• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제38권1호
• /
• pp.75-84
• /
• 2010

Recently, foreign labor standards accreditation system has been emerged as more firms outsource manufacturing works to global vendors focused manufacturing. This paper discuss and compare three major private labor accreditation systems and evaluate what kind of problems may emerge if they become the major global standards for labor practices. This paper concludes that private labor standards accreditation system needs more transparency in the process and should improve accountability by including other stakeholders in the process.

• 한국비블리아학회지
• /
• 제24권3호
• /
• pp.135-156
• /
• 2013

최근 들어, 고등교육기관으로서의 대학은 교육성과와 품질을 보장해야 할 사회적 책무성에 직면해 있다. 대학평가인증제도는 대학교육의 책무성을 담보하기 위한 수단으로써 국제적으로 널리 이용되고 있다. 미국의 대학평가인증기준은 물적, 인적자원 등 투입요소 대신에 문제해결능력, 비판적 분석력, 창의력과 같은 학습성과를 강조하고 있다. 또한, 미국의 대학평가인증기준은 정보활용능력을 주요 학습성과로 간주하고 있다. 본 연구는 도서관 및 정보활용능력의 관점에서 한국과 미국의 대학평가인증기준을 비교 분석하고, 한국의 대학평가인증기준에 정보활용능력에 관한 사항을 어떻게 적용해야 할 것인가 하는 기본 방향을 제시하는데 목적이 있다. 한국의 대학평가인증기준은 학습성과를 강화하는 측면에서 정보활용능력을 반영하고, 단순 강의 수준을 벗어나 도서관 사서와 담당교수와의 협력수업을 기준에 반영할 필요가 있다.

• 한국비블리아학회지
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.255-270
• /
• 2004

미국의 대학평가인정제를 개관하였다. 그리고 2000년을 전후하여 대폭적으로 개정된 여섯 개 지역별 대학평가 인정기준을 대학도서관에 대한 평가기준을 중심으로 분석하였다. 그 결과 여섯 가지 특징적 변화 경향을 파악 하였다. 즉 목적 기반의 평가, 성과 중심의 정성적 평가, 학생의 학습성과 강조, 도서관의 가르치는 역할 강조, 원격교육 서비스 강화, 그리고 규범성과 구체성의 후퇴가 그것이다. 연구자는 이러한 최신 경향에 대한 이해를 바탕으로 우리나라의 대학평가기준 중 도서관 관련 평가항목이 지향해야 할 방향을 제안하였다.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제21권3호
• /
• pp.3-11
• /
• 2018

The Conceiving-Designing-Implementing-Operating (CDIO) initiative is a worldwide organization with members from over 120 institutions for higher education, and it provides an innovative educational framework for producing the next generation of engineers. This paper compares the CDIO standards and syllabus to the accreditation criteria of Accreditation Board for Engineering Education of Korea, ABEEK to identify similarities and differences and to find points of improvement for ABEEK criteria. It is found that the basic concepts of ABEEK criteria correlates well with those of CDIO standards, while the CDIO standards and syllabus provide more detailed and well-defined guidelines for engineering programs. Finally, some discussions are presented on the differences between the two educational models, a voluntary-based CDIO model and an accreditation-based ABEEK model.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제36권6호
• /
• pp.1002-1011
• /
• 2006

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine characteristics of nursing science and identify expected outcomes from baccalaureate graduates, and to develop accreditation standards and criteria reflecting the characteristics of the nursing profession. Methods: A methodological research design was utilized in this study. Related literature reviews and the nursing education program goals and objectives of the 99 nursing schools in Korea were analyzed. A cross-sectional survey research design was utilized to test the validity of the developed characteristics of the nursing profession and their accreditation criteria and standards. The face validity was from the advisory committee and public committee hearing. Results: The characteristics of nursing science were defined with five concepts including humanity, scientific knowledge, professionalism, therapeutic relationship, and facilitating well-being. The expected outcomes from graduates were identified as providing holistic nursing, critical thinking, establishing professionalism and leadership, construction of a therapeutic relationship, and skilled nursing practice. Finally6 standards and 14 criteria reflecting the unique characteristics of the nursing profession were developed for accreditation. These proposed accreditation standards and criteria are a challenge to promote the quality of nursing science.

• 아동학회지
• /
• 제21권4호
• /
• pp.177-196
• /
• 2000

A large sample (1090) of randomly selected early childhood education professionals and government officials rated each of the 133 standards of "A Model for Institutional Accreditation for Early Childhood Education and Care"(Yang, 1999) on a scale of 1 (least important) to 5 (most important). Findings were that all kindergartens and child care centers should be evaluated for accreditation every 3 years with 3-6 months for self-study and on-site validation visits by representatives of the appropritates agencies for 1-2 days. Evaluation results are should be used by institution personnel as a guide to self-supervision, by government officials as a funding standard and by parents as criteria of program quality. Essential accreditation standards included: facilities and equipment; curriculum; nutrition, health and safety; administration and management; and support systems. Safety and teacher-child interactions were most highly rated while parent involvement was not highly rated.

• 한국산림과학회지
• /
• 제95권2호
• /
• pp.194-202
• /
• 2006

The purpose of this study was to provide necessary requirements on accreditation for forest culture and recreational interpretive programs in order to set up the enforcement regulations of the Forest Culture and Recreation Act. The intention of this study was to contribute to raising the qualitative standards of forest interpreters through the adoption of accreditation procedures for forest culture and recreational education programs, to establish detailed standards regarding the accreditation of forest interpreter training courses, and to provide materials and resources useful in creating forestry policies regarding forest interpreters and forest culture and recreation. This study examined five topics: 1) To establish conceptual understanding of the accreditation procedures for forest culture and recreation interpretive programs, 2) To understanding the present status of training programs and courses related to accreditation procedures for forest culture and recreation interpretive programs, and examining the status of current forest interpreter training courses, 3) To propose an operational scheme for accreditation procedures for forest culture and recreation programs, and develop the goal of an operation of the accreditation procedures for forest culture and recreation programs, 4) To propose an operational scheme for accreditation procedures for forest culture and recreational education programs, and the operational scheme for forest interpreter training courses, and 5) To establishing a commission to evaluate the accreditation procedures for forest culture and recreation programs and operating guidelines.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제28권3호
• /
• pp.251-256
• /
• 2018

The origin of hospital accreditation in Korea is the Hospital Standardization Program of the Korea Hospital Association. Current accreditation program implemented by the Korea Institute for Healthcare Accreditation has succeeded in stimulating quality improvement activities of participating hospitals since its launching in 2010. However it has been criticized due to some unintended consequences of accreditation. In order to fully enjoy the benefit of the accreditation program in Korea, national efforts to expand accreditation scheme and coverage, upgrade accreditation standards, insure substantiality of accreditation process, provide consumers with more useful information, and strengthen the professional capacity of accreditation organization will be needed.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.171-177
• /
• 2021

최근 우리나라 건설업계는 건설기술 인력 부족, 건설노동인력 고령화, 주 52시간 근무 등 다양한 건설환경 대응 방안으로 공업화공법 활성화에 대한 요구가 증가하고 있다. 공업화주택 인정제도는 공업화주택의 품질인정과 품질 향상 유도를 위하여 1992년에 도입되었으나 현재 6개 업체만 인정을 받았고, 인정 받은 공업화주택이 건설된 실적도 전무한 상황이다. 현재 우리나라 공업화주택 인정제도는 크게 인정 및 인정 취소기준, 공업화주택 건설촉진 기준으로 구성되어 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 공업화주택인정제도의 관련 규정을 심층분석하여, 각 규정에 따른 문제점을 도출하고, 이를 기반으로 공업화주택 인정제도 활성화를 위한 제도 개선방향을 도출하였다. 구체적인 공업화인정제도 방안으로는 현행 공업화 주택 인정 범위를 준주택까지 확대하는 방안, 공업화 주택의 성능 및 생산기준 개정, 공업화주택 활성화 지원을 위한 건축기준 완화 및 금융지원 등을 제안하였다. 향후 공업화주택 인정제도와 별도로 국내 공업화 건축시장이 활성화되지 못하는 주요 원인 중 하나인 경제성 문제를 해결하기 위해 공업화공법의 사회·경제·환경·기술적 파급효과에 대한 체계적 분석과 가시화를 통해 건설시장 패러다임을 전환을 적극적으로 유도할 필요가 있다.

• 한국의료질향상학회지
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.59-69
• /
• 2016

Objectives: Healthcare Accreditation Program in Korea started in 2011. The aim of this study is to contribute to the development of the Healthcare Accreditation Program in Korea by comparing the perception of the Healthcare Accreditation Program for the accredited hospitals and the surveyors. Methods: This study was performed targeting 77 accredited acute care hospitals and 245 surveyors who have surveyed acute care hospitals from 2010 to February 2014. They responded to our questionnaire via a survey website, and we analyzed the results. Results: We found that the hospitals rated the professionalism of surveyors more positively than surveyors. While average score of the hospitals was higher for 'The understanding of the accreditation standards and survey methods was correct' than that of the surveyors (p<0.01), average score of the surveyors was higher for 'Mediation and collaboration between surveyors were smooth' than that of the hospitals (p<0.05). And we found that the surveyors rated the Accreditation Program more positively than hospitals. While average score of the hospitals was higher for 'Surveyors have the professionalism' than that of the surveyors (p<0.05), average score of the surveyors was higher for 'It is easy to understand the accreditation standards and evaluation items' than that of the hospitals (p<0.01). Conclusion: In order to development of the accreditation program, it is necessary to strengthen the professionalism of surveyors and improve the acceptability of the accreditation program.