• Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain
• /
• 제31권1호
• /
• pp.59-67
• /
• 2006

발치 등 치과치료 후에 발생한 하악신경의 감각이상(이감각증)으로 인해 발음문제를 호소하는 환자들이 있지만, 감각신경의 이상과 운동구어능력 사이의 직접적인 관련성에 대해서는 논란이 존재한다. 본 연구의 목적은 편측 하악 신경의 마취로 인한 일시적인 감각손상이 운동구어능력에 미치는 영향을 평가하여 감각이상과 운동구어능력과의 관련성을 밝히고자 하였다. 본 연구는 단국대학교 치과대학에 재학중인 학생들 중 표준어를 구사하는 건강한 지원자 10명 (남:녀=7:3)을 대상으로 통법에 따라 우측 하치조신경, 설신경, 장협신경의 마취를 시행하였다. 주관적인 평가를 위해 대상자들은 마취전, 마취 후 30초, 30분, 60분, 90분, 120분, 150분, 180분에 마취 심도와 주관적으로 느끼는 발음불편감의 정도를 VAS로 기록하게 하였고, 운동 구어능력을 객관적으로 평가하기 위해 선택된 문장과 단어를 각각의 경과시간 마다 피검자에게 읽도록 하여 녹음하고 채취된 녹음샘플을 Computerized Speech $Lab^{(R)}$, Model 4500을 사용하여 발화속도, 교호운동력, 억양, 음성진전, 발음을 평가하였다. 실험 결과, 마취에 의한 주관적인 발음불편감 정도는 마취 후 60분에서 최고조에 이르고 이후 점점 감소하는데, 이는 주관적 마취 심도의 증감과 상당한 상관관계가 있었다. 주관적 마취 심도와 마취에 대한 발음불편감 정도에 따르는 다중선형회귀 분석결과, 연속발화기본 주파수에서만 통계학적으로 유의한 차이를 보였고 발화속도, 교호운동력, 음성진전 등 나머지 항목에서는 통계학적으로 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 또한, 마취 전후 발음상의 변화도 관찰되지 않았다. 즉, 편측 하악 전달마취는 마취의 증감에 따라 주관적인 발음불편은 변화하지만, 객관적 항목에서 운동구어능력에는 뚜렷한 영향을 미친다고 볼 수는 없었다. 그러므로 편측 하악의 감각손상이 운동구어능력에 뚜렷한 영향을 미친다고 볼 수는 없는 것으로 사료된다.

• Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
• /
• 제22권5호
• /
• pp.339-348
• /
• 2022

Background: To compare the anesthetic efficacy of supplemental buccal infiltration (BI) (1.7 ml) versus intraligamentary (IL) injection containing 0.4 ml of 4% articaine with 1:100.000 epinephrine after an inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) with 1.7 ml 2% lidocaine in the first and second mandibular molars diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis (IP). Methods: One hundred subjects diagnosed with IP of either the mandibular first (n = 50) or second molars (n = 50) and failed profound anesthesia following an IANB were selected. They randomly received either the IL or BI techniques of anesthesia. Pain scores on a 170 mm Heft-Parker visual analog scale were recorded initially, before, and during supplemental injections. Furthermore, pulse rate was measured before and after each supplemental injection. During the access cavity preparation and initial filing, no or mild pain was assumed to indicate anesthetic success. The chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U test, and independent samples t-test were used for the analyses. Results: The overall success rates were 80% in the IL group and 74% in the BI group, with no significant difference (P = 0.63). In the first molars, there was no significant difference between the two techniques (P = 0.088). In the second molars, IL injection resulted in a significantly higher success rate (P = 0.017) than BI. IL injection was statistically more successful (P = 0.034) in the second molars (92%) than in the first molars (68%). However, BI was significantly more successful (P = 0.047) in the first molars (88%) than in the second molars (64%). The mean pulse rate increase was significantly higher in the IL group than in the BI group (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Both the IL and BI techniques were advantageous when used as supplemental injections. However, more favorable outcomes were observed when the second molars received IL injection and the first molars received BI.

• Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
• /
• 제21권4호
• /
• pp.283-309
• /
• 2021

Achieving profound anesthesia in mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis is a tedious task. This review aimed at evaluating the success of buccal/lingual infiltrations administered with a primary inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) injection or as a supplemental injection after the failure of the primary injection in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with irreversible pulpitis in human mandibular molars. The review question was "What will be the success of primary and supplemental infiltration injection in the endodontic treatment of patients with irreversible pulpitis in human mandibular molars?" We searched electronic databases, including Pubmed, Scopus, and Ebsco host and we did a comprehensive manual search. The review protocol was framed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist. We included clinical studies that evaluated and compared the anesthetic outcomes of primary IANB with primary and/or supplementary infiltration injections. Standard evaluation of the included studies was performed and suitable data and inferences were assessed. Twenty-six studies were included, of which 13 were selected for the meta-analysis. In the forest plot representation of the studies evaluating infiltrations, the combined risk ratio (RR) was 1.88 (95% CI: 1.49, 2.37), in favor of the secondary infiltrations with a statistical heterogeneity of 77%. The forest plot analysis for studies comparing primary IANB + infiltration versus primary IANB alone showed a low heterogeneity (0%). The included studies had similar RRs and the combined RR was 1.84 (95% CI: 1.44, 2.34). These findings suggest that supplemental infiltrations given along with a primary IANB provide a better success rate. L'Abbe plots were generated to measure the statistical heterogeneity among the studies. Trial sequential analysis suggested that the number of patients included in the analysis was adequate. Based on the qualitative and quantitative analyses, we concluded that the infiltration technique, either as a primary injection or as a supplementary injection, given after the failure of primary IANB, increases the overall anesthetic efficacy.