• Title/Summary/Keyword: Bi-linear Stress-Strain Curve

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.018 seconds

Bi-linear Stress-Strain Curves for Considering Cyclic Hardening Behavior of Materials in the Nonlinear FE Analysis under Seismic Loading Conditions (지진하중 조건의 비선형 유한요소해석에서 반복경화 거동 고려를 위한 Bi-linear 응력-변형률 곡선)

  • Jeong, Hyun Joon;Kim, Jin Weon;Kim, Jong Sung;Koo, Gyeong Hoi
    • Transactions of the Korean Society of Pressure Vessels and Piping
    • /
    • v.14 no.2
    • /
    • pp.59-68
    • /
    • 2018
  • This study compares true stress-true strain curves obtained by tensile tests of various piping materials with bi-linear stress-strain approximation suggested in the JSME Code Case(CC) Draft, a guideline for piping seismic inelastic response analysis. Based on the comparisons, the reliability of the bi-linear approximation is evaluated. It is found that bi-linear stress-strain curve of TP316 stainless steel is in good agreement with its true stress-true strain curve. However, Bi-linear stress-strain curves of TP304 stainless steel and carbon steels determined by the approximation cannot appropriately estimate their stress-strain behavior. Accordingly new bi-linear approximations for carbon steels and low-alloy steels are proposed. The proposed bi-linear approximations for carbon and low-alloy steels, which include the temperature effect on strength and hardening of material, estimate their stress-strain behavior reasonably well.

New emerging surface treatment of GFRP Hybrid bar for stronger durability of concrete structures

  • Park, Cheolwoo;Park, Younghwan;Kim, Seungwon;Ju, Minkwan
    • Smart Structures and Systems
    • /
    • v.17 no.4
    • /
    • pp.593-610
    • /
    • 2016
  • In this study, an innovative and smart glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) hybrid bar was developed for stronger durability of concrete structures. As comparing with the conventional GFRP bar, the smart GFRP Hybrid bar can promise to enhance the modulus of elasticity so that it makes the cracking reduced than the case when the conventional GFRP bar is used. Besides, the GFRP Hybrid bar can effectively resist the corrosion of conventional steel bar by the GFRP outer surface on the steel bar. In order to verify the bond performance of the GFRP hybrid bar for structural reinforcement, uniaxial pull-out test was conducted. The variables were the bar diameter and the number of strands and pitch of the fiber ribs. Tensile tests showed a excellent increase in the modulus of elasticity, 152.1 GPa, as compared to that of the pure GFRP bar (50 GPa). The stress-strain curve was bi-linear, so that the ductile performance could be obtained. For the bond test, the entire GFRP hybrid bar test specimens failed in concrete splitting due to higher shear strength resulting in concrete crushing as a function of bar deformation. Investigation revealed that an increase in the number of strands of fiber ribs enhanced the bond strength, and the pitch guaranteed the bond strength of 19.1 mm diameter hybrid bar with 15.9 mm diameter of core section of deformed steel the ACI 440 1R-15 equation is regarded as more suitable for predicting the bond strength of GFRP hybrid bars, whereas the CSA S806-12 prediction is considered too conservative and is largely influenced by the bar diameter. For further study, various geometrical and material properties such as concrete cover, cross-sectional ratio, and surface treatment should be considered.