• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제10권
• /
• pp.263-289
• /
• 1998

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제12권
• /
• pp.66-77
• /
• 2000

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제6권
• /
• pp.97-107
• /
• 1994

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제13권
• /
• pp.71-84
• /
• 2001

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제13권
• /
• pp.249-284
• /
• 2001

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제13권
• /
• pp.303-324
• /
• 2001

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제16권
• /
• pp.141-159
• /
• 2002

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제3권
• /
• pp.7-50
• /
• 1991

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제17권
• /
• pp.153-161
• /
• 2003

• 한국항공운항학회지
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.70-80
• /
• 2016

ICAO(International Civil Aviation Organization) established ICAO LPRs(Language Proficiency Requirements) which is an international standard of English for aviation to promote the aviation safety. The Republic of Korea government amended the aviation law on the 8th of November, 2005 and made EPTA(English Proficiency Test for Aviation) as a follow up action. Purpose of this research is analysing the problem of EPTA and improving it. This investigation takes a look at the current ICAO LPRs and compares the difference between EPTA and other global English proficiency requirements for aviation. The result indicated that there is a discordance between the standards of ICAO and EPTA. Also, the global English proficiency reqirements for aviation and EPTA had differences which required improvements. The study suggests to replace more job relevant questions in the EPTA and reform the level system of EPTA.