• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제20권4호
• /
• pp.74-96
• /
• 2010

The purpose of this empirical study is to evaluate efficiency of the regional public hospitals, using DEA(Data Envelopment Analysis). to do this, we design a DEA-AR/AHP Hybrid model to evaluate efficiency of 34 Regional Public Hospitals. the proposed model is developed by adding Acceptance Region(AR). using analytical hierarchy process(AHP). this model is compared with those of typical DEA models. Financial data used in this study were obtained from Database of the Korea Association Regional Public Hospital and analyzed using DEA model. As a result of analysis, This study found that the DEA-AR/AHP Hybrid model was superior to those typical DEA models in determining the priority among efficient hospitals. the result of this study can provide helpful information to evaluate the efficiency of public hospitals for efficient operational management, to develop more precise measurement for the priority of the efficient hospitals.

• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.81-89
• /
• 2003

This research suggests the FD-AHP decision making model for Construction Projects which is composed of two main method to prevent a ranking invert situation ; First, to make the consensus of the experts consistent, we utilize Fuzzy-Delphi method to adjust the fuzzy rating of every expert to achive the consensus condition with the fuzzy linguistic presentation. Second, to handle vague linguistic presentation caused by expert's experiences and subjective judgement, we propose Fuzzy-AHP which is able to enhance precision of construction projects decision mating situation. Moreover, with the correlation analysis, we show that the validity of the FD-AHP model under a decision making task specially on where highly demanded expert's experiences and intuition.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제28권2호
• /
• pp.179-194
• /
• 2012

본 연구는 컨테이너터미널의 서비스 투입자원 중 장비를 중점으로 컨테이너터미널의 효율성 비교 평가하기 위해 DEA와 AHP 기법을 혼합한 AHP/DEA 통합모형을 적용하였다. 분석은 광양항(GICT, KEC, KIT), 부산항(HBCT, KBCT, DPCT, UTC, 감만부두) 그리고 부산신항(PNC, PNIT, HJNC, HPNT)의 12개 운영사를 대상으로 하였다. 제안된 AHP/DEA 통합모형은 DEA 모형의 가중치간의 불균형으로 인하여 잘못 평가된 DMU 발생가능성과 효율적인 DMU간의 우열에 대한 변별의 어려움을 극복하기 위해 DEA-AR(Assurance Region)모형을 적용하였고, DEA-AR모형의 가중치 범위를 산출하기 위해 전문가의 의견을 객관적인 가중치로 변환할 수 있는 AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) 방법론을 사용하였다. 연구모형의 투입변수는 C/C 수, TC 수, YT 수, RS 수로 하였고 산출변수는 컨테이너 물동량으로 하였다. 연구결과 AHP/DEA 통합모형은 기존의 항만 및 컨테이너터미널의 효율성 평가에 사용되었던 DEA, 또는 DEA 응용모형에 비해 최고의 효율성을 가지는 컨테이너터미널을 선정에 있어 유연하고, 우수한 능력이 있음을 분석결과의 비교를 통해 알 수 있었다. 분석결과를 보면 하역장비 효율성이 100%로 달성한 터미널은 DPCT로 나타났고, 상대적으로 부산항 터미널들의 장비 효율성이 높은 것으로 분석되었다.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.25-54
• /
• 2005

In this study, priority setting model of new promising IT industries which will be the growth engines for the Korean IT industry, was established. Based on the AHP model, priority setting of IT new promising IT industries was conducted. Firstly, the selection cases of the new promising IT industries and major priority setting methodologies including the AHP methodology, were analyzed. The AHP model was selected as the most feasible methodology for priority setting of the new IT industries, among the various priority setting methodologies. Secondly, in setting up the AHP model for prioritization of the new promising If industries, a 'goal' was established to be priority setting of the new promising IT industries, and an 'alternatives' to be 18 new promising IT industries. Then a logical and a systematic assessment criteria including 5 main criteria('Technological Innovation', 'Market Ability', 'SPin-off Effect', 'Public Benefit', 'Strategic Importance') and 14 sub-criteria, were developed for priority setting of the 18 new promising industries. Finally, with the AHP model, the substantial analysis was made to set up priority of the 18 new promising IT industries. The substantial analysis showed the following priority setting results and implications for the 18 new promising IT industries.

• Journal of information and communication convergence engineering
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.97-104
• /
• 2015

In this paper, we propose a data envelopment analysis (DEA) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) integrated model to improve the selection process in the acquisition of a weapon system which is the key component to the success of the project. In particular, we applied DEA in the first stage to choose a frontier group among the candidates in the selection process of the next-generation fighter system (the 3rd FX) in Korea. Then, by using the Delphi technique, we surveyed military experts and applied AHP to determine the best choice among the candidates. The results of the study match the actual decision made by the Korean government in the weapon system acquisition. The results of the proposed DEA-AHP integrated method in the selection of the next-generation fighter systems in Korea demonstrate the usefulness of the method. In this paper, we also discuss the future implications of the proposed model.

• 한국농공학회논문집
• /
• 제54권5호
• /
• pp.57-67
• /
• 2012

This paper presents the Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) to evaluate water resources plan for agricultural reservoir. Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE) and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) were used to estimate weight and priority of alternatives to find out the most reasonable and efficient way of water resources assessment. The 6 criteria that both decision maker and beneficiary are satisfied have been identified to secure agricultural water resources and then the priority of 10 subcriteria was set. An enhanced PROMETHEE-AHP model was used to perform pairwise comparison and find out the priority of each alternative because the existing decision making model have uncertainty and ambiguity. Comparison analysis of decision making models was carried out to find a way of suitable decision making and validity of PROMETHEE-AHP model was suggested.

• 대한산업공학회지
• /
• 제32권1호
• /
• pp.18-28
• /
• 2006

Some issues which should be considered in an R&D project selection problem are as follows: First, quantitative analysis on the efficiencies of R&D projects is required to guarantee objective validity in the evaluation of the projects. For this reason, the methodology for selecting R&D projects should be based on mathematical models that perform quantitative analysis. Second, in general there are ordinal factors like Likert-scale in the data for evaluating R&D projects. Previous researches, however, couldn't suggest explicit methods incorporating these ordinal factors into models. Third, for the R&D project selection problems with limited resources like budget, it is necessary to decide the perfect ranking of the all projects. This paper develops a mathematical model that can be applicable to the problems of selecting R&D projects with the previous features. In this paper, we improve the original DEA model for evaluating efficiency to incorporate ordinal factors and suggest a new model which can decide the perfect ranking of all projects by merging the improved DEA model and AHP method. Furthermore a web-based R&D project selection system using the DEA/AHP model suggested in this paper is developed and illustrated.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.133-151
• /
• 2005

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the international competition power between Korean ports and Chinese ports according to the port efficiency scores of DEA(Data Envelopment Analysis) by newly introducing the priority vector of AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) to the DEA method. Empirical analysis shows the followings: First, there was not big changes of DEA rankings when we use the input-oriented CCR and BCC models after introducing the AHP priority vectors to the input variables. Yantian Port's competition power was declined, but that of Busan Port was up in the BCC model. Second, there was some changes of DEA rankings when we use the output-oriented CCR and BCC models after introducing the AHP priority vectors to the output variables. Rankings of Dalian, Qingdao, Shanghai Ports were up. But Shekou, Yantian Ports showed the declined ranking position in the CCR model. In the BBC model, rankings of Shanghai and Busan Ports were up. But those of Shekou and Yantian Ports were declined. The main policy implication based on the findings of this study is that The Ministry of Maritime Affairs & Fisheries in Korea and China should introduce AHP and DEA approaches when they measure the international competition power by using the porrt efficiency scores of DEA.

• 지식경영연구
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.109-132
• /
• 2018

Recently, new financial services related to FinTech has gained attention more and more. Online P2P financial services transactions such as FinTech require careful examination of the constituents of information systems as an investment is made based on the information presented on the online platform without direct face-to-face contact. The purpose of this study is to find out the success factors of online P2P Lending service among FinTech. To serve the purpose, we build IS (information system) success model, and then use Kano model and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (Fuzzy-AHP) to find out factors for the success of online P2P Lending service. In particular, this study uses Kano model to classify information system satisfaction factors and to calculate the satisfaction coefficient. The Kano model, however, has a drawback of evaluating single criterion. Therefore, we use multi-criteria decision-making technique such as Fuzzy-AHP to derive the relative importance of the factors. The analysis results show different results depending on the analysis technique. In the Kano model, most of the information system factors are a one-dimensional quality attribute. The satisfaction coefficient is highest for personalized service, followed by the responsiveness of service, ease of using a system, understanding of information, usefulness of information' reliability. The service reliability is the highest in dissatisfaction coefficient, followed by system security, service responsiveness, system stability, and personalized service. The results of the Fuzzy-AHP analysis shows that the usefulness of information quality, the personalization of service quality, and the security of system quality are the significant factors and the stability of system quality was a secondary factor.

• 문화기술의 융합
• /
• 제10권3호
• /
• pp.421-426
• /
• 2024

계층화분석과정(analytic hierarchy process, AHP)는 쌍대비교를 이용하여, 사람들의 판단기준을 객관적인 수치로 변환해준다. 그런데 너무 많은 쌍대비교를 필요로 한다는 점이 문제이다. 본 연구의 목적은 표준 AHP보다 간편하면서도, 결과물은 유사하게 나오는 새로운 방식의 의사결정지원시스템을 만드는 것이다. 기존 연구들은 복잡한 쌍대비교 과정을 감소시키기 위하여 과정 분리(process separation) 방식을 가장 많이 사용하였다. 본 연구가 채택한 과정 분리 방법은 "분리와 혼합 방식"이다. 즉, 1)판단기준을 평가할 때는 정규 AHP 과정을 사용하고, 2)대안을 비교평가 할 때는 다속성효용모형(multi-attributive utility technique, MAUT)을 적용한다. 이 Hybrid 모형의 과정 감축효과를 이론적으로 도출하기 위하여 정보입력 횟수를 계산하는 산식을 만들었다. 그런 다음, 이 AHP-MAUT Hybrid 모형을 실제 분석 사례인 경기도 주민들이 분당-강남역 간 통근할 때 어떤 교통수단들을 선택하는지 분석하는 사례에 적용하였다. 그 결과 Hybrid 모형을 적용할 때 계산과정이 AHP 모형을 사용했을 때와 비교하여 42.03% 감소하였다. 그리고 Hybrid model을 적용한 주민들의 선택 결과와 표준 AHP를 이용한 주민들의 선택 결과를 서로 비교하였다. 혼동모형에서 도출한 두 모형 간의 선택 일치도(CA)는 82.1%로서, 상당한 정도로 일관성이 있다 할 수 있을 정도였다. 결론적으로 본 연구가 목적하는 바는 AHP보다 간단하고, 편리하면서도 동등하게 효과적인 의사결정지원시스템을 개발하는 것인데, AHP-MAUT Hybrid 모형이 그 목적에 부합하였다. 이런 결과에 힘입어 Hybrid 모형의 적용사례가 증가한다면, 그것이 표준 AHP의 대안 중 하나로 고려될 수 있다는 점이 본 연구의 기여이다.