• Proceedings of the KWS Conference
• /
• 2009.11a
• /
• pp.63-63
• /
• 2009

최근 연비 향상 및 배기가스 저감을 위한 친환경 경량 굴삭기에 대한 연구가 활발히 진행되고 있다. 이러한 시도는 굴삭기의 소재의 강도를 490MPa급에서 700MPa급으로 고강도화를 통하여 작업장치의 경량화를 도모하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 중장비용 고강도 열연강재로 재발중인 ATOS70강재의 기본 용접성 및 GMAW 용접부 특성을 검토하였다. 사용한 시험재는 현장시험재인 14~16mmt두께의 ATOS70강재를 사용하였고, 용접경화성 및 저온균열감수성을 평가하였다. 또한 GMAW 용접을 실시하여 용접부의 이음부 특성을 검토하였다. 14mmt 두께의 ATOS70강재의 탄소당량은 약 0.44수준이고, 모재 인장강도는 약 760MPa급 수준을 보였다. 한편 최고경도시험에 의한 용접부 최도경도는 약 300Hv 수준을 보였으며, 경사 y-groove구속시험에 의한 14mmt두께의 한계예열온도는 상온이었다. 한편 GMAW 용접부 인장시험결과 740MPa급 이상의 인장강도를 확보하였고, $-5^{\circ}C$ 용접부 Charpy 충격시험결과 48J 이상의 충격인성을 나타내었다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Precision Engineering Conference
• /
• 2009.06a
• /
• pp.521-522
• /
• 2009

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• v.12 no.5
• /
• pp.299-306
• /
• 2020

PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of six recently introduced intraoral scanners (IOSs) for single crown preparations isolated from the complete arch, and to determine the effect of scanning sequence on accuracy. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A complete arch with right and left canine preparations for single crowns was used as a study model. The reference dataset was obtained by scanning the complete arch using a highly accurate industrial scanner (ATOS Core 80, GOM GmbH). Six different IOSs (Trios, iTero, Planmeca Emerald, Cerec Omnicam, Primescan, and Virtuo Vivo) were used to scan the model ten times each. The scans performed with each IOS were divided into two groups, based on whether the scanning sequence started from the right or left quadrant (n=5). The accuracy of digital impression was evaluated using three-dimensional analyzing software (Geomagic Studio 12, 3D Systems). The Kruskal Wallis and Mann- Whitney U statistical tests for trueness analysis and the One-way ANOVA test for precision analysis were performed (α=.05). RESULTS. The trueness and precision values were the lowest with the Primescan (25 and 10 ㎛), followed by Trios (40.5 and 11 ㎛), Omnicam (41.5 ㎛ and 18 ㎛), Virtuo Vivo (52 and 37 ㎛), iTero (70 and 12 ㎛) and Emerald (73.5 and 60 ㎛). Regarding trueness, iTero showed more deviation when scanning started from the right (P=.009). CONCLUSION. The accuracy of digital impressions varied depending on the IOS and scanning sequence used. Primescan had the highest accuracy, while Emerald showed the most deviation in accuracy for single crown preparations.