• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.459-488
• /
• 2004

General interest in the out-of-court dispute resolution system are mounting in Korea, and the spread of ADR(alternative dispute resolution) is the worldwide trend. In addition, it was confirmed that the resolution of disputes by ADR such as the decision based on arbitration made by the Prime Ministerial Administrative Decision Committee is no longer in exclusive possession of the civil case. The activation of ADR could lead to the smooth agreement between parties by getting away from the once-for-all mode of decision such as the dismissal of the application or the cancellation of disposal and the like in relation to administrative cases for the years. In consequence, it is anticipated that the administrative litigation that applicants have filed by not responding to the administrative decision would greatly reduce in the future. But, it would be urgent to provide for the legal ground of the ADR system through the revision of related laws to take root in our society because ADR has no legal binding power relating to the administrative case due to the absence of its legal grounds. The fundamental reason for having hesitated to introduce ADR in relation to the administrative case for the years is the protective interest of the third party as well as the public interest that would follow in case the agreement on the dispute resolution between parties brings the dispute to a termination in the domain of the public law. The disputes related to the contract based on the public law and the like that take on a judicial character as the administrative act have been settled within the province of ADR by applying the current laws such as the Civil Arbitration Law, Mediation Law, but their application to the administrative act of the administrative agency that takes on a character of the public law has been hesitated. But as discussed earlier, there are laws and regulations that has the obscure distinction between public and private laws. But there is no significant advantage in relation to the distinction between public and private laws. To supplement and cure these defects it is necessary to include the institutional arrangement for protection of the rights and benefits of the third party, for example the provision of the imposition of the binding power on the result of ADR between parties, in enacting its related law. It can be said that the right reorganization of the out-of-court dispute resolution system in relation to the administrative case corresponds with the ideology of public administration for cooperaton in the Administrative Law. It is high time to discuss within what realm the out-of-court dispute resolution system, alternative dispute resolution system, can be accepted and what binding power is imposed on its result, not whether it is entirely introduced into the administrative case. It is thought that the current Civil Mediation Law or Arbitration Law provides the possibility of applying arbitration or mediation only to the civil case, thereby opening the possibility of arbitration in the field of the intellectual property right law. For instance, the act of the state is not required in establishing the rights related to the secret of business or copyrights. Nevertheless, the disputes arising from or in connection with the intellectual property rights law is seen as the administrative case, and they are excluded from the object of arbitration or mediation, which is thought to be improper. This is not an argument for unconditionally importing ADR into the resolution of administrative cases. Most of the Korean people are aware that the administrative litigation system is of paramount importance as the legal relief for administrative cases. Seeing that there is an independent administrative decision system based on the Administrative Decision Law other than administrative litigation in relation to administrative cases, the first and foremost task is the necessity for the shift in thinking of people, followed by consideration of the plan for relief of the rights through the improvement of the administrative decision system. Then, it is necessary to formulate the plan for the formal introduction and activation of ADR. In this process, energetic efforts should be devoted to introducing diverse forms of ADR procedures such as settlement conference, case evaluation, mini-trial, summary jury trial, early neutral evaluation adopted in the US as the method of dispute resolution other than compromise, conciliation, arbitration and mediation

• 한국엔터테인먼트산업학회논문지
• /
• 제15권4호
• /
• pp.167-186
• /
• 2021

본 연구는 노인체육진흥을 위해 체육인재양성의 새로운 방향을 제시하며, 다양한 체육 및 관련분야의 체육인재 양성의 현주소를 파악하고 빠른 시대변화에 대응하는 실무적이며, 실용적인 체육인재 중 노인 체육인재 양성의 활성화 방안을 구체적으로 제시하는데 목적이 있다. 이러한 목적을 수행하기 위하여 문헌연구방법을 진행하였으며, 주요 연구 내용으로는 노인체육진흥을 위해 노인체육 및 체육인재 양성의 현주소 분석, 그리고 노인체육과 체육인재양성의 문제점 및 발전과제의 분석을 통해 체육인재 중 노인 체육인재 양성의 활성화 방안을 종합적으로 다음과 같이 제시하였다. 첫째, 체육조직문화 환경 속에서의 융·복합적인 사고방식으로의 전환과 함께 융·복합적인 노인체육인재 양성을 위한 다양한 프로그램 개발 등 교육경쟁력을 강화한다. 이는 정부, 대학, 민간 기관 등과의 연계를 통해 노인체육인재의 전문성 강화와 실용적인 디지털멀티인재로서의 기능과 역할 수행을 의미한다. 둘째, 노인체육 및 관련학과 단위의 노인체육인재 양성을 위한 진로교육인프라 구축을 확대한다. 진로교육측면은 모든 분야에서 이슈가 되는 것으로 이는 재학생 및 졸업생에 대한 전방위의 DB구축을 의미한다. 셋째, 노인체육 전반에 연구 개발 지원을 확대한다. 이는 노인체육정책을 관장하고 있는 문화체육관광부와 보건복지부 그리고 민간 전문가 등과의 협치를 통해 사업을 효율적으로 추진하는 것을 의미한다. 넷째, 범정부차원의 체육인재육성 전략을 종합적, 체계적, 중장기적으로 수립해야 한다. 이는 체육분야뿐만 아니라 교육, 보건, 복지분야 등에서의 체육인재의 양성 및 발굴, 진로 및 취업, 재교육(역량 강화교육), 일자리 고용안정을 의미한다. 다섯째, 국무총리실 산하에 가칭)노인건강청 신설 운영을 제시한다. 이는 부서 간 협력 및 적극적인 파트너십을 통해 이중적 업무에 따른 예산낭비 등 효율성을 높일 수 있도록 하여 교육 확대 및 질적 제고를 강화해야 할 것이다.