• 제목/요약/키워드: Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions(ACSCs)

검색결과 3건 처리시간 0.022초

외래의료 민감 질환으로 응급실을 내원한 환자의 특성 분석: 의료전달체계 중심으로 (Analysis of the Characteristics of Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions in Patients Visiting the Emergency Departments: Focused on Health-care Delivery System)

  • 허영진;김지연;이명화;이성민;오미라
    • 융합정보논문지
    • /
    • 제10권10호
    • /
    • pp.253-258
    • /
    • 2020
  • 본 연구는 외래의료 민감 질환(Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions, ACSCs)으로 응급실에 내원한 환자들의 특성을 연령(성인 19-64세, 노인 65세 이상)으로 구분하여 그 차이를 비교 분석하였다. 2018년 1월 1일부터 12월 31일까지의 국가응급진료정보망 자료를 이용하여 응급의료기관 종별과 ACSCs의 비율, 응급실 재실시간, 입원일수, 입원율을 살펴보았다. 응급의료기관 종별에서는 지역응급의료센터의 비율이 높았고(P<0.001), ACSCs의 질환 비율에서 성인은 위장염 31.7%와 노인은 폐렴 48.2%로 높게 나타났다(P<0.001). 응급실 재실시간은 울혈성심부전과 당뇨를 제외한 모든 질환에서 노인이 길게 나타났고(P<0.001), 입원일수는 ACSCs 모든 질환에서 노인이 유의하게 길게 나타났으며(P<0.05), 입원율은 당뇨를 제외한 모든 질환에서 노인의 비율이 유의하게 높았다(P<0.01). 이와 같이 ACSCs로 인한 응급실 이용을 파악하여 외래 중심으로 치료를 유도할 수 있도록 의료정책을 강화해야 할 것이다.

외래진료 민감질환 유질환자 중 장애인과 비장애인의 의료이용률 차이 (Differences in Medical Care Utilization Rates of the Disabled and the Non-disabled with Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions)

  • 은상준;홍지영;이진용;이진석;김용익;신영수;김윤
    • Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
    • /
    • 제39권5호
    • /
    • pp.411-418
    • /
    • 2006
  • Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the disabled have worse access to primary care than the non-disabled. Methods: We used the National Disability Registry data and the National Health Insurance data for the calendar year 2003, and we analyzed 807,380 disabled persons who had been registered until December 2001 and we also analyzed 1,614,760 non-disabled persons for nine ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs). The rates of physician visits and hospitalizations for the patients with ACSCs were compared between the disabled and the nondisabled. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between medical care utilization and disability and to assess the association between hospitalization and the number of physician visits while controlling for potential confounders. Results: The numbers of physician visits per 100 patients were $0.78{\sim}0.97$ times lower for the disabled than that for the non-disabled with five of nine ACSCs. The numbers of hospitalizations per 100 patients were $1.16{\sim}1.77$ times higher for the disabled than that for the non-disabled with all the ACSCs. While the ORs of a physician visit for the disabled were significantly lower than that for the non-disabled with all the ACSCs (OR: $0.44{\sim}0.70$), and the ORs of hospitalization for the disabled were significantly higher (OR: $1.16{\sim}1.89$). The lower physician visit group (number of physician visits ${\leq}$1) was more likely to be hospitalized than the higher physician visit group (number of physician visits ${\geq}$2) (OR: $1.69{\sim}19.77$). The effect of the physician visit rate on hospitalization was larger than the effect of disability on hospitalization. Conclusions: The results suggest that the disabled were more likely to be hospitalized for ACSCs due to their lower access to primary care.

한국의 의료기관 외래진료 민감질환 입원율: 의료이용 효율성 지표로의 활용 가능성? (Hospital Admission Rates for Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions in South Korea: Could It Be Used as an Indicator for Measuring Efficiency of Healthcare Utilization?)

  • 정건작;김진경;강혜영;신의철
    • 보건행정학회지
    • /
    • 제26권1호
    • /
    • pp.4-11
    • /
    • 2016
  • Background: Hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs), which are widely used as an indicator of poor access to primary care, can be used as an efficiency indicator of healthcare use in countries providing good access to health care. Korea, which has a national health insurance (NHI) system and a good supply of health care resources, is one such country. To quantify admission rates of ACSC and identify characteristics influencing variation in Korean health care institutions. Methods: By using NHI claims data, we computed the mean ACSC admission rate for all institutions with ACSC admissions. Results: The average ACSC admission rate for 4,461 institutions was 1.45%. Hospitals and clinics with inpatient beds showed larger variations in the ACSC admission rate (0%-87.9% and 0%-99.6%, respectively) and a higher coefficient of variation (7.96 and 2.29) than general/tertiary care hospitals (0%-19.1%, 0.85). The regression analysis results indicate that the ACSC admission rate was significantly higher for hospitals than for clinics (${\beta}=0.986$, p<0.05), and for private corporate institutions than public institutions (${\beta}=0.271$, p<0.05). Conclusion: Substantial variations in ACSC admission rates could suggest the potential problem of inefficient use of healthcare resources. Since hospitals and private corporate institutions tend to increase ACSC admission rates, future health policy should focus on these types of institutions.