• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.77-92
• /
• 1990

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cytotoxic effects of 6 cavity liners in vitro. Human fibroblasts were cultured in ${\alpha}$-MEM and each liner was manually mixed and filled in glass ring cylinder ($8{\times}8mm$ in diameter, in height). The cylinders filled with the liners were placed in the center of the dish (35mm in diameter) containing 3ml of ${\alpha}$-MEM. Millipore filters (pore size $0.22{\mu}m$) to simulate dentin barrier were also placed between the bottom of cylinder and the dish. Then the culture dishes were stored in 5% $CO_2$ containing incubator for 5 and 10 days at the temperature of $36.6^{\circ}C$. The results of the experiments were analyzed by counting the cells in the period of 5 and 10 days respectively, and were assessed by calculating the cell multiplication rate and the relative growth rate. The experiemntal groups and the control group were compared statistically. The results of the study were summarized as follows: 1. The cell number of Zinc oxide-eugenol was $(4.13{\pm}1.31){\times}10^4$ cells/ml at 5 days and $(4.32{\pm}1.61){\times}10^4$ cells/ml at 10 days. 2. The cell number of Cavitec was ($8.35{\pm}2.87{\times}10^4$ cells/ml and $(10.08{\pm}5.10){\times}10^4$ cells/ml at 5 and 10 days respectively. 3. The cell number of Dycal was $(13.56{\pm}3.89){\times}10^4$ cells/ml at 5 days and $(34.75{\pm}8.85){\times}10^4$ cells/ml at 10 days. 4. The cell number of life was $(11.46{\pm}3.32){\times}10^4$ cells/ml and $(21.92{\pm}6.18){\times}10^4$ cells/ml at 5 and 10 days. 5. The cell number of Base cement was $(13.73{\pm}3.73){\times}10^4$ cells/ml and $(36.68{\pm}5.20){\times}10^4$ cells/ml at 5 and 10 days. 6. The cell number of Dentin cement was $(13.58{\pm}3.90){\times}10$ cells/ml and $(66.95{\pm}24.09){\times}10$ cells/ml at 5 and 10 days. 7. The cell multiplication rate of zinc oxide-eugenol cements was significantly less than that of the calcium hydroxide and glass ionomer cement. (P < 0.05)

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.464-469
• /
• 1997

The radiopacity of glass ionomer cements is quite variable. The use of a poorly radiopaque material as a base under other restorative materials can mislead the dentist to a diagnosis of recurrent decay. This study investigates the radiopacity of these materials and proposes a minimal radiopacity under which a material should not be used as a base or liner. It is important to determine the radiopacity of glass ionomer dental materials so that the clinician can appreciate the type of restorative materials used when radiographically evaluation the possibility of recurrent dental caries. In this study, radiopacity of Vitrement and Chemfil was compared with that of Cavalite, Miracle mix and polycarboxylate cement. Tooth model of artificial cavity preparation for diagnosis of recurrent caries was omitted. Radiopacity of each material was measured using relatives between thickness and radiopacity of Aluminium step wedge. The results were as follows : 1. Radiopacity of Vitrement was some higher than enamel. 2. Chemfil, restorative glass ionomer, was less radiopaque than enamel. 3. In order of higher radiopacity than enamel, Miracle mix was highest and was followed by polycarboxylate cement, Cavalite and Vitremer. 4. Vitremer, the Glass Ionomer Cement, is useful to detection of recurrent caries, because it is slightly higher radiopaque than enamel. So, it is suitable for restorative material and luting cement.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.307-330
• /
• 1992

The aim of this study was to investigate the physical properties of visible light curing Glass Ionomer cement for restorative esthetic filling. The control group was the autopolymerizing GC Fuji II Glass Ionomer cement (2.2: 1 P/L ratio) and the experimental groups were made by following procedure. To induce the polymerization by visible light, the powder of GC Fuji II GI cement and the liquid of Vitrabond for base & liner were mixed in an amalgam capsule with 2.5:1, 3.0:1, 3.5:1 P/L ratio (% wt/wt). After fabrication of specimens, compressive strength, fracture toughness ($K_{IC}$) Scanning Electron Microscope and X-ray Diffraction, water-leachable content, marginal leakage and surface roughness were studied. The results were as follows: 1. Only experimental No. 1 group (visible light curing) showed less compressive strength than control group 1 hour after curing. Strength was increased with aging in all groups, so the compressive strength of light curing groups was no less than that of autopolymerizing group after 3 weeks. 2. Experimental No.3 group (visible light curing) was inferior to No.2 group (visible light curing) in fracture resistance but light curing groups were more resistant to fracture than autopolymerizing group and showed ductile fracture pattern as compared with the brittle fracture pattern of autopolymerizing group. 3. From scanning electron microscopic image, various sized unreacted powder particles, surrounded by silica gel, were embedded in polysalt matrix. Light curing groups showed little crack and more dense unreacted particles than autopolymerizing group. 4. From X-ray diffraction analysis, GC Fuji II Glass Ionomer cement powder and all groups showed glassy appearance but light curing groups seemed to be more intensive in crystaline than autopolymerizing group. S. The most significant dissolution was shown in early setting period in all group. Light curing groups were dissolved less than autopolymerizing group. 6. Marginal leakage was not different significantly in case of cavity margin composed of same tooth structure (ex. only enamel margin, only dentin margin) but much more leakage was shown in dentin/cementum margin than enamel margin. In only case of only enamel margin, light curing groups were superior to autopolymerizing group. 7. All groups showed relatively smooth surface, which irregularity was less than $1{\mu}m$. Light curing groups were smoother than autopolymerizing group.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제35권2호
• /
• pp.116-124
• /
• 2010

본 연구에서는 복합 레진을 이용한 2급/5급 와동의 직접수복에 있어서 치과의사의 성별에 따른 술식의 차이를 비교하였다. 2008년 대한치과의사협회에 등록된 치과의사 12,193명을 대상으로 이 메일을 통한 설문조사를 실시하였다. 이 메일 수신이 확인된 2,632명 중 840명이 응답하였으며 응답자의 남녀 비율은(남 78.9%, 여 21.1%) 전체 치과의사의 남녀 비율과 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다(p > 0.05). Chi-square test 와 multiple logistic regression analysis 를 이용하여 남녀간 술식의 차 이를 검증하였다. 2급 와동 수복에서 여자치과의사는 4회 이상의 적층 분할 수복을 하는 경향이 남자치과의사에 비해 1.87배 높았으며, 술식 당 30분 이상 소요하는 경향은 2.72배 높았다(p < 0.05). 5급 와동 수복에서 여자치과의사는 베이스를 사용하는 경향이 1.83배 높았으며, 술식 당 20분 이상 소요하는 경향은 1.63배 높았다(p < 0.05). 본 설문조사에 따르면 남녀 성별에 따라 복합 레진 수복 술식의 차이가 존재하는 것으로 나타났다.