• 한국방재학회 논문집
• /
• 제11권3호
• /
• pp.201-208
• /
• 2011

하천을 설계할 때 적절한 호안공법을 선정해야 하지만 이에 대한 가이드라인이 없는 실정이다. 따라서 하천설계시 채택한 호안공법들의 적합성 여부를 판단함으로서 예산의 낭비를 막을 필요가 있다. 본 연구에서는 하천설계시 채택한 호안공법들이 적합한지를 평가하는 방법을 개발하고, 이를 8개 하천에 적용함으로서 개발된 방법의 타당성을 검토하였다. 평가방법은 계층화분석법(AHP)을 사용하였으며 각 하천에 적용된 호안 공법의 적합도(SI)를 분석하여 평가하는 방법을 사용하였다. 최적 호안공법이 선정되기 위해서는 설계대상지점의 모든 환경변수가 고려되어야 할 것이다. 따라서 설계호안을 평가하기 위해서도 대상지점이 가지고 있는 모든 변수가 포함되어야한다. 호안평가항목은 호안의 수리적 안정성, 환경생태성, 경제성, 어메니티의 4가지 항목을 사용하였으며 각 항목은 4~5개의 소항목을 포함하며 각 소항목은 대상지점의 조사결과를 반영한 자료이다. 평가방법은 8개 하천을 대상으로 적용되어 평가되었으며 설계된 호안의 SI를 판정하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 특히 자연친화적인 호안공법을 평가하는 데 적합할 것으로 생각되며 부적절하게 설계된 호안은 적절한 공법을 선정하는데 도움을 줄 수 있을 것이다.

• 한국환경복원기술학회지
• /
• 제12권3호
• /
• pp.83-97
• /
• 2009

The objects of study is to propose criteria for physical river disturbance assessment and as case study to show the application results for river improvement. For this purpose, the river disturbance assessment method for past disturbance process and the present-day potential natural state of stream is proposed. To assess the disturbance of the Youngcheon River caused by river improvement, One ares of Nam River was selected for the reference reach and two areas of Youngcheon River were selected for the comparison reach. And these reaches were surveyed and analyzed according to applying criteria of the river disturbances assessment. The assessment indices were physical factors as like epifaunal (bottom), embededness, velocity/depth regime, sediment deposition, channel flow status, channel alteration, frequency of riffles, bank stability, vegetative protection and riparian zone etc. The results showed that physical river environment in Youngcheon River area was disturbed by artificial revetment and bed excavation, consequently this disturbance give rise to impact of ecosystem in river. Hereafter, the criteria for river disturbance assessment are needed to consider various river characters as bed materials and bed slop etc.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.61-69
• /
• 2011

Integrated stream naturalness based on abiotic and biotic factors were developed. Abiotic factors considered in this study were types of land use in the riparian area, river bank and high water bed streamside, revetment, bed substrate and artificial construction of streamside. Biotic factors included types of vegetation, assemblages of fish, macroinvertebrate, bird and mammal(Otter) in streams. The presence/absence of legal species and biological assessment index were also weighted as important parameters in this study. Scoring criteria selected for each matrix was five rating system; 1=poor, 2=moderate, 3=fair, 4=good, 5=excellent. Numerical ratings for the matrix were then summed. This resulted in a minimum score of 13 if all matrix at a site were poor, and a maximum score of 65 if all matrix were excellent. Five grade system from poor(I) to excellent condition(V) was employed. To verify its validity in natural environment, the evaluation system was applied to the Gapchun stream which is a test bed selected. Our result showed that stream naturalness of each reach was clearly distinguished by biotic and abiotic characteristics. Determination of correlation coefficient between abiotic and biotic factors was also high ($R^2=0.96$, p<0.05). In conclusion, assessment for stream naturalness reflecting abiotic and biotic factors was useful method representing stream integrated.