• 기록학연구
• /
• 제40호
• /
• pp.95-130
• /
• 2014

고려대학교 아세아문제연구소의 '구 조선총독부 경무국 항일 독립운동관계 비밀기록'과 국사편찬위원회의 '경성지방법원 재판기록'(A)과 '경성지방법원(검사국) 편철문서'(B)는 경성지방법원 검사국이 접수 또는 작성하여 보관한 동일한 기록군이다. 'A'는 경성지방법원 검사국의 사건기록, 'B'는 동 검사국의 서무기록이며, 아세아문제연구소의 기록은 동 검사국의 사건기록과 서무기록이 함께 수집된 것이다. '사상' 탄압 통제와 관련된 내용이 많으며, 편철자명이나 열람자 보고자명, 접수문서의 분류로 보건대, 생산자는 경성지방법원 검사국 '사상부(思想部)'인 것 같다. 경성지방법원 검사국 서무기록에는 1925년 치안유지법 시행과 1928년 사상계 검사 배치, 사상부 설치라는 변화 과정이 담겨 있다. 이전에 비해 관할 경찰서의 일상적인 정보 보고가 많아졌고, 내용이 사상에 집중되었다. 사상 정보는 일반 민정(民情)에서 분리되었으며, '사상(계)' 우선의 기록관리가 이뤄졌다. 이제 검찰의 사무는 사상과 사상 아닌 것으로 나눠지며 전자에 비해 후자는 '경미'한 것으로 치부되었다. 또한 전 조선과 일본의 지방검사국 간에 사상사건 정보의 공유체계가 구축되었고, 간도관련 정보의 수집이 늘었다.

• Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management
• /
• 제21권4호
• /
• pp.263-293
• /
• 2014

This study reviews Korean public informatization policy implemented in last 20 years from the philosophical perspective and attempts to suggest directions to be considered in the future. To accomplish the research goal, this study first analyzes literature in the relevant areas, including philosophy of value, administrative ideology, and public informatization policy. Second, based on the results of literature review, criteria to analyze the public informatization policy are established. Then, the Korean public informatization policy is analyzed based on the established criteria. Lastly, implications for planning and implementing public informatization policy are suggested. Significance of the study lies in its attempt to examine public informatization policy from the philosophical perspective. However, due to its exploratory nature, this study has limitations including less rigorous measurement instruments, limited source of data, limited number of propositions established. Therefore, further studies are needed in these areas.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제33권1호
• /
• pp.211-245
• /
• 2002

세계2차 대전 후 서독과 동독은 분단이 되면서 자본주의와 사회주의 국가 체제로 41년 동안 서로 다른 길을 걷게됐다. 동독은 냉전시대에 소련의 영향권에서 새로운 이데올로기를 중심으로 새로운 국가건설을 시작했다. 이 과정에서 학술도서관 역시 새로운 사회주의 체제 하에서 변모를 해야만 했다. 변화된 국가적 환경에서 도서관 역시 이 변화를 거부할 수는 없었다. 이 변화의 과정에서 학술도서관은 국가 체제유지의 도구로 이용됐다.

• 한국언론정보학보
• /
• 제32권
• /
• pp.75-111
• /
• 2006

이 연구의 목적은 우리나라 언론 보도에서 정부 소스의 의제 속성에 의존하는 현상이 일어나고 있는가를 살펴본 다음, 정부의 중요정의자 기능과 관련하여 영향요인으로 거론되는 보도부정성, 보도이데올로기, 보도시기 등의 변수들이 가지는 영향력에 대해서 조사해 보는 것이다. 이러한 연구목적에 답하기 위해서 사회적인 논란을 불러왔던 행정수도 이전 관련 논의를 분석 케이스로 선택했으며, 이슈를 둘러싼 정부브리핑과 언론보도를 연구 텍스트로 선정하였다. 연구결과, 정부는 언론보도의 중요정의자 역할을 수행하는 것으로 나타났으며, 언론보도가 정부가 설정하는 이슈 속성의 테두리를 벗어나기 힘들다는 것을 보여주었다. 또한 언론의 부정성에도 불구하고 정부는 사안의 속성을 제한하는 중요정의자의 역할을 담당하고 있지만, 보도이데올로기나 사안의 갈등 시기 등의 영향권에서 자유롭지는 못하다는 것을 보여주고 있다.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제3권2호
• /
• pp.41-49
• /
• 2016

Since World War II nations have formed alliances for reasons of security and trade. Countries have seen international integration as an appropriate approach to resolving domestic and international political issues, improving their welfare by both transforming their infrastructures and increasing their foreign trade. While the majority of these relationships are straightforward d Turkey's relationship with the European Union is more complex due to differences in religion and, at times, political ideology from other Union members. As a candidate country Turkey has made advances towards the full membership of the European Union with the customs union being the most significant. The impact of customs union membership is discussed and the effects of the customs union on Turkey's trade and economy are examined from a perspective of different economic theories.

• Korean Journal of Acupuncture
• /
• 제34권2호
• /
• pp.71-81
• /
• 2017

Objectives : The purpose of this paper is to clarify the social characteristics of the authors of Huangdi Neijing such as status, class, and political ideology. Methods : We analyze the Neijing text and the social order and historical situations in the Han dynasty. Results : Some authors of the Neijing were the local medical officers whose salary was 100~400shi. Their positions were medical craftsmen(yigong) or chief medical craftsmen(yigongchang). They would have published the Neijing after the administrative reforms(146-145 BCE) that began after the suppression of the Rebellion of the Seven Kingdoms. The bureaucrat yigong(chang) would have expected to participate in the public health policy of the empire or kingdom as an acupuncture expert. They would have also expected to contribute to the welfare and health of the privileged intellectual group and the public, hoping to ascend in status and class. Conclusions : By investigating the social characteristics of the authors who composed the Neijing, its various aspects would be newly understood.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.459-488
• /
• 2004

General interest in the out-of-court dispute resolution system are mounting in Korea, and the spread of ADR(alternative dispute resolution) is the worldwide trend. In addition, it was confirmed that the resolution of disputes by ADR such as the decision based on arbitration made by the Prime Ministerial Administrative Decision Committee is no longer in exclusive possession of the civil case. The activation of ADR could lead to the smooth agreement between parties by getting away from the once-for-all mode of decision such as the dismissal of the application or the cancellation of disposal and the like in relation to administrative cases for the years. In consequence, it is anticipated that the administrative litigation that applicants have filed by not responding to the administrative decision would greatly reduce in the future. But, it would be urgent to provide for the legal ground of the ADR system through the revision of related laws to take root in our society because ADR has no legal binding power relating to the administrative case due to the absence of its legal grounds. The fundamental reason for having hesitated to introduce ADR in relation to the administrative case for the years is the protective interest of the third party as well as the public interest that would follow in case the agreement on the dispute resolution between parties brings the dispute to a termination in the domain of the public law. The disputes related to the contract based on the public law and the like that take on a judicial character as the administrative act have been settled within the province of ADR by applying the current laws such as the Civil Arbitration Law, Mediation Law, but their application to the administrative act of the administrative agency that takes on a character of the public law has been hesitated. But as discussed earlier, there are laws and regulations that has the obscure distinction between public and private laws. But there is no significant advantage in relation to the distinction between public and private laws. To supplement and cure these defects it is necessary to include the institutional arrangement for protection of the rights and benefits of the third party, for example the provision of the imposition of the binding power on the result of ADR between parties, in enacting its related law. It can be said that the right reorganization of the out-of-court dispute resolution system in relation to the administrative case corresponds with the ideology of public administration for cooperaton in the Administrative Law. It is high time to discuss within what realm the out-of-court dispute resolution system, alternative dispute resolution system, can be accepted and what binding power is imposed on its result, not whether it is entirely introduced into the administrative case. It is thought that the current Civil Mediation Law or Arbitration Law provides the possibility of applying arbitration or mediation only to the civil case, thereby opening the possibility of arbitration in the field of the intellectual property right law. For instance, the act of the state is not required in establishing the rights related to the secret of business or copyrights. Nevertheless, the disputes arising from or in connection with the intellectual property rights law is seen as the administrative case, and they are excluded from the object of arbitration or mediation, which is thought to be improper. This is not an argument for unconditionally importing ADR into the resolution of administrative cases. Most of the Korean people are aware that the administrative litigation system is of paramount importance as the legal relief for administrative cases. Seeing that there is an independent administrative decision system based on the Administrative Decision Law other than administrative litigation in relation to administrative cases, the first and foremost task is the necessity for the shift in thinking of people, followed by consideration of the plan for relief of the rights through the improvement of the administrative decision system. Then, it is necessary to formulate the plan for the formal introduction and activation of ADR. In this process, energetic efforts should be devoted to introducing diverse forms of ADR procedures such as settlement conference, case evaluation, mini-trial, summary jury trial, early neutral evaluation adopted in the US as the method of dispute resolution other than compromise, conciliation, arbitration and mediation

• 한국지역지리학회지
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.14-30
• /
• 2013

1945년 분단 이후 북한은 지명을 사회주의 혁명의 도구로서 이용하였고, 언어 정책의 일환으로 이를 관리하였다. 1952년 행정구역 개편과정에서 시 군 리 지명을 언어 관리 차원에서 바꾸었고, 1966년 지명조사 사업의 완료 이후 주체사상을 반영하면서 지명을 관리하였다. 지명의 전부 요소에 고유어와 인명을 이용한 지명이 적지 않게 등장하였고, 후부 요소도 남한과는 다른 용어를 사용하기 시작하였다. 지명 관리의 일환으로 사전을 적극적으로 편찬하였다. 지명 연구는 사회성과 역사성을 반영한 논문들이 발표되고 있다. 연구 주제는 1990년대 이전에는 사회주의 지명을 찬양하는 글들이 많아 발표되나 2000년대 이후에는 지역 내에서 지명 특성을 소개하는 글들의 비중이 높아졌다. 이 시기에는 지명으로 학위를 취득한 학자들이 증가하면서 이전의 연구 내용과 차이를 보이고 있다.

• 한국기록관리학회지
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.141-158
• /
• 2003

본고에서는 지식정보화의 발전에 따라 전개되는 새로운 현상과 변화들을 살펴보고 전통 행정과 뉴거버넌스의 비교를 통하여 전자정부의 의의를 도출하고, 전자정부의 모델을 제시하고 결론으로 차기 전자정부의 방향을 제시하였다. 새로운 현상과 변화로서는 제품과 서비스의 수렴형 모델로 변화, 사이버 주권의 딜레마 및 프라이버시와 정보보안의 위협 등을 들 수 있다. 한편 정부 주도적인 정부운영에서 NGO의 역할이 강화되는 뉴거버넌스로의 전환이 이루어지고 있으며 전자정부도 뉴거버넌스의 이념을 실현할 수 있도록 기여해야 한다. 이에 새로운 전자정부는 정부와 국민이 함께 구축 운영하는 체제로 전환되어야 한다. 이를 위해 공개키기반구조(PKI: Public Key Infrastructure)를 확산하고 전자민주주의(e-Democracy)의 활성화 및 국민이 용이하게 사용할 수 있는 사용자 인터페이스의 향상에 주력해야 한다.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.157-179
• /
• 2004

Currently major countries, including the USA, have developed and contrived to activate ADR(Alternative Dispute Resolution) in order to both choose effective means for dispute resolution and establish the reformation of the judicial system; thus meeting people's revamped expectations due to the rapid increase of, and diversification in, civil disputes. This is why there has been some haste in many countries to organize systems for this, so called, 'the Fundamental ADR Act' which regulates the essential structure to accelerate the use of ADR and strengthen the links with trial procedures. For example, in 1999 Germany revised it Civil Procedure Act, to allow for a pre-conciliation process in cases involving only small sums of money. Whilst, with regard to the Civil Procedure Act in France, new regulations have been introduced with regard to actions before either a suit or return to conciliation. In the United Kingdom, as far back as 1988, additions to the legal structure allowed for expansion of regulations applying to ADR. By 1999 the new ADR regulations were part of the legal structure of the UK Civil Procedure Act. The USA passed the federal law for ADR in 1998. Since then the world has tried to enact this model in UNCITRAL on international conciliation. When we consider this recent trend by the world's major countries, it is desirable that the fundamental law on ADR should be enacted in Korea also. This paper traces the object, and the regulatory content required, for the fundamental ADR law to be enacted in Korea's future. Firstly, the purpose of the fundamental ADR law is limited only to the private sector, including administrative and excluding judicial sector and arbitration, because in Korea the Judicial Conciliation of the Civil Disputes Act, the Family Disputes Act and the Arbitration Act already exist. Secondly I will I examine the regulatory content of the basic ADR Act, dividing it into: 1)regulations on the basic ideology of ADR, 2)those on the transition to trial procedures of ADR, and 3)those on the transition to ADR from trial procedures. In addition I will research the regulatory limitations of ADR.