• 제목/요약/키워드: Bending Wood

검색결과 372건 처리시간 0.016초

목질(木質)플레이크와 폴리프로필렌망(網)플레이크 구성(構成)이 톱밥보오드의 팽창성(膨脹性)과 휨성질(性質)에 미치는 영향(影響) (Effect of Combining Wood Flakes and Polypropylene-net Flakes on Thickness Swelling and Bending Properties of Sawdust Board)

  • 이필우;엄영근;오세창;정인주
    • 한국산림과학회지
    • /
    • 제77권2호
    • /
    • pp.252-257
    • /
    • 1988
  • 목질(木質)플레이크 및 P.P망(網)플레이크를 톱밥보오드에 혼합하여 그 효과를 보고자 크기를 $1{\times}1cm^2$, $1.5{\times}1.5cm^2$, $1{\times}2cm^2$로 절단하고, 혼합량을 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%로하여 보오드를 제조(製造)하여 그 물리적(物理的) 및 기계적(機械的) 특성(特性)을 조사고찰(調査考察)한 바, 그 결론(結論)을 간단히 지으면 다음과 같다. 1) 플레이크를 혼합한 톱밥보오드의 두께 팽창율(膨脹率)은 혼합비가 증가함에 따라 감소(減少)하였고 P.P망(網)플레이크를 혼합한 경우에도 같은 양상을 보여주었다. 2) 휨파괴계수(破壞係數)는 플레이크 및 P.P망(網)플레이크의 혼합비가 증가할수록 증가하였다. 플레이크 크기가 $1{\times}2cm^2$인 경우 모두 대조보오드보다 높은 값을 나타내었고 P.P망(網)플레이크의 경우에는 $1.5{\times}1.5cm^2$ 크기일때 대조보오드보다 모두 높은 휨파괴계수치(破壞係數値)를 보였다. 3) 플레이크 혼합비가 증가함에 따라 휨탄성계수(彈性係數)는 증가하는 경향을 보여주었으며, 이러한 경향은 P.P망(網)플레이크를 혼합한 경우에도 동일하게 나타났다. P.P망(網)플레이크의 경우 망(網)플레이크의 면적이 커짐에 따라 휨탄성계수(彈性係數)는 증가하는 경향을 나타내었다. 4) 플레이크를 혼합한 보오드의 경우, 그 물리적(物理的), 기계적(機械的) 성질(性質)에 관여하는 주인자는 형상(形狀)으로 나타났으며, aspect ratio가 커짐에 따라 보오드의 성질(性質)이 향상되었다. P.P망(網)플레이크를 혼합한 보오드의 경우 주인자는 망(網)플레이크의 단면적으로, 단면적이 클수록 보오드의 성질(性質)을 개선(改善)시킬 수 있었다.

  • PDF

플라스틱칩 결체(結締) 톱밥보드의 기계적(機械的) 및 물리적(物理的) 성질(性質)에 관(關)한 연구(硏究) (A Study on the Mechanical and Physical Properties of Sawdustboard combined with Plastic Chip)

  • 이필우;서진석
    • Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology
    • /
    • 제15권3호
    • /
    • pp.44-55
    • /
    • 1987
  • In order to study the effect of sawdustboard combined with plastic chips, 0.5mm($T_1$), 1mm($T_2$), 1.4mm($T_3$) thick nylon fiber. polypropylene rope fiber(RP), and 0.23mm thick moth-proof polypropylene net fiber(NP) were cut into 0.5, 1, 2cm long plastic chips. Thereafter, sawdustboard combined with plastic chips prepared as the above and plastic non-combined sawdustboard(control) were manufactured into 3 types of one-, two-, and three layer with 5 or 10% combination level. By the discussions and results at this study, the significant conclusions of mechanical and physical properties were summarized as follows: 1. The MORs were shown in the order of 3 layer> 2 layer> 1 layer among plastic non-combined boards, and $T_3$ < $T_2$ < $T_1$ < RP (NP(5%) < NP(l0%) among plastic combined boards. In 2cm long plastic chip in 1 layer board, the highest strength through all the composition was recognized. 1 layer board showing the lower strength with 0.5cm plastic chip rendered to the bending strength improvement by 2 or 3 layer board composition. On the other hand, 2 or 3 layer combined with 1, 2cm long polypropylene net fiber chips incurred MOR's conspicuous decrease requiring optimum plastic chip combined level and consideration to combined type. 2. MOE in plastic non-combined 3 layer board exhibited sandwich construction effect by higher resin content application to surface layer in the order of 3layer>1layer>2layer with the highest stiffness of the board combined with polypropylene chip, while nylon chip-combined board had little difference from plastic non-combined board. In relevant to length and layer effect, 3 layer board combined with the 0.5cm long polypropylene net fiber chip in 5% and 10% combined level presented 34-43% and 44-76% stiffness increase against plastic non-combined board(control), respectively. Moreover, in 1 layer board, 30% stiffness increase with 10% against 5% combined level in the 1 and 2cm long polypropylene net fiber chip was obtained. 3. Stress at proportional limit(Spl) showing the fiber relationship (r: 0.81-0.97) between MOR presented in the order of 1 layer<2 layer<3 layer in plastic non-combined board. Correspondingly, combined effect by layer and plastic chip length was similar to MOR's. 4. Differently from previous properties(MOR, MOE, Spl). work to maximum load(Wml) of 2 layer board approached to that of 3 layer board. Conforming the above phenomenon. 2 layer combined with 0.5cm long polypropylene net fiber chip kept the greater work than 1 layer. The polypropylene combined board superior to nylon -and plastic non - combined board seemed to have greater anti - failing capacity. 5. Internal bond strength(IB), in contrast to MOR's tendency. showed in the order of T1

  • PDF