• Title/Summary/Keyword: Appendage modeling

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.02 seconds

A Research on the Mathematical Modeling for the Estimation of Underwater Vehicle's Tail Plane Efficiency (수중함의 함미타 효율추정을 위한 수학모델링에 관한 연구)

  • Shin, Yong-Ku;Lim, Kyung-Sik;Lee, Seung-Keon
    • Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea
    • /
    • v.42 no.3
    • /
    • pp.190-196
    • /
    • 2005
  • The ratio between the hydrodynamic force produced by a submarine tau appendage and that acting on an equivalent appendage in isolation is regarded as tail plane efficiency. It is an important parameter in numerical simulations because it has a significant effect on predicted stability, controllability, and maneuverability. The paper introduces some recent work to improve the reliability and general applicability of current methods of tail plane efficiency estimation.

Assessment of the Resistance Performance of Hull Appendages Attached to Fishing Vessels Using CFD (CFD에 의한 어선 선체 부가물의 저항성능 평가)

  • Park, Dong-Woo
    • Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety
    • /
    • v.24 no.2
    • /
    • pp.267-274
    • /
    • 2018
  • A variety of appendages are attached to coastal and offshore fishing boats to improve stability during navigation or fishing operations (stability performance and roll reduction). These appendages are generally classified into three types, which are shown in Fig. 1. The numerical calculations were conducted for the following eight cases: one case of a bare hull, three cases where a single appendage attached, three cases of a pair of appendages attached, and one case where all three appendages were attached. Table 1 presents the main dimensions of the bare hull and Table 2 describes the main dimensions of the three appendages. The fluid dynamic performance with regard to the three hull appendages was evaluated via CFD for the following cases: each of the appendages attached independently, a pair of appendages attached, and all three appendages attached simultaneously. The No. 1 appendage showed that pressure resistance was proportionally greater than friction resistances. Both Nos. 2 and 3 appendages showed comparable levels of pressure and friction resistances. The correlation between appendages was minimal in the case of pairs and Comparing the cases of the No. 2 appendage attached and all appendages attached, at 11 kn, the EHP showed an difference of 9 %.