• 제목/요약/키워드: CLTC

검색결과 2건 처리시간 0.017초

기계번역을 이용한 교차언어 문서 범주화의 분류 성능 분석 (Classification Performance Analysis of Cross-Language Text Categorization using Machine Translation)

  • 이용구
    • 한국문헌정보학회지
    • /
    • 제43권1호
    • /
    • pp.313-332
    • /
    • 2009
  • 교차언어 문서 범주화(CLTC)는 다른 언어로 된 학습집단을 이용하여 문헌을 자동 분류할 수 있다. 이 연구는 KTSET으로부터 CLTC에 적합한 실험문헌집단을 추출하고, 기계 번역기를 이용하여 가능한 여러 CLTC 방법의 분류 성능을 비교하였다. 분류기는 SVM 분류기를 이용하였다. 실험 결과, CLTC 중에 다국어 학습방법이 가장 좋은 분류 성능을 보였으며, 학습집단 번역방법, 검증집단 번역방법 순으로 분류 성능이 낮아졌다. 하지만 학습집단 번역방법이 기계번역 측면에서 효율적이며, 일반적인 환경에 쉽게 적용할 수 있고, 비교적 분류 성능이 좋아 CLTC 방법 중에서 가장 높은 이용 가능성을 보였다. 한편 CLTC에서 기계번역을 이용하였을 때 번역과정에서 발생하는 자질축소나 주제적 특성이 없는 자질로의 번역으로 인해 성능 저하를 가져왔다.

Effects of air-abrasion pressure on the resin bond strength to zirconia: a combined cyclic loading and thermocycling aging study

  • Al-Shehri, Eman Z.;Al-Zain, Afnan O.;Sabrah, Alaa H.;Al-Angari, Sarah S.;Dehailan, Laila Al;Eckert, George J.;Ozcan, Mutlu;Platt, Jeffrey A.;Bottino, Marco C.
    • Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
    • /
    • 제42권3호
    • /
    • pp.206-215
    • /
    • 2017
  • Objectives: To determine the combined effect of fatigue cyclic loading and thermocycling (CLTC) on the shear bond strength (SBS) of a resin cement to zirconia surfaces that were previously air-abraded with aluminum oxide ($Al_2O_3$) particles at different pressures. Materials and Methods: Seventy-two cuboid zirconia specimens were prepared and randomly assigned to 3 groups according to the air-abrasion pressures (1, 2, and 2.8 bar), and each group was further divided into 2 groups depending on aging parameters (n = 12). Panavia F 2.0 was placed on pre-conditioned zirconia surfaces, and SBS testing was performed either after 24 hours or 10,000 fatigue cycles (cyclic loading) and 5,000 thermocycles. Non-contact profilometry was used to measure surface roughness. Failure modes were evaluated under optical and scanning electron microscopy. The data were analyzed using 2-way analysis of variance and ${\chi}^2$ tests (${\alpha}=0.05$). Results: The 2.8 bar group showed significantly higher surface roughness compared to the 1 bar group (p < 0.05). The interaction between pressure and time/cycling was not significant on SBS, and pressure did not have a significant effect either. SBS was significantly higher (p = 0.006) for 24 hours storage compared to CLTC. The 2 bar-CLTC group presented significantly higher percentage of pre-test failure during fatigue compared to the other groups. Mixed-failure mode was more frequent than adhesive failure. Conclusions: CLTC significantly decreased the SBS values regardless of the air-abrasion pressure used.