• 대한정형도수물리치료학회지
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.69-79
• /
• 2009

Purpose : to investigate the effectiveness of joint mobilization and myofascial release on the neck pain and to provide the effective treatment. Methods : Twenty-two subjects with neck pain participated in the experiment. All subjects were randomly assigned to a joint mobilization group(n=11) or a myofascial release group(n=11). Both groups received treatment for 15 minutes four times during 2 weeks. Cervical range of motion(CROM) instrument was used to measure range of neck motion, and Algometer was used to measure tenderness. All measurements of the subjects were measured at pre-treatment and post-treatment. Results : 1. The range of neck right side-bending motion of the myofascial release group was significantly increased(P<0.05), and the range of neck extension, right side-bending, left side-bending, right rotation motion of the joint mobilization group was significantly increased(P<0.05). 2. There was no significant improvement of tenderness in both groups(p>0.05). Conclusion : These data suggest that joint mobilization is more effective against increasing the range of motion than myofascial release, but myofascial release is more beneficial to tenderness than joint mobilization although it does not have a significant difference in the tenderness because there was a little improvement.

• 대한지역사회작업치료학회지
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.17-24
• /
• 2017

목적 : 건강한 성인을 대상으로 목의 관절가동범위를 측정하는데 임상에서 간편하게 적용할 수 있는 스마트폰 어플리케이션의 유용성을 확인하고자 한다. 연구방법 : 목의 관절가동범위는 스마트폰 어플리케이션과 각도계로 목의 굽힘, 폄, 오른쪽 돌림, 왼쪽 돌림, 오른쪽 가쪽 굽힘, 왼쪽 가쪽 굽힘의 움직임을 각각 측정하였다. 검사자내 신뢰도와 검사자간 신뢰도를 측정하기 위해 같은 검사자가 두 번, 다른 검사자가 한 번으로 총 세 번 측정을 실시하였다. 검사 순서는 무작위로 하였으며, 두 검사자는 서로 측정한 결과를 알지 못하게 하였다. 결과 : 연구에 참여한 대상자는 남자 9명, 여자 21명이었다. 실험 결과 스마트폰 어플리케이션과 각도계의 평균 각도 비교에서 오른쪽 가쪽 굽힘을 제외한 모든 항목에서 유의한 차이가 없는 것으로 나타났다(p>.05). 스마트폰 어플리케이션과 각도계의 검사자내 신뢰도는 전 움직임에서 ICC값이 .841~.958로, 검사자간 신뢰도는 전 움직임에서 ICC값이 .720~.944로 나타나 모두 높은 수준의 신뢰도를 보였다. 결론 : 스마트폰 어플리케이션과 각도계는 목의 관절가동범위를 측정하는데 신뢰할 수 있는 것으로 나타나, 스마트폰 어플리케이션은 관절가동범위에 신속하고 정확한 측정으로 인해 임상에서 유용한 도구로 활용할 수 있을 것이다.

• 한국전문물리치료학회지
• /
• 제22권3호
• /
• pp.50-60
• /
• 2015

The purpose of this study was to apply the joint mobilization technique to the level of segments with pain and to the level of segments with hypomobility respectively and compare the immediate effects of the joint mobilization technique on the pain, the active cervical range of motion (ROM), and treatment satisfaction of patients with acute mechanical neck pain. After the baseline assessment, forty-two patients were randomized into two groups: a painful group ($n_1=21$) that received joint mobilization at the most painful cervical spine level and a hypomobile group ($n_2=21$) that received joint mobilization at the most hypomobile cervical level. The patients received an intervention that applied unilateral posterior-anterior gliding for 5 minutes and two repetitions of 10 times of active extension motion with distraction. In the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, the painful group and the hypomobile group were improved significantly in all pain variables (p<.001), while the painful group was improved significantly in the active cervical flexion (p<.001), extension (p<.001), left side-bending (p<.01), right side-bending (p=.001), left rotation (p<.001), and right rotation (p<.001). The hypomobile group was significantly improved in active cervical flexion (p=.001), extension (p<.001), left side-bending (p<.05), right side-bending (p=.001), left rotation (p=.001), and right rotation (p<.01) after intervention. In the Mann-Whitney U test, there was no significant difference in any of the dependent variables after the intervention between the two groups, but the painful group was slightly superior to the hypomobile group in all variables except for the right lateral flexion ROM and treatment satisfaction. These outcomes suggest that the cervical joint mobilization may be applied to either the level of painful segments or the hypomobile segments for the treatment of patients with acute mechanical neck pain.

• PNF and Movement
• /
• 제19권3호
• /
• pp.413-422
• /
• 2021

Purpose: This study was conducted to investigate changes in the cervical and lumbar flexion-relaxation ratio, range of motion, pressure pain threshold, and perceived comfort following the wearing of a trunk brace during smartphone watching. Methods: To calculate the number of subjects for this study, an analysis with G^*Power was performed at a statistical power of 0.8, an effect size of 0.5, and a significance level of 0.05, based on the results of a preliminary experiment on five subjects. In total, 27 adult men and women were recruited who had been informed of the study's purpose and process and had agreed to participate. All subjects watched content on a smartphone for 20 minutes in the same posture and conditions while wearing and not wearing a trunk brace, and then their cervical and lumbar flexion-relaxation ratio, range of motion, pressure pain threshold, and perceived comfort were measured. Results: Compared to the non-wearing of a trunk brace, the wearing of a trunk brace resulted in a statistically significant smaller decline in cervical extension and right-side cervical rotation (p<0.05). When the subjects wore a trunk brace, their right- and left-side cervical and right-side lumbar pressure pain statistically significantly improved when compared to not wearing a trunk brace (p<0.05). They also perceived a significantly lowered level of comfort 20 minutes after wearing a trunk brace compared to immediately after wearing it (p<0.05). Conclusion: The trunk brace was effective in reducing declines in right-side cervical rotation and the occurrence of left- and right-side cervical and right-side lumbar pressure pain. The findings indicate the need to improve the perceived comfort of trunk braces.

• Physical Therapy Rehabilitation Science
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.40-48
• /
• 2012

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare sling exercise group to McKenzie exercise group in patients with chronic neck pain. Design: Two group pretest-posttest design. Methods: Twenty subjects who have chronic neck pain were randomly divided into sling exercise group (n=10) and McKenzie exercise (n=10). Sling exercise group (n=10) received sling exercise for 30 minutes per day, twice a week over a 4 week period. And the other group were exercised McKenzie exercise (n=8) for 30 minutes per day, twice a week over a 4 week period. Neck disability index (NDI), Visual analog scale (VAS), algometer, digital manual muscle tester (MMT) and cervical muscle strength and cervical range of motion (ROM) are closely measured to identify the effect of sling exercise and McKenzie exercise. Results: For NDI, VAS, algometer on both trapezius, both rotation of cervical muscle strength, both lateral flexion of cervical muscle strength, cervical extension of ROM and both lateral flexion of ROM were significantly increased after intervention in sling exercise group (p<0.05), For VAS, algometer on both trapezius, left (Lt.) rotation of cervical muscle strength, Lt. lateral flexion of cervical muscle strength, cervical flexion and extension of ROM and Lt. lateral flexion of ROM were significantly increased after than before intervention in McKenzie exercise group (p<0.05). Conclusions: These study outcomes clearly support the notion that sling and McKenzie exercise improved pain, Muscle strength and ROM of patients with chronic neck pain. These results suggest that sling and McKenzie exercise program is suitable for chronic neck pain.

• 산업융합연구
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.27-35
• /
• 2020

본 연구는 목뼈와 등뼈에 적용한 관절가동술이 전방머리자세를 가진 성인의 목통증, 목관절가동범위 및 균형에 미치는 영향을 알아보고자 실시되었다. 전방머리자세로 판명된 대학생 26명을 목뼈 관절가동술 그룹과 등뼈 관절가동술 그룹으로 13명 씩 무작위 배정하여 모든 대상자에게 각각 하루 10회, 1회당 30초 적용, 30초 휴식으로, 주 3회, 4주간 관절가동술을 적용한 후 변화를 비교하였다. 연구 결과, 통증과 관절가동범위에서 두 그룹 모두 유의한 효과가 있었고(p<.01), 그룹 간 비교에서는 유의한 차이가 없었다. 정적 균형의 그룹 내 변화에서 목뼈 관절가동술 그룹이 오른발 및 눈을 감았을 때 유의한 개선을 보였고(p<.05), 등뼈 관절가동술 그룹에서는 유의한 변화가 없었다(p<.05). 왼발 정적 균형은 두 그룹 모두 유의한 개선이 없었고(p<.05). 그룹 간 정적 균형의 비교에서도 유의한 차이가 없었다(p<.05). 동적 균형의 그룹 내 변화에서 목뼈 관절가동술 그룹이 앞쪽, 왼쪽, 오른쪽에서 유의한 개선을 보였고(p<.05), 등뼈 관절가동술 그룹이 앞쪽과 오른쪽에서 유의한 개선을 보였다(p<.05). 그룹 간 동적 균형에서는 왼쪽에서 유의한 차이가 나타났다(p<.05). 본 연구를 통하여 목뼈 및 등뼈 관절가동술은 전방머리자세 성인의 통증, 관절가동범위, 균형 능력에 대하여 유의한 효과가 있었다.

• Physical Therapy Rehabilitation Science
• /
• 제9권3호
• /
• pp.149-154
• /
• 2020

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the Kaltenborn-Evjenth concept of nerve mobilization combined with intermittent cervical segment traction (ICST) on pain, Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores, range of motion (ROM) and endurance in persons with cervical radiculopathy (CR). Design: Two-group pretest-posttest design. Methods: Thirty subjects participated in this study and were randomly assigned to two groups. The ICST group (n=15) was performed simultaneously with nerve mobilization and cervical traction for the segment with cervical pain at the same time. The intermittent cervical total traction (ICTT) group (n=15) performed nerve mobilization and cervical traction for the whole cervical area at the same time. In this study, outcome measures such as the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), NDI, ROM, endurance (cranio-cervical flexion test), and passive intervertebral motion performed before and 4 weeks after the experiment were compared to investigate the effects of each intervention. Results: In both groups, there were significant differences in the VAS, NDI scores, and endurance, and there were significant differences between the two groups except for endurance (p<0.05). In the ICST group, significant differences were found in all ROM, and in the ICTT group, significant differences were found in only extension, and there were significant differences between the two groups (p<0.05). Conclusions: The ICST group showed more improvement than the ICTT group in pain, NDI scores and ROM. Moreover, our findings show that the ICST could be used as a new strategy for manual therapy in persons with CR.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제11권11호
• /
• pp.4346-4353
• /
• 2010

본 연구의 목적은 20대의 정상 성인에서 경부의 관절가동범위와 마사지 및 정적 스트레칭이 관절가동범위에 미치는 영향을 측정하는 것이다. 근골격계와 신경계의 질환이 없는 100명(마사지그룹=50, 스트레칭그룹=50)을 대상으로 실시하였다. 마사지와 정적 스트레칭은 흉쇄유돌근, 사각근, 승모근, 반극근, 판상근, 후두하근, 다열근과 회선근에 적용되었다. 두 그룹은 주 3회의 중재를 받았다. 중재 시간은 10분이었다. 마사지그룹은 경찰법, 유날법 및 스트라이핑 마사지가 사용되었고, 스트레칭그룹은 정적 스트레칭이 사용되었다. 경부의 가동범위 측정도구는 경부의 8가지 동작(후두하 굽힘과 폄, 경부의 굽힘과 폄, 왼쪽 옆굽힘과 오른쪽 옆굽힘, 왼쪽 돌림과 오른쪽 돌림)을 분석하기 위하여 사용되었다. 통계학적 분석결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 정상적인 경부의 관절가동범위는 남자에서 후두하굽힘과 폄이 $2.39^{\circ}$와 38.36^{\circ}$, 경부의 굽힘과 폄이 $54.11^{\circ}$와 69.39^{\circ}$, 왼쪽과 오른쪽의 옆굽힘이 $43.50^{\circ}$와 $41.28^{\circ}$, 왼쪽과 오른쪽의 돌림이 $66.39^{\circ}$와 $65.94^{\circ}$로 나타났고, 여자에서는 후두하 굽힘과 폄이 $5.14^{\circ}$와 $36.47^{\circ}$, 경부의 굽힘과 폄이 $55.92^{\circ}$와 $71.22^{\circ}$, 왼쪽과 오른쪽의 옆굽힘이 $43.34^{\circ}$와 $41.06^{\circ}$, 왼쪽과 오른쪽의 돌림이 $69.38^{\circ}$와 $68.63^{\circ}$로 나타났다. 둘째, 후두하 굽힘, 왼쪽 돌림과 오른쪽 돌림에서 여성이 남성보다 더 높은 관절가동범위를 보였다(p<0.05). 셋째, 마사지군과 스트레칭군은 치료 후에 모든 항목에서 관절가동범위의 증가를 보였지만 두 그룹간의 비교에서는 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다(p<0.05). 위의 결과는 마사지와 정적 스트레칭이 경부 근육의 신장 및 이완을 통해 가동범위를 증가시키는 적당한 방법이라는 것을 제시한다. 그리고 경부의 가동범위를 조사하는 연구의 기초로 제공될 수 있을 것이다.

• 대한정형도수물리치료학회지
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.53-60
• /
• 2010

Purpose : Neck pain is commonly experienced by both adolescents and adults. The purpose of this study was to measure neck disability index(NDI) and the cervical range of motion(CROM) following spinal manipulation and mobilization techniques. Methods : Thirty participants(manipulation=15, mobilization=15) with mild neck disability volunteered for this study. It was used to measure NDI with NDI questionnaire and six motions(neck flexion and extension, left and right lateral flexion, left and right rotation) with the CROM instrument. Independent t-test and paired t-test were used to estimate NDI and CROM, and compared left with right motions. Results : A significant decrease in NDI were found after spinal manipulation and mobilization treatment(p<.05). A trend toward increase in all cervical motions(flexion, extension, left and right lateral flexion, left and right rotation), after interventions, were revealed(p<.05). The significant differences were not found on NDI and CROM between the group(p<.05). It was presented asymmetric motions in cervical lateral flexion(p<.05) before and after treatment. Conclusions : Our results suggest that manipulation and mobilization probably provide at least short-term benefits for patients with mild neck pain. It is needed to be studied the factors and preventive methods influencing the asymmetric cervical motion.

• 대한정형도수물리치료학회지
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.15-24
• /
• 2009

Objectives : The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness between myofascial release technique and ultrasound in subjects with myofascial pain syndrome. Method : Twenty subjects with myofascial pain syndrome were randomly assigned to a myofascial release technique group(n=10) or an ultrsound group(n=10). The Cervical Range of Motion(C-ROM) instrument was used to measure cervical range of motion. Electromyography(EMG) was used to measure muscle power sternocleidomastoid and upper trapezius. Result : The result of this study shows there were no significant differences in ROM increase and muscle power increase between the myofascial release technique group and the ultrasound group. In the group with Myofascial Release Technique, the average score was $61.40{\pm}11.12$ in SCM flexion of C-ROM and $127.87{\pm}4.24$ in Rt. upper trapezius extension of EMG. In the group with ultra sound, the average score was $68.60{\pm}10.02$ in SCM flexion of C-ROM and $131.50{\pm}5.45$ in Rt. upper trapezius extension of EMG. Conclusion : The results suggest that there was no significant difference between two therapeutic techniques.