• Title/Summary/Keyword: Apatinib

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.016 seconds

Apatinib as a Third-Line Treatment for HER2-Positive Metastatic Gastric Cancer: A Multi-Center Single-Arm Cohort Study

  • Zhang, Xin;Huo, Haoran;Nie, Yanan;Xue, Jiadong;Yuan, Zengjiang;Zhang, Zhenyi
    • Journal of Gastric Cancer
    • /
    • v.22 no.4
    • /
    • pp.408-417
    • /
    • 2022
  • Purpose: Treatment options are limited after the failure of first-and second-line treatments in patients with HER2+ metastatic gastric cancer (mGC). The present study aimed to explore the efficacy, safety, and prognostic factors of apatinib efficacy as a third-line therapy for patients with human epithelial growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) mGC. Materials and Methods: A total of 59 HER2+ mGC patients who received apatinib as third-line therapy were retrospectively enrolled in this two-center, single-arm, cohort study; the clinical response, survival data, and adverse events were retrieved. Results: The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.9-6.5), and the median overall survival (OS) was 8.2 months (95% CI, 6.6-9.8) Furthermore, forward stepwise multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that a higher Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score and multiple metastases were independently correlated with decreased PFS and OS (both P<0.05). The main adverse events were leukopenia (45.8%), hypertension (44.1%), thrombocytopenia (39.0%), hand-foot syndrome (37.3%), and elevated transaminase (33.9%). Grade 3 adverse events mainly included hypertension (5.1%) and neutropenia (5.1%); grade 4 adverse events did not occur. Conclusions: Apatinib is efficient and well tolerated in patients with HER2+ mGC as a third-line treatment, suggesting that it may be a candidate of choice for these patients.

Current and New Molecularly Targeted Agents for Metastatic Gastric Cancer

  • Sung Chul Park
    • Journal of Digestive Cancer Research
    • /
    • v.3 no.1
    • /
    • pp.11-16
    • /
    • 2015
  • The discovery of HER2, a biomarker in advanced gastric cancer, and successful clinical trial using trastuzumab that targets this biomarker signaled a revolutionary turning point in treatment of metastatic gastric cancer. Many studies about targeted agents for gastric cancer have been attempted. Among them, ramicirumab, a monoclonal antibody that targets vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2), and apatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that targets VEGFR2, have shown to improve the survival rates in advanced gastric cancer patients, for whom previous therapies had failed; hence, they are expected to be accepted as one of the standard therapies for advanced gastric cancer.

  • PDF

Neoadjuvant PD-1 Inhibitor Plus Apatinib and Chemotherapy Versus Apatinib Plus Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Prospective, Cohort Study

  • Chunjing Wang;Zhen Wang;Yue Zhao;Fujing Wang
    • Journal of Gastric Cancer
    • /
    • v.23 no.2
    • /
    • pp.328-339
    • /
    • 2023
  • Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors plus apatinib and chemotherapy (PAC) in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). Materials and Methods: Seventy-three patients with resectable LAGC were enrolled and named the PAC group (n=39) or apatinib plus chemotherapy (AC) group (n=34) based on the treatment they chose. Neoadjuvant therapy was administered in a 21-day cycle for 3 consecutive cycles, after which surgery was performed. Results: The PAC group exhibited a higher objective response rate than the AC group (74.4% vs. 58.8%, P=0.159). Moreover, the PAC group showed a numerically better response profile than the AC group (P=0.081). Strikingly, progression-free survival (PFS) (P=0.019) and overall survival (OS) (P=0.049) were prolonged, whereas disease-free survival (DFS) tended to be longer in the PAC group than in the AC group (P=0.056). Briefly, the 3-year PFS, DFS, and OS rates were 76.1%, 76.1%, and 86.7% in the PAC group and 46.9%, 49.9%, and 70.3% in the AC group, respectively. Furthermore, PAC (vs. AC) treatment (hazard ratio=0.286, P=0.034) was independently associated with prolonged PFS in multivariate Cox regression analyses. The incidence of adverse events did not differ between the two groups (all P>0.05), where leukopenia, anemia, hypertension, and other adverse events were commonly observed in the PAC group. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant PAC therapy may achieve a preferable pathological response, delayed progression, and prolonged survival compared to AC therapy with a similar safety profile in patients with LAGC; however, further validation is warranted.