• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제15권20호
• /
• pp.9015-9019
• /
• 2014

The study aimed to compare the 2 main types of insurance used by colorectal cancer (CRC) patients in a university hospital in Thailand: universal coverage (UC) and 'Civil Servant Medical Benefit Scheme' (CSMBS) in terms of hospital expenditure and survival outcomes. CRC cases in stages I-IV who were operated on and had completed their adjuvant therapy in Songklanagarind Hospital from 2004 through 2013 were retrospectively reviewed regarding their hospital expenditure, focusing on surgical and chemotherapy costs. Of 1,013 cases analyzed, 524 (51.7%) were in the UC group while 489 (48.3%) belonged to the CSMBS group. Cases with stage IV disease were significantly more frequent in the UC group. Average total treatment expenditure (TTE) was 143,780 Thai Baht (THB) (1 US$ =~ 30 THB). The TTE increased with tumor stage and the chemotherapy cost contributed the most to the TTE increment. TTE in the CSMBS group was significantly higher than in the UC group for stage II-III CRCs. The majority of cases in the UC group (65.5%) used deGramont or Mayo as their first line regimen, and the proportion of cases who started with a capecitabine-based regimen (XELOX or $Xeloda^{(R)}$) was significantly higher in the CSMBS group (61.0% compared to 24.5% in the UC group, p-value < 0.01). On survival analysis, overall survival (OS) and progress free survival in the CSMBS group were significantly better than in the UC group. The 5-year OS in the CSMBS and UC groups were 84.3% and 74.6%, respectively (p-value < 0.01). In conclusion, the study indicates that in Thailand, the type of insurance influences resource utilization, especially the choice of chemotherapy, in CRC cases. This disparity in treatment, in turn, results in a gap in treatment outcomes.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제17권7호
• /
• pp.3511-3514
• /
• 2016

Purpose: To evaluate the treatment outcomes of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) or combined chemotherapy together with radiotherapy (CMT-RT) without surgery. Materials and Methods: A total of 84 patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma (stage II or III) between January $1^{st}$, 2003 and December $31^{st}$, 2013 were enrolled, 48 treated with preoperative CCRT (Gr.I) and 36 with combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy (CMT-RT) without surgery (Gr.II). The chemotherapeutic agents used concurrent with radiotherapy were either 5-fluorouracil short infusion plus leucovorin and/or capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil infusion alone. All patients received pelvic irradiation. Results: There were 5 patients (10.4%) with a complete pathological response. The 3 year-overall survival rates were 83.2% in Gr.I and 24.8 % in Gr.II (p<0.01). The respective 5 year-overall survival rates were 70.3% and 0% (p<0.01). The 5 year-overall survival rates in Gr.I for patients who received surgery within 56 days after complete CCRT as compared to more than 56 days were 69.5% and 65.1% (p=0.91). Preoperative CCRT used for 12 of 30 patients in Gr.I (40%) with lower rectal cancer demonstrated that in preoperative CCRT a sphincter sparing procedure can be performed. Conclusions: The results of treatment with preoperative CCRT for locally advanced rectal cancer showed comparable rates of overall survival and sphincter sparing procedures as compared to previous studies.

• Journal of Digestive Cancer Research
• /
• 제3권2호
• /
• pp.105-107
• /
• 2015

췌장암은 예후가 매우 불량한 암으로 수술적 절제술을 시행하여도 대부분의 경우 재발을 한다고 알려져 있다. 재발을 하는 경우 대개 항암화학요법을 시행하게 되나, 그 반응 또한 좋지 않은 것으로 알려져 있다. 간에 국소적으로 재발을 했을 경우 종양절제술을 시행하는 것에 대해서는 몇몇 보고가 있는 정도이며, 생존율을 향상시킬 수 있는지에 대해서는 연구가 거의 없는 상태이다. 본 증례는 유문보존 췌십이지장 절제술 시행 후 간에 국소적으로 재발한 췌장암에 대하여 gemcitabine 및 capecitabine과 oxaliplatin 병합 항암화학요법을 시행하였으나 크기가 증가하였고, 이에 종양절제술을 시행하였으며, 이후 장기생존을 보였던 경우로 매우 드문 증례를 경험하였기에 보고하는 바이다.

• Journal of Gastric Cancer
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.152-164
• /
• 2020

Purpose: To compare long-term disease-free survival (DFS) between patients receiving tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil (S-1) or capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for gastric cancer (GC). Materials and Methods: This retrospective multicenter observational study enrolled 983 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy with consecutive AC with S-1 or CAPOX for stage II or III GC at 27 hospitals in Korea between February 2012 and December 2013. We conducted propensity score matching to reduce selection bias. Long-term oncologic outcomes, including DFS rate over 5 years (over-5yr DFS), were analyzed postoperatively. Results: The median and longest follow-up period were 59.0 and 87.6 months, respectively. DFS rate did not differ between patients who received S-1 and CAPOX for pathologic stage II (P=0.677) and stage III (P=0.899) GC. Moreover, hazard ratio (HR) for recurrence did not differ significantly between S-1 and CAPOX (reference) in stage II (HR, 1.846; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.693-4.919; P=0.220) and stage III (HR, 0.942; 95% CI, 0.664-1.337; P=0.738) GC. After adjustment for significance in multivariate analysis, pT (4 vs. 1) (HR, 11.667; 95% CI, 1.595-85.351; P=0.016), pN stage (0 vs. 3) (HR, 2.788; 95% CI, 1.502-5.174; P=0.001), and completion of planned chemotherapy (HR, 2.213; 95% CI, 1.618-3.028; P<0.001) were determined as independent prognostic factors for DFS. Conclusions: S-1 and CAPOX AC regimens did not show significant difference in over-5yr DFS after curative gastrectomy in patients with stage II or III GC. The pT, pN stage, and completion of planned chemotherapy were prognostic factors for GC recurrence.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제27권2호
• /
• pp.78-83
• /
• 2009

목 적: 직장암에서 수술 전 항암화학방사선치료는 수술 후 항암화학방사선치료에 비하여 치료 성적은 비슷하며 독성은 낮아 최근에 많이 시행되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 수술 전 항암화학방사선치료 시 병행한 항암화학요법 중 적정 요법과 적정 이하의 비적정 요법에 따른 치료 결과를 알아보고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법: 2003년 4월부터 2006년 4월까지 수술 전 항암화학방사선치료와 수술을 시행한 환자 중 수술 병리결과 확보가 가능하고 단일 제제 화학요법을 시행한 환자 43명을 대상으로 하였다. 방사선치료는 전 골반에 41.4~50.4 Gy (중앙값, 45 Gy), 종양에 추가조사 0~5.4 Gy (중앙값, 5.4 Gy), 총 41.4~50.4 Gy (중앙값, 50.4 Gy)를 시행하였다. 적정군은 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 500 mg/$m^2$/day를 방사선치료 첫 3일 동안과 5주 후 3일 동안에 반복 급속 정주 한 6명과 경구 capecitabine을 방사선 치료일에 사용한 6명으로 총 12명이었다. 비적정군은 동일량의 5-FU를 방사선치료 첫 3일에만 급속 정주한 31명이었다. 수술은 방사선치료가 끝난 뒤 40~71일(중앙값, 58일)에 시행하였고 36명은 하전방절제술을, 7명은 복회음절제술을 시행하였다. 결 과: 적정군과 비적정군 사이에, 치료반응 등급 3 이상의 치료반응(83.3% vs. 67.7%, p=0.456), 수술 전과 비교한 수술 후의 병기하강(75.0% vs. 67.7%, p=0.727), 주변절제연 2 mm 초과의 획득(66.7% vs. 83.9%, p=0.237) 등에서 통계적으로 유의하게 차이를 보이지는 않았으나, 병변의 위치가 항문에서 5 cm 이내에 위치한 경우 비적정군에서 괄약근 보존 수술을 시행한 비율이 적정군에 비하여 더 낮은 경향을 보였다(75% vs. 100%, p=0.068). 모든 환자에서 3도 이상의 독성은 관찰되지 않았다. 결 론: 비적정군에서 치료에 수반되는 독성은 낮았으나 모두 2도 이하였고, 항문에서 5 cm 이내에 위치한 직장암의 수술 시 괄약근 보존 수술률이 더 낮은 경향을 보여 적정 화학요법의 병행을 시행하는 것이 바람직하겠다.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제26권4호
• /
• pp.213-221
• /
• 2008

목 적: 직장암에 수술 전 항암화학요법과 방사선치료를 동시에 병용시행한 후 완치절제술 후 병리학적 완전관해율과 종양 병기 하향률에 영향을 주는 예측인자를 후향적으로 분석하여 환자에 따른 맞춤치료의 가능성을 알기 위하여 본 연구를 시도하였다. 대상 및 방법: 2000년 5월부터 2008년 3월까지 국소적으로 진행된 직장암으로 진단받고 원격전이가 없는 환자 39명을 대상으로 수술 전 항암화학요법과 골반강에 방사선치료 50.4 Gy ($45{\sim}59.4\;Gy$)를 시행한 후 완치적 수술후 절제된 조직을 병리학적으로 관찰하여 완전관해율과 종양 및 림프절의 병기하향률을 측정하였다. 항암화학요법은 39명 중 38명은 방사선치료 1주와 5주에 각각 1주간 5-fluorouracil과 leucovorin을 연속적으로 정맥 주입하였으며 1명은 방사선치료기간 중 하루에 2회 capecitabine를 복용하였다. 결 과: 병리학적 완전관해를 보인 환자는 39명 중 12명(31%), 종양-병기하향을 보인 환자는 24명(63%)이었으며 임상적으로 림프절이 양성인 환자 28명 중 12명은(43%) 병리학적으로 하향되었으며 2명은 임상적으로 림프절이 음성이었으나 병리학적으로 양성을 보였다. 단변량분석에 의하면 종양의 둘레범위가 직장의 50% 미만(p=0.031), 종양의 길이가 5 cm 미만(p=0.004), 치료 후 CEA 수치가 3.0 mg/mL 이하(p=0.015)인 환자에서 병리학적 완전관해율이 높았다. 또한 선암(p=0.045), 방사선량이 50 Gy 이상(p=0.021)인 환자에서 병기-하향률이 높았고, 방사선 치료 기간이 42일 이하인(p=0.018)환자에서 림프절-병기하향률이 높았다. 다변량분석에 의하면 종양의 둘레범위가 50% 미만(HR 0.150; p=0.028), 종양의 길이가 5 cm 미만인(HR 0.084; p=0.005) 환자에서 통계학적으로 유의하게 병리학적 완전관해율이 높았으며, 방사선량이 50 Gy 이상 높은 경우(HR 0.115; p=0.025) 종양-병기하향률이 높았고 방사선치료 기간이 42일 이하인(HR 0.028; p=0.010) 경우 림프절-병기하향률이 높았다. 병리학적 완전관해에 영향을 주는 예측인자는 종양의 둘레범위와 종양의 길이이었으며, 종양-병리하향에 영향을 주는 예측인자는 방사선량, 림프절-병기하향에 영향을 주는 예측인자는 방사선치료 기간이었다. 이러한 예측인자를 파악함으로써 환자의 치료결과를 예측할 수 있으며 위험인자가 있는 환자에 좀 더 적극적인 치료계획을 설정하는 데 도움이 될 것으로 생각한다.

• Journal of Gastric Cancer
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.67-77
• /
• 2022

Purpose: Tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil (S-1) and capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) are standard adjuvant chemotherapies (ACs) administered after gastrectomy to patients with stage II or III gastric cancer. However, the efficacy of AC in elderly patients remains unclear. The objective of this retrospective multicenter cohort study was to compare the efficacies of S-1 and CAPOX AC in patients aged ≥70 years. Materials and Methods: Nine hundred eighty-three patients who were treated with AC using S-1 (768 patients) or CAPOX (215 patients) were enrolled in this study. Each patient underwent AC after curative gastrectomy for stage II or III gastric cancer at one of 27 hospitals in the Republic of Korea between January 2012 and December 2013. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed according to AC regimen and age group. Results: Of the 983 patients, 254 (25.8%) were elderly. This group had a similar RFS (P=0.099) but significantly poorer OS (p=0.003) compared with the non-elderly group. Subgroup analysis of the non-elderly group revealed no AC-associated differences in survival. Subgroup analysis of the elderly group revealed significantly better survival in the S-1 group than in the CAPOX group (RFS, P<0.001; OS, P<0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that the CAPOX regimen was an independent poor prognostic factor for RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.891; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.072-3.333; P=0.028) and OS (HR, 2.970; 95% CI, 1.550-5.692; P=0.001). Conclusions: This multicenter observational cohort study found significant differences in RFS and OS between S-1 and CAPOX AC among patients with gastric cancer aged ≥70 years.

• Journal of Digestive Cancer Research
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.36-42
• /
• 2013

배경 및 목적: Gemcitabine은 진행성 췌장암 환자의 치료에 우선적으로 사용되며, 다른 항암 약제에 비하여 상대적으로 독성이 적은 것으로 알려져 있다. 그러나 약제의 낮은 반응률과 상대적으로 높은 합병증의 발생률 때문에 많은 소화기암을 다루는 의사들은 췌장암을 가진 노인환자에서 항암치료를 꺼려하는 경항이 있다. 방법: 2007년에서 2010년 사이에 조직학적으로 췌장암을 진단받고, gemcitabine 항암요법을 시행받은 61명의 환자를 후향적으로 임상적, 검사실 및 영상학적 자료를 분석하였다. 환자는 65세 이상군 28명과 65세 미만군 38명으로 나누었다. Gemcitabine은 체표면적당 1,000 mg을 3주 동안 매주 30분에 걸쳐 투여하였고, 다른 항암제인 cisplatin, capecitabine, erlotinib 등을 병합 투여한 경우가 있었다. 결과: 환자의 평균 나이는 65세 이상군에서 71세, 65세 미만군에서 56세 였다. 진단 시 시행한 CA 19-9을 포함한 검사실검사는 두 군 간에 차이가 없었으며, gemcitabine 단독 항암요법을 시행한 경우는 65세 이상군에서 더 많았고(56.5 vs. 26.3%, p=0.029), 2차 혹은 3차 항암요법을 시행한 군은 65세 미만군에서 더 많았다(17.4 vs. 50.0%, p=0.014). 담관염이나 담관스텐트 유치는 양군에서 차이가 없었다. 결과: Gemcitabine 항암화학요법은 진행성 췌장암을 가진 노인환자에서 안전하게 사용할 수 있으며, 젊은 환자들에 견줄만한 치료 반응률과 무진행생존기간을 기대할 수 있을 것으로 예상된다.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제14권4호
• /
• pp.2283-2288
• /
• 2013

Background: Efficacy of chemotherapy plus bevacizumab has been shown in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) compared with chemotherapy alone. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI or XELIRI regimens in combination with bevacizumab for mCRC patients in a first-line setting. Materials and Methods: A total of 132 patients with previously untreated and histologically confirmed mCRC were included. They were treated with either FOLFIRI-Bevacizumab (Bev) or XELIRI-Bev according to physician preference. The efficacy and safety of the two regimens were compared. Results: Between 2006 and 2010, 68 patients were treated with the XELIRI-Bev regimen, while the remaining 64 patients received the FOLFIRI-Bev regimen. The median age was 58.5 years (53.6 years in the FOLFIRI-Bev and 59.7 years in the XELIRI-Bev arm, p=0.01). Objective response rate was 51.6% for FOLFIRI-Bev versus 41.2% for XELIRI-Bev (p=0.38). At the median follow-up of 24.5 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was not different between two groups (14.2 months in FOLFIRI-Bev vs. not reached in the XELIRI-Bev, p=0.30). However, median overall survival time for the FOLFIRI-Bev arm was better than that for patients treated with XELIRIBev, but these differences was not statistically significant (37.8 months vs. 28.7 months, respectively, p=0.58). Most commonly reported grade 3-4 toxicities (FOLFIRI-Bev vs XELIRI-Bev) were nausea/vomiting (7.8% vs. 14.7%, p=0.27), diarrhea (10.9% vs 22.1%, p=0.10), hand-foot syndrome (0% vs 8.8%, p=0.02) and neutropenia (18.7% vs 27.9%, p=0.22). Conclusion: Our results showed that FOLFIRI-Bev and XELIRI-Bev regimens were similarly effective treatments in a first-line setting for patients with untreated mCRC, with manageable adverse event profiles.

• Journal of Gastric Cancer
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.264-273
• /
• 2018

Purpose: To investigate the current status of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) regimens in Korea and the difference in efficacy of AC administered by surgical and medical oncologists in patients with stage II or III gastric cancers. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective observational study among 1,049 patients who underwent curative resection and received AC for stage II and III gastric cancers between February 2012 and December 2013 at 29 tertiary referral university hospitals in Korea. To minimize the influence of potential confounders on selection bias, propensity score matching (PSM) was used based on binary logistic regression analysis. The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were compared between patients who received AC administered by medical oncologists or surgical oncologists. Results: Between February 2012 and December 2013 in Korea, the most commonly prescribed AC by medical oncologists was tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil (S-1, 47.72%), followed by capecitabine with oxaliplatin (XELOX, 16.33%). After performing PSM, surgical oncologists (82.74%) completed AC as planned more often than medical oncologists (75.9%), with statistical significance (P=0.036). No difference in the 3-year DFS rates of stage II (P=0.567) or stage III (P=0.545) gastric cancer was found between the medical and surgical oncologist groups. Conclusions: S-1 monotherapy and XELOX are a main stay of AC, regardless of whether the prescribing physician is a medical or surgical oncologist. The better compliance with AC by surgical oncologists is a valid reason to advocate that surgical oncologists perform the treatment of AC for stage II or III gastric cancers.