• Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain
• /
• 제21권2호
• /
• pp.305-315
• /
• 1996

This study was performed to investigate the changes of head posture according to natural standing or sitting posture. Twenty seven healthy dental students without any signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders participated in this study. Cervical resting posture (CRP) of the head in sagittal plane was measured by Cervical-Range-of-Motion $^\textregistered$(CROM, U.S.A.) and lateral cephalograph was taken in natural posture. The items related to angle in cephalograph were the angles of cranial and cervical inclination to true vertical line(VER/NSL, VER/AML), the angles of cervical inclination to nasion-sella line(CVT/NSL, OPT/NSL), the angles of comical inclination to horizontal line(CVT/HOR, OPT/HOR), the angle of cervical lordosis(CVT/OPT). The items related to line measurement were the distance from subocciput to Cl(Dl), Cl to C2(D2), C2 to C3(D3), C3 to C4(D4), the upper(PNS to posterior pharyngeal wall) and the lower(tongue base to posterior pharyngeal wall) pharyngeal space, the distance from nation to mention(Na-Me), and the radius of comical curvature from the first comical vertebra(Cl ) to the fifth cervical vertebra(C5). The data were analyzed with SAS/STAT program. The obtained results were as follows : 1. Most items related to angular measurement showed significant difference between in standing and sitting posture. The angles of CRP, CVT/NSL, OPT/NSL, CVT/HOR, OPT/HOR, and CVT/OPT were high in sitting posture, but the angles of VER/NSL, VER/NSL were low in sitting posture. 2. In vertebral distance, only the distance between C3 and C4 was differed by the posture, which decreased in sitting posture. In sitting posture, the distance from nasion to menton(Na-Me) was longer, but the radius was shorter than in standing posture. 3. Correlationship in angular measurements was almost same in both postures. Ceervical resting posture(CRP) was correlated with VER/NSL, VER\ulcornerNSL was correlated with CRP, CVT/NSL, and OPT/NSL, VER/AML was correlated with CVT/HOR, OPT/HOR, CVT/OPT, and the angle of cervical lordosis(CVT/OPT) was correlated with the radius. 4. Correlationship in linear measurement was observed only in among D3, D4, and radius. And the Na-Me was not correlated with any other items. From this results, The author concluded that the head posture in sitting was mote backward extended than in standing.

• Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain
• /
• 제21권2호
• /
• pp.393-405
• /
• 1996

This study was performed to investigate the effects of changes of head posture and cervical spine shape on the mandibular resting or clenching electromyographic(EMG) activity in anterior temporalis(TA), masseter(MM), sternocleidomastoid muscle(SCM) and trapezius insertion(TI). 30 patients with Temporomandibular Disorders(TMDs) participated in this study. EMG activity($\mu$V) at rest and clenching was observed in four head postures, namely natural head posture(NHP), forward head posture(FHP), upward head posture(UHP), and downward head posture(DHP). For taking in upward or downward head posture head was inclined 10$^{\circ}$ upward or downward and CROM$^\textregistered$(cervical-range-of motion, Performance attainment Inc., USA) was used to maintain same posture during the procedure, and BioEMG$^\textregistered$ (Bioelectromyograph, Bioresearch Inc., USA) was used to record EMG activity in the above four muscles at eight locations on both sides. The recorded EMG activity($\mu\textrm{V}$) were compared and analyzed by cervical spine shape such as the head position from plum line, cervical curvature, and cervical inclination. Head position from plum line was measured in vertical plate calibrated with cm scale, comical curvature by radius was measured with adjustable curved ruler, and cervical inclination by cervical vertebrae tangent(CVT)was measured in lateral cephalograph. The results obtained were as follows : 1. Mean value of head position from plum line, cervical curvature, and cervical inclination were 4.8cm, 26.7cm, and 86.6$^{\circ}$, respectively, And There were no correlationship among these items. 2. For resting EMG activity by head posture, the value in anterior temporalis was higher at FHP than at DHP, the value in masseter was higher at FHP than at NHP, and DHP, the value in sternocleidomastoid muscle was higher at UHP than at NHP, and the value in trapezius insertion was higher at FHP and DHP than, NHP and UHP. The clenching EMG activity, however, did not show any difference by head posture. 3. Comparison of resting and clenching EMG activity between higher and lower groups by head position from plum line, cervical curvature, and cervical inclination did not show any significant difference. From this result, the author concluded that the cervical spine shape had not significantly affected to EMG activity in usual patients with TMDs.

• Journal of Acupuncture Research
• /
• 제30권4호
• /
• pp.25-33
• /
• 2013

Objectives : To assess the test-retest reliability and the intratest repeatability in measuring the cervical range of motion of healthy subjects with wireless microelectromechanical system inertial measurement unit(MEMS-IMU) system and to discuss the feasibility of this system in the clinical setting to evaluate the cervical spine musculoskeletal. Methods : 12 healthy people who were evaluated as no- or mild-disability with neck disability index were participated. Their cervical motion were measured with IMU twice in consecutive two days for the test-retest reliability study. Intratest repeatability was calculated in the two tests separately. The calculated intraclass correlation coefficients(ICC) were discussed and compared with the those of the previous studies. Results : Cervical range of motion data were acquired and statistically processed: left rotation($61.64^{\circ}$), right rotation($65.12^{\circ}$), extension($61.98^{\circ}$), flexion($52.81^{\circ}$), left bending($39.31^{\circ}$), right bending($41.08^{\circ}$). ICCs were 0.77~0.98(intratest repeatability) and 0.74~0.93 (test-retest reliability) in the primary motion. In the coupling motion, intratest repeatability ICCs were 0.93~ 0.99(transverse primary plane), 0.88~0.97(saggital primay plane), and 0.77~0.93(coronal primary plane). Test-retest reliability of coupling motion were 0.90~0.97(transverse primary plane), 0.00~0.72(saggital primary plane), and 0.04~0.76(coronal primary plane). Conclusions : Several types of range-of-motion devices are now on use in many fields including medicine, but the practicality of the devices in clinical use is questionable for the convenient and economical aspects. In this study, we presented the reliability of cervical range of motion test with the developed wireless MEMS-IMU system and discussed its potential utility in clinical use.

• 한국엔터테인먼트산업학회논문지
• /
• 제13권5호
• /
• pp.239-246
• /
• 2019

본 연구는 여대생의 라이프 케어 증진을 위한 둥근 어깨 자세의 작은가슴근, 어깨 가동성, 목 관절 가동 범위 의 상관관계를 알아보았다. 둥근 어깨 자세를 가진 성인 여성 80명을 대상자로 선정하였다. 대상자가 누운 자세에서 어깨의 높이를 측정하여 둥근 어깨 자세를 측정하였고, 작은가슴근의 길이, 어깨 가동성, 목 관절가동범위를 측정하여 상관분석을 한 결과는 다음과 같다. 오른쪽 둥근 어깨와 목 폄의 상관계수는 -.23(p<0.05)이었다. 오른쪽 작은가슴근 지수와 목 왼쪽 가쪽 굽힘의 상관계수는 -.25(p<0.05)이었고, 오른쪽 작은가슴근 지수와 목 굽힘 상관계수는 -.25(p<0.5)이었다. 왼쪽 어깨 가동성과 목 왼쪽 가쪽 굽힘의 상관계수는 -.23(p<0.05)이었고, 왼쪽 어깨 가동성과 목 오른쪽 돌림의 상관계수는 -.23(p<0.5)이었으며, 왼쪽 어깨 가동성과 목 왼쪽 돌림의 상관계수는 -.25(p<0.05)로 통계학적으로 유의한 음의 상관관계가 있었다(p<0.05). 이상의 결과로 오른쪽의 둥근 어깨가 심할수록 목폄이 감소하였고, 오른쪽 작은가슴근이 단축될수록 목 왼쪽 가쪽 굽힘과 목 굽힘이 감소하였으며, 왼쪽 어깨 가동성이 증가할수록 목 왼쪽 가쪽 굽힘은 감소하였고, 오른쪽 돌림과 왼쪽 돌림이 감소하였음을 알 수 있었다.

• 동의생리병리학회지
• /
• 제32권4호
• /
• pp.232-246
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this research is to contribute to clinical researches on neck pain and cervical spondylosis by reviewing the latest research trends and evaluation tools through the analyses of clinical studies on neck pain and cervical spondylosis over the last 5 years. 70 papers satisfying the selection conditions among the RCT papers that had been searched as "neck pain" or "cervical spondylosis" at Pubmed(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed) from March 2011 to February 2016 were targeted. Papers were numbered in order of their publication dates and analyzed by classifying their contents into 1) pain classification, 2) treatment type, 3) treatment duration, 4) treatment time, 5) number of participants, 6) evaluation tools and methods of research, and 7) evaluation duration. 55 papers targeted chronic neck pain, 6 papers acute and subacute neck pain, and 2 papers subacute and chronic neck pain. In comparison by intervention, 43 papers corresponded to physical therapy, 3 papers to acupuncture, 1 to herbal fomentation, 5 to medication, and 18 papers corresponded to multilateral comparisons comparing the efficacy by various interventions. In research period, there were 50 papers based on treatment period, 16 papers based on the number of treatments, and 4 papers based on different periods depending on each group. In treatment duration, the cases from 1 month or more to less than 3 months were most, followed by the cases of less than 1 month, and the cases from 3 months or more to less than 6 months. In treatment frequency, the number of treatments of the treatment group was the same as that of the control group in 51 papers, and many treatments were conducted by the methods of acupuncture, manual therapy, and injection therapy in cases of once or twice of treatments, and physical therapy and electroacupuncture corresponded mainly to the cases from 3 times or more to less than 10 times of treatments, and retrospective observation and exercise programs corresponded mainly to the cases of more than 30 times of treatments. In the number of subjects of the researches, the cases from 50 or more to less than 100 were most, followed by the cases from 20 or more to less than 50. There were 7 evaluation tools cited 10 times or more: VAS, NRS, PPT, NDI, NPQ, CROM, and SF-36. In evaluation period, 37 papers evaluated only during the treatment period, and 33 papers conducted follow-up. In follow-up period, the cases of less than 3 months were most, followed by the cases from 6 months or more to less than 1 year, and the cases from 3 months or more to less than 6 months. When planning clinical researches on cervical pain in the future, appropriate intervention methods, frequency and duration of treatment, period of follow-up, appropriate number of subjects and selection of evaluation tools for objective validity will have to be considered. In addition, randomization, double-blind, etc. will have to be considered for researches with high basis level.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제11권11호
• /
• pp.4346-4353
• /
• 2010

본 연구의 목적은 20대의 정상 성인에서 경부의 관절가동범위와 마사지 및 정적 스트레칭이 관절가동범위에 미치는 영향을 측정하는 것이다. 근골격계와 신경계의 질환이 없는 100명(마사지그룹=50, 스트레칭그룹=50)을 대상으로 실시하였다. 마사지와 정적 스트레칭은 흉쇄유돌근, 사각근, 승모근, 반극근, 판상근, 후두하근, 다열근과 회선근에 적용되었다. 두 그룹은 주 3회의 중재를 받았다. 중재 시간은 10분이었다. 마사지그룹은 경찰법, 유날법 및 스트라이핑 마사지가 사용되었고, 스트레칭그룹은 정적 스트레칭이 사용되었다. 경부의 가동범위 측정도구는 경부의 8가지 동작(후두하 굽힘과 폄, 경부의 굽힘과 폄, 왼쪽 옆굽힘과 오른쪽 옆굽힘, 왼쪽 돌림과 오른쪽 돌림)을 분석하기 위하여 사용되었다. 통계학적 분석결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 정상적인 경부의 관절가동범위는 남자에서 후두하굽힘과 폄이 $2.39^{\circ}$와 38.36^{\circ}$, 경부의 굽힘과 폄이 $54.11^{\circ}$와 69.39^{\circ}$, 왼쪽과 오른쪽의 옆굽힘이 $43.50^{\circ}$와 $41.28^{\circ}$, 왼쪽과 오른쪽의 돌림이 $66.39^{\circ}$와 $65.94^{\circ}$로 나타났고, 여자에서는 후두하 굽힘과 폄이 $5.14^{\circ}$와 $36.47^{\circ}$, 경부의 굽힘과 폄이 $55.92^{\circ}$와 $71.22^{\circ}$, 왼쪽과 오른쪽의 옆굽힘이 $43.34^{\circ}$와 $41.06^{\circ}$, 왼쪽과 오른쪽의 돌림이 $69.38^{\circ}$와 $68.63^{\circ}$로 나타났다. 둘째, 후두하 굽힘, 왼쪽 돌림과 오른쪽 돌림에서 여성이 남성보다 더 높은 관절가동범위를 보였다(p<0.05). 셋째, 마사지군과 스트레칭군은 치료 후에 모든 항목에서 관절가동범위의 증가를 보였지만 두 그룹간의 비교에서는 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다(p<0.05). 위의 결과는 마사지와 정적 스트레칭이 경부 근육의 신장 및 이완을 통해 가동범위를 증가시키는 적당한 방법이라는 것을 제시한다. 그리고 경부의 가동범위를 조사하는 연구의 기초로 제공될 수 있을 것이다.

• Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain
• /
• 제25권2호
• /
• pp.173-189
• /
• 2000

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of specific head positions on the mandibular rotational torque movements in maximum mouth opening, protrusion and lateral excursion. Thirty dental students without any sign or symptom of temporomandibular disorders(TMDs) were included as a control group and 90 patients with TMDs were selected and examined by routine diagnostic procedure for TMDs including radiographs and were classified into 3 subgroups : disc displacement with reduction, disc displacement without reduction, and degenerative joint disease. Mandibular rotational torque movements were observed in four head postures: upright head posture(NHP), upward head posture(UHP), downward head posture(DHP), and forward head posture(FHP). For UHP, the head was inclined 30 degrees upward: for DHP, the head was inclined 30 degrees downward: for FHP, the head was positioned 4cm forward. These positions were adjusted with the use of cervical range-of-motion instrumentation(CROM, Performance Attainment Inc., St. Paul, U.S.A.). Mandibular rotational torque movements were monitored with the Rotate program of BioPAK system (Bioresearch Inc., WI, U.S.A.). The rotational torque movements in frontal and horizontal plane during mandibular border movement were recorded with two parameters: frontal rotational torque angle and horizontal rotational torque angle. The data obtained was analyzed by the SAS/Stat program. The obtained results were as follows : 1. The control group showed significantly larger mandibular rotational angles in UHP than those in DHP and FHP during maximum mouth opening in both frontal and horizontal planes. Disc displacement with reduction group showed significantly larger mandibular rotational angles in DHP and FHP than those in NHP during lateral excursion to the affected and non-affected sides in both frontal and horizontal planes(p<0.05). 2. Disc displacement without reduction group showed significantly larger mandibular rotational angles in FHP than those in any other head postures during maximum mouth opening as well as lateral excursion to the affected and non-affected sides in both frontal and horizontal planes. Degenerative joint disease group showed significantly larger mandibular rotational angles in FHP than those in any other head postures during maximum mouth opening, protrusion and lateral excursion in both frontal and horizontal planes(p<0.05). 3. In NHP, mandibular rotational angle of the control group was significantly larger than that of any other patient subgroups. Mandibular rotational angle of disc displacement with reduction group was significantly larger than that of disc displacement without reduction group during maximum mouth opening in the frontal plane. Mandibular rotational angle of disc displacement without reduction group was significantly larger than that of disc displacement with reduction group or degenerative joint disease group during maximum mouth opening in the horizontal plane(p<0.05). 4. In NHP, mandibular rotational angles of disc displacement without reduction group were significantly larger than those of the control group or disc displacement with reduction group during lateral excursion to the affected side in both frontal and horizontal planes. Mandibular rotational angle of disc displacement without reduction group was significantly smaller than that of the control group during lateral excursion to the non-affected side in frontal plane. Mandibular rotational angle of disc displacement without reduction group was significantly larger than that of disc displacement with reduction group during lateral excursion to the non-affected side in the horizontal plane(p<0.05). 5. In NHP, mandibular rotational angle of the control group was significantly smaller than that of disc displacement with reduction group or disc displacement without reduction group during protrusion in the frontal plane. Mandibular rotational angle of disc displacement without reduction group was significantly larger than that of the disc displacement with reduction group or degenerative joint disease group during protrusion in the horizontal plane. Mandibular rotational angle of the control group was significantly smaller than that of disc displacement without reduction group or degenerative joint disease group during protrusion in the horizontal plane(p<0.05). 6. In NHP, disc displacement without reduction group and degenerative joint disease group showed significantly larger mandibular rotational angles during lateral excursion to the affected side than during lateral excursion to the non-affected side in both frontal and horizontal planes(p<0.05). The findings indicate that changes in head posture can influence mandibular rotational torque movements. The more advanced state is a progressive stage of TMDs, the more influenced by FHP are mandibular rotational torque movements of the patients with TMDs.