• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제42권2호
• /
• pp.151-170
• /
• 2011

이 연구에서는 분석합성식 문헌분류이론이 실생활에 적용되어 활용되고 있는 사례들을 찾아 이를 새로운 시각에서 분석하고자 시도하였다. 이를 위해 우리가 일상적으로 사용하는 한글의 초성과 중성, 종성의 합성 사례와 함께, 대구광역시 및 서울특별시의 시내버스번호, 주요 결혼관련업체의 회원정보, 부동산중개 및 경매관련정보, 우편번호와 광역전화통화권역(DDD) 번호 등의 사례를 문헌분류의 시각에서 분석해보고 그것이 주는 시사점을 제시하였다. 분석합성식 분류이론과 그 기법을 적용할 경우 특히 각 시스템의 기호법의 개선에 도움이 될 수 있음을 밝히고 있다.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제34권1호
• /
• pp.217-237
• /
• 2003

이 연구에서는 Shakespeare에 관련된 문헌의 분류에 있어서의 실태와 문제점을 살펴보고, 해당주제의 확장전개를 위해 DDC, LCC, CC 등의 주요분류표와 관련분야의 전개표 등을 참고하여, 새로운 분석합성 식 분류시스템을 제안하였다. 새로운 전개방식은 기본적으로 Shakespeare라는 주제아래에서 4개의 패싯을 “일반적 특성(generalities) + 문학형식(form) + 개별작품(works) + 언어(language)”순으로 전개하도록 하고, 각 패싯에 대해 별도의 구체적인 배열구조(away)를 제시하였다.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제32권2호
• /
• pp.55-76
• /
• 1998

이 논문의 전반부는 분석적 합성식 분류법의 일반적인 특성과 장단점을 열거식분류법과 대비하여 분석하고 있다. 후반부에서는 분석적 합성식 분류표의 일반적인 작성단계와 그에 따르는 문제점과 고려사항을 분석하고, 이를 결혼상담소용 분류표의 작성이라는 실예를 통하여, 패싯분석과 주류의 순서 및 열거순서, 배열구조상의 순서 등 각종 순서의 결정, 분류기호의 선택과 적용의 순서로 고찰하고 있다.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제21권
• /
• pp.195-229
• /
• 1994

This article investigates the normative principles suggested by Rangannathan as the guiding principles for his theories, consisting of basic laws, fundamental laws, canons, principles and postulates. His five basic laws and five laws of library science are re-interpreted from the view point of library classification. And three planes of idea plane, verbal plane and notational plane, one of the core ideas in his analytico-synthetic theory of library classification, are analyzed. This article also suggests the demonstration model for this three planes using the ideas from chemistry ad chemical equation. In the last part, it analyzes the canons for library classification of three planes. These normative principles are basically guiding principles for so-called analytico-synthetic or faceted classification. But they can be a n.0, pplied to most of modern classification. But they can be a n.0, pplied to most of modern classification schemes, especially to semi-enumerative schemes including DDC, KDC, etc. so that they can improve the schemes. From this regard, these principles can also be helpful to the KDC, on the verge of the revision of its fourth edition.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제24권
• /
• pp.449-484
• /
• 1996

The purpose of this study is to analyze the structural model of classification, to compare enumerative schemes with faceted schemes and finding the facted schems used in the Dewey Decimal Classification. The Structural model of classifications can be divided to enumerrative schemes and facted schemes(analytico-synthetic schemes). Enumerative schemes represent the various kind of subject in different ways and have to not only list all existing combinations of subjects but also any of potential subjects. Faceted schemes is the decomposition of concepts into all possible characteristics which are known as facets. DDC was originally created as enumerative, but over 20 editions has moved increasing towards synthetic features such as the add instructions, and the seven auxiliary tables. Many DDC class numbers found in the Schedules may be subdivied by another number(or part of it) that has been drawn from the Schedules or auxiliary tables. This process of subdividing class numbers is called number building and it can be done only when there are number building instruction in the Schedules or Tables.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제39권3호
• /
• pp.299-320
• /
• 2008

이 연구는 MRF(Master Reference File)를 바탕으로 2005년에 영국의 BSI(British Standards Institution) 에서 인쇄 형태로 출판한 UDC(Universal Decimal Classification)의 표준판(Standard edition)을 대상으로 그 성립배경과 구조적 특성을 분석하고, 한국어 간략판과 비교하였다. UDC는 다른 십진식분류표에 대비하여 독특한 구조적 특성이 있으며, 한국어 간략판과 비교하여 볼 때 국제적 보편성을 더욱 강화하였고, 보조표를 통한 조합의 방식이 더욱 확대되었다. 이 연구를 바탕으로 앞으로의 KDC(Korean Decimal Classification)의 개정에 있어서 참고가 될 만한 KDC MRF 데이터베이스 개발과 보조표의 개선과 새로운 신설을 제언하였다.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제45권4호
• /
• pp.309-326
• /
• 2011

There have been several milestones in the history of library classification but most of the schemes failed to meet the new challenges in the organisation of information. Dr. S. R. Ranganathan tried to revolutionise the whole thinking on classificatory approach, when he devised the Colon Classification (CC) in 1933. He developed the Colon Classification scheme with a sound theoretical background based on normative principles, Five laws of Library science, canons, etc. One important feature of CC is that, its use is not confined to information storage and retrieval alone. This paper presents an over view of different editions of the CC highlighting the salient features of the editions. Further the implication of Five Laws of Library Science has been described. The authors stressed that the features of such as greater hospitality, specificity and mixed notation has paved the way to design and develop the depth schedules on various micro level subjects and so far about 130 micro schedules have been published. The impressions by the leading LIS professionals during and after Ranganathan's time have been highlighted. The authors expressed the fear that when the library world would see the complete version of the seventh edition of CC? It may be due to lack of institutional support engaging in the research or financial constraints. The authors are of the opinion that any scheme to flourish needs a sound research body to bring out the revised editions as done in the case of Dewey Decimal Classification. The relevance of the CC in the contemporary world of Librarianship is discussed. Finally concludes that CC needs to be resuscitated as it is a precious national heritage; and still a force for the management of libraries.

• 정보관리학회지
• /
• 제4권2호
• /
• pp.47-61
• /
• 1987

하나의 주제가 분류표 상에서 둘 이상의 기본주제로 구성된 경우를 콜론분류법에서는 복합주제라고 하고, 이 복합주제를 구성하고 있는 각 주제 간의 관계를 불완전한 결합이라고 한다. 상이한 두 주제가 이와 같은 결합을 구성할 때 개개의 구성요소를 상이라고 하고 주제의 패싯 관계와 구분하고 있으며 3가지 수준에서 각각 6가지 종류로 규정하고 있다. DDC 나 UDC 등에서도 부분적으로는 이러한 상 관계가 도입되고 있으나, 그 관계나 수준에 대한 규정이 마련되어 있지 않으며 더우기 이들 관계의 표현방법이 제시되어 있지 않고 있다. 전통적인 체계분류법에서도 복합주제의 처리에 있어, 상 관계의 설정 및 주제구성을 위한 구체적인 방법이 더욱 확대, 도입되어야 할 것이다.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제20권
• /
• pp.351-381
• /
• 1993

The purpose of this study is to analyze the various processes and patterns to build or synthesize class numbers in the 800 class of the Dewey Decimal Classification, Edition 20(1989). The results of the analysis are as follows: 1. The 800(Literature and rhetoric) class in the DDC system is the main class added analytico-synthetic principle positively to an enumerative scheme. 2. The facets to be a n.0, pplied in literature are language literary form literary period ; kind, scope, or medium ; notation 08(collection) or 09(criticism) literary feature, subject, author, etc. 3. In the 800 class, there are the five tables of precedence for literary forms aspects ; specific kinds of persons ; literary, period in relation to the aspects for works treating more than one literary form subforms, aspects and literary periods in the works treating a specific literary form. 4. The basic number synthesis of literary works proceeds through the various facets in the following sequence, as far as necessary for the item : base no. + literary form + literary time or period + kind, scope, or medium + notation 08 or 09 + subform + additional notation from T3C and other tables. 5. In view of the multiplicity of facets, their synthesis formulas take the following order : (1) Works about the literature : base no.(schedule) + language(T6) or form(T3B) (2) Works by or about individual author : base no.(schedule) + form (T3A) + period(schedule) + subform(T3A) (3) Works by or about more than one author, not restricted by language facet : base no.(schedule) + period(T1) ; base no.(schedule) + kind, scope, medium(T3B), or feature(T3C), or person(T5). (4) Works by or about more than one author, restricted by language facet : base no.(schedule) + form (T3B) + period(schedule) + subform(T3B) + notation 08 or 09(T3B) ; base no.(schedule) + notation 08 or 09(T3B) + 9(T3C) + area notation(T2) : base no.(schedule) + form (T3B) + notation 008 or 009(T3B) : base no.(schedule) + form (T3B) + kind, scope, medium(T3B) + notation 08 or 09(T3B) + period(schedule). (5) Affiliated literatures for which period numbers are not us base no.(schedule) + form (T3A or T3B), or notation 08 or 09(T3B) : base no.(schedule) + kind, scope, medium(T3B), feature(T3C), or person(T5) 6. The problems in the number building of the 800 class are the complexity and difficulty of number synthesis, the intrinsic weakness of from distinction and the inconvenience of retrieval inherent in the form class. In order to solve these problems, therefore, the citation orders and methods of DDC should be improved and synthesis patterns simplified from the point of view of its applicability and its usefulness in the "literature class".