• 산업진흥연구
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.11-20
• /
• 2021

본 연구는 지방대학 거점의 시대에 맞추어, 학교 주변 혁신파크 생태계 조성을 통해 지역경제 활성화와 일자리 창출 등 환경 기반 조성을 목적으로 2021년 02월 15일부터 02월 21일까지 6일간에 걸쳐 기업체, 개인사업자, 개인(창업예정자) 및 2021년 지방 S대 캠퍼스 혁신파크 입주의향서에 기재된 업체를 포함한 총 402명을 대상으로 고객 수요에 대한 현황을 조사하였다. 회귀분석 결과 캠퍼스 혁신파크 수요자 중심의 수립방안에 영향을 미치는 요인으로는 미래지향적(47%)으로 나타났고(p<.05), 표준화 계수 𝛽값은 미래지향적(𝛽=.479), 환경분석 및 정책(𝛽=.047)으로 분석되었으며, 혁신파크 수요자 중심에는 환경분석 및 정책 보다 미래지향적이 더 큰 영향력이 미치는 것으로 확인되었다. 본 연구는 지방 S대학교 캠퍼스 혁신파크 조성사업과 관련된 수요자와 기업체 요구사항을 파악하여 효율적인 혁신파크 조성 수립방안을 제시하는데 연구의 의의가 있다.

• World Technopolis Review
• /
• 제3권3호
• /
• pp.114-121
• /
• 2014

This paper presents two cases of Science and Technology Parks (STPs), from Malaysia and India, that are driven by business organisations in partnership with governments. The need to locate the STP near to a university or a research institute has been considered crucial to attract firms to the STP - but in this paper, we illustrate the efforts to develop a locally relevant STP through the cases of Pahang Bio Science in Malaysia and the ICICI Knowledge Park (now known as IKP) in Hyderabad India. These two developments are anchored by business organisations that are playing a pivotal role in their development. The government plays a supporting role in terms of policy and supplying certain complementary resources. In addition, we note that the government support also provides legitimacy for the business organisation developing the STP. In the case of the Malaysian STP, we note the approach is towards inclusive development by developing linkages to local communities, and in the case of the Indian STP, one can see the development of the STP in a dynamic way changing according to the needs of the sector. Especially interesting is the foresight by the nodal business organisations in developing the STPs.

• World Technopolis Review
• /
• 제4권2호
• /
• pp.87-103
• /
• 2015

This paper aims to explore how firms develop and grow in regional clusters based in a developing country. The argument is that start-ups / small and large firms are able to grow by developing linkages or networks for resources within clusters - and this tenet is based on studies of firms that are based from such clusters as Silicon Valley in the US, Cambridge in UK and other clusters from which have evolved over long periods of time. Most of the time we hear narratives from the developed world where there are brownfield cluster development efforts. In developing countries governments are making efforts to develop clusters from scratch - which in this paper we term as greenfield cluster versus a brownfield development, which is where the cluster is developed based on existing and new organisations in a region. In this paper, we believe the context of clusters can be important in determining the way firms develop linkages for their growth - and we look at two contexts in Malaysia ie. A greenfield cluster and a brownfield cluster. The paper presents findings from case studies of firms in a greenfield cluster (Cyberjaya) and a brown field cluster (Penang) in Malaysia. The cases reveal fairly different approaches to development of linkages or networks, which we hope will provides insights to cluster development officials and policy makers and implications to researchers for developing studies of clusters and innovation systems.