• 제목/요약/키워드: Arbitration Act (AA)

검색결과 2건 처리시간 0.014초

Arbitration in Singapore

  • Mardiani, Henny
    • 한국중재학회지:중재연구
    • /
    • 제16권3호
    • /
    • pp.217-230
    • /
    • 2006
  • Singapore is a dual-track arbitration regime. Where seat of arbitration is Singapore, the governing procedural law for domestic arbitration is AA and for international arbitration is IAA. The parties may by agreement opt-out of and opt-into a specific regime. SIAC is a leading arbitral institution in Singapore. It offers wide range of services: administer arbitration proceedings, arrangement of logistics for arbitration hearing, appointment of arbitral tribunal for ad hoc arbitration in Singapore as well as registry and authentication of arbitral awards.

  • PDF

국제상사중재에서 중재합의의 준거법 결정기준 - 영국 대법원의 2021년 Kabab-Ji SAL v Kout Food Group 판결을 중심으로 - (The Governing Law of Arbitration Agreements Issues in International Commercial Arbitration : A Case Comment on Kabab-Ji Sal (Lebanon) v Kout Food Group (Kuwait) [2021] UKSC 48)

  • 김영주
    • 한국중재학회지:중재연구
    • /
    • 제32권2호
    • /
    • pp.3-30
    • /
    • 2022
  • On 27 October the Supreme Court of UK handed down its much anticipated decision in Kabab-Ji SAL (Lebanon) v Kout Food Group (Kuwait) [2021] UKSC 48. The issues for the Supreme Court to decide were as follows: (1) which law governed the validity of the arbitration agreement; (2) if English law applied, whether, as a matter of English law, there was any real prospect that a court might find that KFG became a party to the arbitration agreement, and (3) whether, procedurally, the Court of Appeal was correct in giving summary judgment refusing recognition and enforcement the award, or whether there should have been a full rehearing of whether there was a valid and binding arbitration agreement for the purposes of the New York Convention and the AA 1996 (the 'procedural' issue) The decision in Kabab-Ji provides further reassuring clarity on how the governing law of the arbitration agreement is to be determined under English law where the governing law is not expressly stated in the arbitration agreement itself. The Supreme Court's reasoning is consistent with its earlier decision on the same issue, albeit in the context of enforcement pursuant to the New York Convention, rather than considering the arbitration agreement before an award is rendered. This paper presents some implications of Kabab-Ji case. Also, it seeks to provide a meaningful discussion and theories on the arbitration system in Korea.