• 한국프랜차이즈경영연구
• /
• 제11권4호
• /
• pp.45-57
• /
• 2020

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine the importance and priority arising from the relationship between MRO-office supplies franchisor ("franchisor") and franchisees through an in-depth investigation. In particular, with respect to the MRO-Office franchise industry, we would like to make meaningful contributions in the decision-making process by comparing and contrasting factors that affect the importance and priority of communication, conflict, support and satisfaction through AHP analysis. Research design, data, and methodology: After completion of AHP analysis, the study will also identify factors in order of priority and factors of importance between the franchisor and franchisees. Another purpose of this study is to evaluate and propose business relationship strategies between the franchisor and franchisees. Through AHP analysis, this study will facilitate the relationship between the franchisor and franchise, and determine the factors of importance and factors in order of priority. Result: This study evaluates the differences and priorities of the two groups arising from the relationship between the franchisor and the franchisees through AHP analysis after separately analyzing the franchisor. In this study, the franchisees find that communication is the most important factor, then support as the second most important factor between the two groups. In contrast, the franchisor finds that support is the most important factor followed by communication between the two groups. Conclusions: This analysis demonstrates the discrepancy in evaluating important factors from the perspectives of the franchisor and the franchisees. The largest discrepancy between the franchisor and franchisees comes from an information system related to communication factors. This effectively means that the franchisor has an understanding of this inadequate information system on the part of franchisees but this understanding is not deemed an important factor. The franchisees recognize and focus on the need to obtain feedback from the franchisor regarding management improvement as the most important factor rather than the ability of the franchisor to guide them through the franchisees' operations. To this end, the franchisor should be more flexible in dealing with the problem of improving the work required by the franchisees. For this study, a survey was conducted on employees of MRO-office supplies franchisor, franchisees, and employees and completed based on AHP analysis.

• 무역학회지
• /
• 제47권2호
• /
• pp.19-29
• /
• 2022

This study evaluated the importance of automobile procurement logistics using AHP. Although automobile procurement and logistics is represented by JIT, internal and external risk factors for the automobile and logistics industries are increasing, so it is necessary to re-evaluate them and establish countermeasures. Therefore, this study conducted AHP analysis targeting 30 automobile procurement and logistics experts. Through previous studies and interviews, 4 factors for Tier 1 and 12 factors for Tier 2 were derived. As a result of AHP, the logistics factor was analyzed as the most important and the cost factor was less important than the other factors. This means that supply chain operation is more important than cost, and it is analyzed that stopping all supply chain participants is more damaging than logistics or inventory costs. Such research can provide implications not only for the automotive supply chain but also other industries with similar characteristics, and it is considered to be a meaningful study at the present time when the global supply chain is being reorganized.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제30권2호
• /
• pp.67-74
• /
• 2007

The objective of this research is to select the most effective technique among task related techniques(motion & time study, job redesign, physical environment improvement) for improving work efficiency in shipbuilding enterprise. This study consists of several principal steps. The first step is to design critical criteria in evaluating work efficiency in ship-building enterprises. The second step is to develop sub-criteria of the critical criteria. The third step is to develop a four level AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) structure using the critical criteria, sub-criteria and techniques among task related techniques. The fourth step is to develop the pairwise comparison matrix at each level of AHP structure, which was based on survey data collected at the H heavy industry. And the last step is to select the most effective technique among task related techniques using AHP analysis. The result of AHP analysis has shown clear difference in priority among task related techniques in terms of work efficiency of the shipbuilding enterprise: The reduction of normal time is more important than the reduction of allowance time in improving of the work efficiency. Motion & time study is the most important technique for the reduction of normal time, and physical environment improvement is the most important technique for the reduction of allowance time as well.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 3th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.1364-1369
• /
• 2009

The building construction projects include a variety of risk factors due to uncertainties. To succeed in the projects, it is important how risks are managed. Risk management is composed of identification, analysis and response. Especially, the risk analysis is important to objectively calculate significance of risk factors. This paper evaluates a method to find priorities of risks using the AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process). The method has some defects; (1) the consistency becomes weak as the number of pair-wise compared risks is large, and (2) the input and output procedures are complex when risks are added to or removed from a risk database. Thus the paper adopt the PROMETHEE(Preference Ranking Organization METHod Enrichment Evaluations) analysis process which is able to overcome the limitation of the AHP restricted to 9 risk factors. The PROMETHEE method makes the procedure of risk analysis simple, when the risk factors pull out and put in the risk database. The purpose of this study is to prove the possibility of the PROMETHEE analysis process by being compared with AHP.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.247-262
• /
• 2011

본 논문은 광양항의 발전전략을 수립하기 위하여 SWOT/AHP분석을 실시하고자 한다. SWOT분석은 보통 전략수립단계에 있어서 내 외부 환경을 분석하기 위해서 사용된다. SWOT/AHP분석은 Kurttila et al(2000)이 SWOT분석의 유용성을 개선하기 위해 제안한 방법으로 SWOT분석의 결과는 단순히 SWOT그룹 내에 어떤 요인들이 있는가를 확인하는 것에 불과하다. 따라서 AHP분석과 결합함으로써 SWOT분석에서 도출된 요인들에 대한 상대적인 중요도를 평가하여 전략수립에 활용하는데 목적이 있다. 분석결과를 요약하면, SWOT그룹의 상대적 중요도는 기회(0.376), 강점(0.259), 위협(0.206), 약점(0.159) 순으로 나타났다. 다음으로 SWOT요인 별로 살펴보면, 강점요인의 상대적 중요도에서는 저렴한 화물처리비용(0.383), 우수한 항만입지(0.347), 광범위한 배후지(0.270) 순으로 나타났다. 약점요인의 상대적 중요도는 효율적인 통관시스템 미비(0.511), 복합운송 연계성 미비(0.315), 항만전문인력의 부족(0.173) 순으로 나타났다. 기회요인의 상대적 중요도는 각종 인프라 구축으로 수송체계 개선(0.461), 주변지역에 대한 연관산업단지 개발지속(0.326), 동북아지역의 물동량 증가추세(0.214) 순으로 나타났다. 위협요인의 상대적 중요도는 각종 인프라 구축으로 수송체계 개선(0.411), 주변항만과의 경쟁(0.400), 복합운송업체의 영세성(0.189) 순으로 나타났다. 평가대상이 되는 각 그룹별 세부요인들의 종합순위를 얻기 위하여 의사결정 항목들의 상대적 중요도를 종합화하였다. SWOT그룹별 세부속성요인들의 최종 중요도(가중치) 결과를 살펴보면, 기회요인 속하는 각종 인프라구축으로 인한 수송체계 개선(0.173), 주변지역에 대한 연관산업단지 개발지속(0.123)이 가장 높은 중요도를 보였고, 저렴한 화물처리비용, 우수한 항만입지, 항만운영의 융통성 결여, 주변항만과의 경쟁, 효율적 통관시스템 미비의 순으로 나타났다.

• 수산해양교육연구
• /
• 제25권1호
• /
• pp.139-151
• /
• 2013

Recently, in the context of increased interest for marine tourism, Jeju region of South Korea has attractive waterfront space and also has potential requirements for development. The objective of this paper was to analyze the priority for resource development of waterfront in Jeju region. In order to calculate the importance of factors related to the development of waterfront in Jeju area, this study conducted exploratory factor analysis to extract the factors and established the AHP model based on the factors name focusing on a total of 198 tourists. In this study, in accordance with the procedures of AHP analysis, pairwise comparisons were conducted focusing on a total of 15 experts. Especially, difference test between groups (academics and bureaucratic) was conducted. In the 1st criterion for evaluation, 'exploring experience' factor is most important thing and 'facilities & infrastructure' factors were in the following order. In the secondary criterion, AHP analysis showed that experience facilities, environmental management, and absence of residents consciousness were the important factors. In the future time, the results of this research can be utilized as basic data in the aspects of tourism development in Jeju waterfront region.

• 대한한의진단학회지
• /
• 제19권3호
• /
• pp.159-171
• /
• 2015

Objectives: Lately, non alcoholic fatty liver patients are increasing rapidly and the average age of patients are getting younger. Non alcoholic fatty liver often represents asymptomatic and korean pattern diagnosis is difficult to implement without symptoms. This study aimed to analyze interrelationship between non alcoholic fatty liver disease and Injinho-tang. Methods The AHP is a systematic procedure for analyzing the elements of any problem hierarchically. Based on survey of expertise, as series of pairwise comparison judgements is performed to evaluate the various elements in the hierarchy. We are expected to use the AHP analysis that would apply to oriental doctor's diagnostic process analysis. Results and conclusion Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease induced complex causes of the metabolic syndrome. Injinho-tang has been widely used disease that causes jaundice and liver biliary disease. According to AHP analysis, LFT is the most important facor in choosing Injinho-tang on non alcoholic fatty liver disease. BMI and body composition by bioelectrical impedance analysis are the next important factors. Personal hot temper also gives a big impact on choicing Injinho-tang on non alcoholic fatty liver disease.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제10권10호
• /
• pp.2886-2892
• /
• 2009

본 논문은 고객들이 인터넷 쇼핑몰을 이용함에 있어서 가장 중요시 하는 요인이 무엇인지를 탐색하는 것이었다. 중요요인은 요인분석을 이용하여 도출하였으며, 도출된 중요 요인인 주문속성, 상품속성, 배송속성을 대상으로 하여 AHP 분석을 실시하였다. 분석결과 상품속성이 가장 중요한 요인으로 작용하는 것으로 나타났으며, 상품속성 중에서 가장 중요하게 인식되고 있는 세부 요인들은 사후서비스로서 여기에는 반품 및 환불보장, 반품 및 교환허용 등의 순서로 나타났다. 그리고 그 다음의 중요 요인으로는 인센티브의 제공이었으며, 여기에는 할인쿠폰 제공, 포인트 적립제도 등의 세부요인이 중요하게 작용하는 것으로 분석되었다.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제19권4호
• /
• pp.822-847
• /
• 2016

미래 산업 유지를 위하여 세계적으로 지속가능한 에너지의 중요성이 부각되고 있다. 다양한 신재생 에너지 중 수소에너지는 청정에너지로서 각광받고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 수소에너지산업 인프라 구축시에 필요한 전략 수립을 위하여 SWOT/AHP 분석을 적용하였다. 우선 수소에너지 산업 인프라 구축시 요구되는 요인들을 추출하였고, SWOT matrix를 재구성하기 위하여 전문가의 의견을 조사하였다. 쌍대비교를 하여 개발된 요인들의 상대적 중요도를 알기 위하여 AHP 분석을 실시하였다. SWOT 분석과 AHP 분석을 적용하여 얻은 연구 결과를 기초로 하여 향후 수소에너지산업 인프라와 관련된 전략 계획의 수립 방안을 제시하였다.

• 한국품질경영학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국품질경영학회 2006년도 추계 학술대회
• /
• pp.31-37
• /
• 2006

The objective of this research is to select the most effective technique from task related techniques(motion & time study, job redesign, physical environment improvement) for improving work efficiency in shipbuilding enterprise. This study consists of several principal steps. The first step is to design critical criteria in evaluating work efficiency in shipbuilding enterprises. The second step is to develop sub-criteria of the critical criteria. The third step is to develop a four level AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process)structure using the critical criteria, sub-criteria and techniques from task related techniques. The fourth step is to develop the pairwise comparison matrix by each level of AHP structure, which was based on survey data collected at the H heavy industry. And the last step is to select the most effective technique from task related techniques using AHP analysis. The result of AHP analysis has shown clear difference in priority among task related techniques in terms of work efficiency of the shipbuilding enterprise: The reduction of normal time has more importance than the reduction of allowance time, motion & time study techniques are most important for the reduction of normal time, physical environment improvement is most important for the reduction of allowance time as well.