• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제16권15호
• /
• pp.6359-6364
• /
• 2015

Background: Preclinical studies have shown that the combination of an aromatase inhibitor (AI) and capecitabine in estrogen receptor (ER)- positive cell lines enhance antitumor efficacy. This retrospective analysis of a group of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) evaluated the efficacy and safety of combined AI with capecitabine. Materials and Methods: Patients with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer treated between 1st January 2005 and 31st December 2010 with a combination of capecitabine and AI were evaluated and outcomes were compared with those of women treated with capecitabine in conventional dose or AI as a monotherapy. Results: Of 72 patients evaluated, 31 received the combination treatment, 22 AI and 19 capecitabine. The combination was used in 20 patients as first-line and 11 as second-line treatment. Mean age was 46.2 years with a range of 28-72 years. At the time of progression, 97% had a performance status of <2 and 55% had visceral disease. No significant difference was observed between the three groups according to clinical and pathological features. Mean follow up was 38 months with a range of 16-66 months. The median PFS of first-line treatment was significantly better for the combination (PFS 21 months vs 8.0 months for capecitabine and 15.0 months for AI). For second-line treatment, the PFS was longer in the combination compared with capecitabine and Al groups (18 months vs. 5.0 months vs. 11.0 months, respectively). Median 2 year and 5 year survival did not show any significant differences among combination and monotherapy groups. The most common adverse events for the combination group were grade 1 and 2 hand-for syndrome (69%), grade 1 fatigue (64%) and grade 1 diarrhoea (29%). Three grade 3 hand-foot syndrome events were reported. Conclusions: Combination treatment with capecitabine and AI used as a first line or second line treatment was safe with much lowered toxicity. Prospective randomized clinical trials should evaluate the use of combination therapy in advanced breast cancer to confirm these findings.

• Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine
• /
• 제41권3호
• /
• pp.108-114
• /
• 2014

Male factors account for 20%-50% of cases of infertility and in 25% of cases, the etiology of male infertility is unknown. Effective treatments are well-established for hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, male accessory gland infection, retrograde ejaculation, and positive antisperm antibody. However, the appropriate treatment for idiopathic male infertility is unclear. Empirical medical treatment (EMT) has been used in men with idiopathic infertility and can be divided into two categories based on the mode of action: hormonal treatment and antioxidant supplementation. Hormonal medications consist of gonadotropins, androgens, estrogen receptor blockers, and aromatase inhibitors. Antioxidants such as vitamins, zinc, and carnitines have also been widely used to reduce oxidative stress-induced spermatozoa damage. Although scientifically acceptable evidence of EMT is limited because of the lack of large, randomized, controlled studies, recent systematic reviews with meta-analyses have shown that the administration of gonadotropins, anti-estrogens, and oral antioxidants results in a significant increase in the live birth rate compared with control treatments. Therefore, all physicians who treat infertility should bear in mind that EMT can improve semen parameters and subsequent fertility potential through natural intercourse.

• Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine
• /
• 제48권1호
• /
• pp.1-10
• /
• 2021

In Korean women, a westernized lifestyle is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. Fertility preservation has become an increasingly important issue for women with breast cancer, in accordance with substantial improvements in survival rate after cancer treatment. The methods of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for fertility preservation in breast cancer patients have been modified to include aromatase inhibitors to reduce the potential harm associated with increased estradiol levels. Random-start COH and dual ovarian stimulation are feasible options to reduce the total duration of fertility preservation treatment and to efficiently collect oocytes or embryos. Using a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist as a trigger may improve cycle outcomes in breast cancer patients undergoing COH for fertility preservation. In young breast cancer patients with BRCA mutations, especially BRCA1 mutations, the possibility of diminished ovarian reserve may be considered, although further studies are necessary. Herein, we review the current literature on the practical issues surrounding COH for fertility preservation in women with breast cancer.

• 생명과학회지
• /
• 제28권2호
• /
• pp.265-273
• /
• 2018

에스트로겐(E2)은 유방암의 발달과 진행에 관여하며, 에스트로겐 수용체(ER)에 의해 매개된다. ER은 유방암세포에서 epidermal growth factor receptor와 insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor의 신호전달경로들 사이에서 다양한 cross-talk을 통하여 세포의 증식, 이주, 침습 및 약물에 대한 저항성을 일으키는데 중요한 역할을 수행한다. 유방암은 내분비신호전달의 항상성 붕괴에 의해 주로 발생되며, 특히 E2/IGF-1/EGF와 ER/G-protein estrogen receptor (GPER)/IGF-1R/EGFR, 그리고 이들의 세포내 신호전달 매개인자들의 통제되지 않는 발현과 활성증가에 의해 유발된다. 이러한 변화는 E2와 성장인자 신호전달 사이의 복잡한 cross-talk에 영향을 주어 결국 암의 진행과 내분비조절인자들에 대한 저항성을 갖게 된다. 따라서, E2와 성장인자들 사이의 cross-talk에 관한 분자적 기전을 단계별로 규명하는 것은 유방암의 다양한 유형에 따른 맞춤형 치료에 기여할 것으로 사료된다. 특히, 다양한 유전형 및 표현형을 가진 유방암의 치료를 위한 전략으로서, ER+ 호르몬의존성 유방암세포에 대한 aromatase 억제제 및 E2작용 차단제의 사용과 E2와 성장인자들 사이의 cross-talk에 의한 암세포의 증식억제를 위한 IGF-1R/EGFR 활성차단제의 사용 등을 들 수 있다. 뿐만 아니라, ER과 EGFR/IGF-1R 사이의 cross-talk에 의해 조절되는 ECM 분자들의 발현변화는 유방암세포의 전이에 대한 표적치료제를 위해 활용될 수 있다. 따라서, 암의 진행과 관련된 ER, GPER, IGF-1R 및 EGFR 매개에 의한 신호전달경로들 사이의 cross-talk에 관한 보다 더 자세한 분자적 수준의 규명이 필요할 것으로 사료된다.