AAAP countries, especially Category A member countries should share more of the financial burden (advertisement revenue or support from public or private sector).