• 지적과 국토정보
• /
• 제50권2호
• /
• pp.203-219
• /
• 2020

본 연구의 주된 목적은 한국 지적 과학 분야 공동 저술 활동의 공간분포패턴을 식별하는 것이다. 분석 결과 소수의 연구자들이 한국 지적 공동 저작 네트워크에서 중요한 역할을 수행 한 것으로 나타났다. 특히 일부 저자는 네트워크의 다른 노드에 막대한 영향을 미쳤을 뿐만 아니라 연구자 간 중재자 역할을 충실히 수행하였다. 또한 한국 지적학 공동 저술 네트워크의 영향력 있는 연구자들은 특정 지역에 집중되어 있었다. 게다가, 연구자들 사이의 거리는 제한된 범위에서 공동 저작 결정에 영향을 미쳤다. 본 연구는 공간 분석 기법을 사용하여 공동 저작 활동의 공간 분포 패턴을 식별했다는 점에서 기존의 연구들과 큰 차이가 있다. 그러나 본 연구는 공동 저작 활동의 공간 분포 패턴을 식별하기 위해 2019년도 데이터만을 사용했다는 점에서 한계를 지니고 있다. 이러한 한계들은 우리가 향후 연구에서 복수 년도 자료를 이용하여 공동 저작 활동의 공간 분포 패턴을 분석한다면 극복할 수 있을 것이다.

• 사물인터넷융복합논문지
• /
• 제7권2호
• /
• pp.7-12
• /
• 2021

지혜콘텐츠는 여러 사람들의 경험과 아이디어로 창작되고 지역 제한이 없는 인터넷 기반 소셜 플랫폼에서 소비된다. 기존의 저작권 등록 시스템은 전문 제작자를 대상으로 하고 있으며 그 효력은 해당 국가에 종속된다. 블록체인은 서비스에 종속적이고 P2P 네트워크를 구성하는 노드들의 합의에 의해서 수정 및 삭제할 수 없는 데이터가 저장된다. 본 논문에서는 소셜 플랫폼에서 사용되는 지혜콘텐츠의 공동저작권 보호에 적합한 블록체인 기반의 부인봉쇄 다중서명 기법을 제안한다. 제안한 기법은 공동저작자들의 공통키 생성, 다중서명 생성 및 검증 프로토콜로 구성된다. 부인봉쇄 서명은 서명자의 도움 없이는 서명을 검증할 수 없는 기법이다. 제안한 기법은 콘텐츠 구매 프로토콜에 적용되어 자동화된 수익분배를 가능하게 한다. 블록체인 기반 다중서명 검증을 통해서 모든 공동저작자들은 수익분배의 공정성을 부인할 수 없다.

• International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.17-34
• /
• 2022

This informetrics study was conducted to find out the distribution of articles and authors that published in African Journal of Library, Archives and Information Studies [AJLAIS]) from 2009 to 2018; considering the year-wise growth of research articles; authorship pattern and collaboration ratio; subject and geographical distributions of authors; and authors' productivity level. A descriptive informetrics research design was adopted. Quota sampling technique was used to select all the articles published within the ten-year period. Data collected through a self-designed checklist was analyzed using frequency count and percentage. The findings revealed that 141 articles, contributed by 266 authors were published by AJLAIS during the period. An annual average growth of 1.20% was recorded. Overall year-wise authorship pattern revealed that majority of articles (62.41%) published in AJLAIS were multiple authored. Also, articles on Informetrics and ICT dominated the journal. Some subject areas not covered were identified such as: indexing and serial collections management. Average collaborative index across the 10-year period for the journal was 0.62. South Africa and Nigeria were the two major prolific contributors to AJLAIS, just as evidence-based research papers of survey type (65.25%) were the most common to the journal. There should be increased numbers of articles in each edition over the coming years, and awareness should be created by the publishers to familiarize the researchers with the publishing requirements of the journal. Also, LIS researchers should concentrate more on areas usually left untouched by previous studies. The study is original as no other similar study was found on publication pattern of articles in AJLAIS covering a ten year period of 2009-2018. The findings of the study will also serve as a feedback mechanism for the Publisher of the Journal and LIS researchers on how to improve the journal and LIS research in general.

• 연구윤리
• /
• 제1권2호
• /
• pp.1-5
• /
• 2020

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify the most common misconducts in publication ethics, to demonstrate KODISA journals' management of the misconducts, and to share the findings with future and potential authors of Journal of Research and Publication Ethics (JRPE). Research design, data and methodology: This is an analytical study that explores and examines research and publication ethics and misconducts. Results: Based on literature review, major publication misconducts that many academic journals had to contend with over the years encompass unethical authorship, including ghost, guest, and gift authorships, data falsification and fabrication, plagiarism, including self-plagiarism, submission and publication fraud (multiple submission and publication), and potential conflicts of interest. Conclusions: KODISA and its journals have strived and done great work in making the journals transparent and in combatting the issues associated with plagiarism, including self-plagiarism. However, it seems there is no mechanism to detect or deter unethical authorship, conflicts of interest, and fabrication and falsification misconducts. The inception of JRPE signifies how KODISA and its journals continuously view research and publication ethics as their foremost important factor in maintaining and improving the academic journals. The future research and scholastic manuscripts of JRPE could provide necessary and updated information about research and publication ethics, practices, and misconducts.

• Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice
• /
• 제5권2호
• /
• pp.62-74
• /
• 2017

This study examined the mechanical engineering research output from India, Japan, and South Korea on different parameters including growth, collaboration indices, and activity index. The purpose of the study is to understand the overall development of mechanical engineering through analytical approaches applied on the scholarly outcome of the countries considered for the study. The study focuses on analysing the articles published by India, Japan, and South Korea, and is restricted to articles indexed in the Science Citation Index - Web of Science for the period 2000 to 2014. The ratios of number of paper to citations for India, Japan, and Korea are 20,836: 1,97,679; 24,494: 2,04,393; and 30,578: 2,66,902 respectively for the period 2000-2014. The findings show that there is a decline in Japanese publications in mechanical engineering, whereas other two countries have recorded an increasing trend. While India has tripled its publications in a span of 15 years, South Korea, on the other hand, has doubled its publications in the same span of time. There has been an increasing trend towards collaboration in almost all fields of science and technology. However, the extent of collaboration and their rate of growth varied for one subject to another, one branch to another branch of the same subject, and from one country to another country. The present study analyses the growth of research publications of the mechanical engineering domain including authorship distribution, collaboration indices, prominent journals, and activity index.

• 대한한의학방제학회지
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.57-77
• /
• 2010

Objective : This study reviews the recent trend of oriental medical prescription research. The data examined are the articles published in the Korean Journal of Oriental Medical Prescription from 1990 to 2009. Method : The data are retrieved through the internet database Oriental Medicine Advanced Searching Integrated System (OASIS) and the collection of the Korean Journal of Oriental Medical Prescription. The number of articles examined is 385, published in 25 volumes of the journal. This study examines the nature of the articles, research methods, subjects, and author information. Research subjects are sorted out by the OASIS key words for the articles published before 1999, and by key word indexes cited in the abstracts for the articles published sinceafter. Results : Among the 385 articles collected, 206 are research articles, 143 philological articles, 35 case studies, and 1 special contribution. A majority of research articles are experimental studies (199 articles or 96.6%), while clinical reports (5 articles or 2.43%), and others studies (2 articles) occupy a small portion. Most of experimental studies (183 articles or 91%) examine the effectiveness of certain prescriptions or treatments. Among the effectiveness studies, 114 articles (62.3%) employ in vivo experiment design, 52 articles (28.42%) in vitro experiments, and 17 articles (9.29%) both in vivo and in vitro experiments. In terms of research subject, the most frequently indexed key words are hepatotoxicity among diseases (9 articles), Bojungikgitang (Bu-Zhong-Yi-Qi-Tang) among prescriptions (10 articles), Buja (Acontii Tuber) among meteria medica (4 articles), immunity and anti-oxidation among efficacy terminology (6 articles each), and Donguibogam(東醫寶鑑) among references in the key words (25 articles). Universities are the main affiliation of authors (76.42%), followed by university hospitals (6.71%), non-academic research institutes (5.55%), local clinics (4.67), academic research institutes (2.81%), hospitals (2.38%), and others (1.44%). The most affiliated institute of the first and correspondent authors is Wonkwang University. In terms of authorship, co-authorship outnumbers sole-authorship by 82.08% to 17.92%. The proportion of authors of a single article is 63.54% which is near the author productivity distribution described by Lotka's law.