• Title/Summary/Keyword: Aspherics

Search Result 12, Processing Time 0.016 seconds

Free-Form Surface Reconstruction Method from Second-Derivative Data (형상이차미분을 이용한 자유곡면 형상복원법)

  • Kim, Byoung Chang;Kim, DaeWook;Kim, GeonHee
    • Korean Journal of Optics and Photonics
    • /
    • v.25 no.5
    • /
    • pp.273-278
    • /
    • 2014
  • We present an algorithm for surface reconstruction from the second-derivative data for free-form aspherics, which uses a subaperture scanning system that measures the local surface profile and determines the three second-derivative values at those local sampling points across the free-form surface. The three second-derivative data were integrated to get a map of x- and y-slopes, which went through a second Southwell integration step to reconstruct the surface profile. A synthetic free-form surface 200 mm in diameter was simulated. The simulation results show that the reconstruction error is 19 nm RMS residual difference. Finally, the sensitivity to noise is diagnosed for second-derivative Gaussian random noise with a signal to noise ratio (SNR) of 16, the simulation results proving that the suggested method is robust to noise.

Surface-error Measurement for a Convex Aspheric Mirror Using a Double-stitching Method (이중 정합법을 이용한 볼록비구면 반사경의 형상 오차 측정)

  • Kim, Goeun;Lee, Yun-Woo;Yang, Ho-Soon
    • Korean Journal of Optics and Photonics
    • /
    • v.32 no.6
    • /
    • pp.314-322
    • /
    • 2021
  • A reflecting telescope consists of a concave primary mirror and a convex secondary mirror. The primary mirror is easy to measure, because it converges the beam from an interferometer, while the secondary mirror diverges the beam and so is not easy to measure, even though it is smaller than the primary mirror. In addition, the Korsch-type telescope uses the central area of the secondary mirror, so that the entire area of the secondary mirror needs to be measured, which the classical Hindle test cannot do. In this paper, we propose a double-stitching method that combines two separate area measurements: the annular area, measured using the Hindle stitching method, and the central area, measured using a spherical wave from the interferometer. We test the surface error of a convex asphere that is 202 mm in diameter, with 499 mm for its radius of curvature and -4.613 for its conic constant. The surface error is calculated to be 19.5±1.3 nm rms, which is only 0.7 nm rms different from the commercial stitching interferometer, ASI. Also, the two results show a similar 45° astigmatism aberration. Therefore, our proposed method is found to be valuable for testing the whole area of a convex asphere.