• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제11권
• /
• pp.301-320
• /
• 1999

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제10권
• /
• pp.263-289
• /
• 1998

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.189-206
• /
• 2008

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제12권
• /
• pp.368-385
• /
• 2000

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제6권
• /
• pp.149-164
• /
• 1994

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제13권
• /
• pp.325-340
• /
• 2001

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제18권
• /
• pp.65-75
• /
• 2003

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.135-154
• /
• 2007

The 3 Northeast Asian countries of Korea, Japan and China have been stricter to each other than to other countries of out-region in air liberalization. The prominent reason of this intra-regional protective policy in air transportation seems to be the difference in competitive strength of their national flag carriers. As the 3 countries realize the importance of their mutual cooperation in the region, since China grows to be one of the leading economies in the world and the intra-regional trade and visitors increase tremendously, they are now taking the policy of intra-regional air liberalization more vigorously than before. Especially air cargo liberalization is easier than air passenger liberalization because they realize that the development of open economy is based on free flow of logistics regardless of the competitiveness of their national flag carriers. As Korea is the leading country in the region to promote air liberalization, this paper reviews the importance and growing trend of air cargo, analyzes current air liberalization policy between Korea, Japan and China and the initial effects of open sky in the routes of Shandung-Korea, and suggests the new policies of air liberalization to promote free flow of air logistics.

• 한국항공우주법학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국항공우주법학회 2008년도 제40회 국제학술발표대회
• /
• pp.75-89
• /
• 2008

• 항공우주시스템공학회지
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.127-132
• /
• 2016

Recently, China & Japan have expanded their responding ADIZ(Air Defence Identification Zone) to implement each Government's maritime policy and to project their Air Power in preparation for maritime provocation & contingency, especially over the piled area where East Asia countries have claimed to have maritime jurisdiction one another. So this is to guide the Development Option for Korea Air Defence Identification Zone to cope with the maritime intentions of the neighboring countries, considering the international law for ADIZ, the maritime policy and the maritime sovereign & jurisdiction area of the Republic of Korea, etc.