• 제목/요약/키워드: Bile Duct Neoplasms

검색결과 12건 처리시간 0.017초

복부 림프절의 명명법 및 림프 배액 패턴 (Nomenclature and Lymphatic Drainage Patterns of Abdominal Lymph Nodes)

  • 조현석;안지현
    • 대한영상의학회지
    • /
    • 제83권6호
    • /
    • pp.1240-1258
    • /
    • 2022
  • 림프계는 염증 및 악성 세포의 확산 경로를 제공한다. 종양이 확산되는 림프절의 위치와 림프 배액 경로를 인지하는 것은 종양의 병기 결정, 치료 방법 선택 및 환자의 예후 예측에 중요하다. 복강 내 악성 종양에서 림프절 전이는 흔하기 때문에 림프절 전이를 발견하고 질병의 확산 방식을 이해하는 것은 영상의학과 의사에게 필수적이다. 이 임상화보에서는 도식적인 그림들과 림프절을 색으로 표시한 CT 영상을 사용하여, 상부 및 하부 위장관, 간, 담낭, 담관 및 췌장의 림프절 위치와 이름, 그리고 림프 배수 경로에 관해 기술하였다. 또한 각 장기에서 발생하는 악성 종양의 국소 림프절의 종류에 대해 기술하고 몇몇 증례의 영상을 제시하였다.

Additional Value of Integrated 18F-FDG PET/MRI for Evaluating Biliary Tract Cancer: Comparison with Contrast-Enhanced CT

  • Jeongin Yoo;Jeong Min Lee;Jeong Hee Yoon;Ijin Joo;Dong Ho Lee
    • Korean Journal of Radiology
    • /
    • 제22권5호
    • /
    • pp.714-724
    • /
    • 2021
  • Objective: To evaluate the value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/MRI added to contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) in initial staging, assessment of resectability, and postoperative follow-up of biliary tract cancer. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 100 patients (initial workup [n = 65] and postoperative follow-up [n = 35]) who had undergone PET/MRI and CECT for bile duct or gallbladder lesions between January 2013 and March 2020. Two radiologists independently reviewed the CECT imaging set and CECT plus PET/MRI set to determine the likelihood of malignancy, local and overall resectability, and distant metastasis in the initial workup group, and local recurrence and distant metastasis in the follow-up group. Diagnostic performances of the two imaging sets were compared using clinical-surgical-pathologic findings as standards of reference. Results: The diagnostic performance of CECT significantly improved after the addition of PET/MRI for liver metastasis (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [Az]: 0.77 vs. 0.91 [p = 0.027] for reviewer 1; 0.76 vs. 0.92 [p = 0.021] for reviewer 2), lymph node metastasis (0.73 vs. 0.92 [p = 0.004]; 0.81 vs. 0.92 [p = 0.023]), and overall resectability (0.79 vs. 0.92 [p = 0.007]; 0.82 vs. 0.94 [p = 0.021]) in the initial workup group. In the follow-up group, the diagnostic performance of CECT plus PET/MRI was significantly higher than that of CECT imaging for local recurrence (0.81 vs. 1.00 [p = 0.029]; 0.82 vs. 0.94 [p = 0.045]). Conclusion: PET/MRI may add value to CECT in patients with biliary tract cancer both in the initial workup for staging and determination of overall resectability and in follow-up for local recurrence.