• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제42권2호
• /
• pp.229-245
• /
• 2003

In this paper, we present a review of research perspectives and investigations in collegiate mathematics education from the four decades of development in the journal published by Korea Society of Mathematical Education. Research of mathematics education at the tertiary level, which had been a minor area in mathematics education, has made a significant development in the last decade in Europe md U.S.A. In this context, international journals for research in mathematics education were selected to comparatively examine and identify research trends and tasks in collegiate mathematics education. Based on the analysis of domestic at international journals, we present recommendations for further the development of Korean collegiate mathematics education research. First it is necessary to diversify the topics of educational research. Korean research of mathematics education at the tertiary level has been limited to the issues of curriculum developments, teacher education and computer technology. It is necessary to pursue more various topics such as conceptual development mathematical attitude and belief gender, socio-cultural aspect of teaching and teaming mathematics. Second, it is necessary to apply research methods for systematic investigations. It is important to note that international research of mathematics education introduces variety of research methods such as observation, interview, and survey in order to develop grounded theory of mathematics education. We end with pedagogical implications of the analyses presented and general conclusions concerning the perspectives for the future in collegiate mathematics education.

• 대한수학교육학회지:수학교육학연구
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.313-326
• /
• 1998

The purpose of this study is to verify the meaning of preformal proof and its didactical significance in mathematics education. A preformal proof plays a more important role in mathematics education, because nowadays in mathematics a proof is considered as an important fact from a sociological point of view. A preformal proof was classified into four categories: a) action proof, b) geometric-intuitive proof, c) reality oriented proof, d) proof by generalization from paradiam. An educational significance of a preformal proof are followings: a) A proof is not identified with a formal proof. b) A proof is not only considered from a symbolic level, but also from enactive and iconic level. c) A preformal proof generates a formal proof and convinces pupils of a formal proof d) A preformal proof is psychologically natural. e) A preformal proof changes a conception of what is a proof. Therefore a preformal proof is expected to teach in school mathematics from the elementary school to the secondary school.

• 대한수학교육학회지:학교수학
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.409-444
• /
• 2014

수학교육 연구 공동체에서는 모델링 활동을 통한 수학 학습에 대한 논의들이 지속되어 왔다. 모델링 활동은 대안적인 수학 교수 학습 방법으로 논의되어 왔으나, 모델링 활동을 통하여 이루어지는 수학 학습은 어떠한 성격을 갖는지, 그리고 이는 어떠한 과제 설계와 수업 실행을 통하여 달성할 수 있는지에 대한 합의점은 도출되지 못한 실정이다. 모델링 활동을 통한 수학 학습을 시도해 온 선행 연구들의 논의로부터, 본 연구에서는 모델링 활동이 메타수준의 수학적 담론 생성과 메타규칙의 변화를 포함하는 메타수준 학습을 촉진할 수 있을 것으로 판단하였다. 이에 본 연구에서는 메타수준 학습을 촉진할 수 있는 모델링 과제 설계와 수업 실행 방안을 도출하고, 이를 실행하여 수학 교수 학습에서 모델링 활동의 잠재력을 확인하는 데 목적을 둔다.

• 대한수학교육학회지:수학교육학연구
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.81-109
• /
• 1999

This study aims to reflect the basic principles and teaching-teaming principles of Realistic Mathematics Education in order to suppose an way in which mathematics as an activity is carried out in primary school. The development of what is known as RME started almost thirty years ago. It is founded by Freudenthal and his colleagues at the former IOWO. Freudenthal stressed the idea of matheamatics as a human activity. According to him, the key principles of RME are as follows: guided reinvention and progressive mathematisation, level theory, and didactical phenomenology. This means that children have guided opportunities to reinvent mathematics by doing it and so the focal point should not be on mathematics as a closed system but on the process of mathematisation. There are different levels in learning process. One should let children make the transition from one level to the next level in the progress of mathematisation in realistic contexts. Here, contexts means that domain of reality, which in some particular learning process is disclosed to the learner in order to be mathematised. And the word of 'realistic' is related not just with the real world, but is related to the emphasis that RME puts on offering the students problem situations which they can imagine. Under the background of these principles, RME supposes the following five instruction principles: phenomenological exploration, bridging by vertical instruments, pupils' own constructions and productions, interactivity, and interwining of learning strands. In order to reflect how to realize these principles in practice, the teaming process of algorithms is illustrated. In this process, children follow a learning route that takes its inspiration from the history of mathematics or from their own informal knowledge and strategies. Considering long division, the first levee is associated with real-life activities such as sharing sweets among children. Here, children use their own strategies to solve context problems. The second level is entered when the same sweet problems is presented and a model of the situation is created. Then it is focused on finding shortcomings. Finally, the schema of division becomes a subject of investigation. Comparing realistic mathematics education with constructivistic mathematics education, there interaction, reflective thinking, conflict situation are many similarities but there are alsodifferences. They share the characteristics such as mathematics as a human activity, active learner, etc. But in RME, it is focused on the delicate balance between the spontaneity of children and the authority of teachers, and the development of long-term loaming process which is structured but flexible. In this respect two forms of mathematics education are different. Here, we learn how to develop mathematics curriculum that respects the theory of children on reality and at the same time the theory of mathematics experts. In order to connect the informal mathematics of children and formal mathematics, we need more teachers as researchers and more researchers as observers who try to find the mathematical informal notions of children and anticipate routes of children's learning through thought-experiment continuously.

• 한국학교수학회논문집
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.133-144
• /
• 1999

This study aims at identifying the effect of problem posing on the academic achievement in high school mathematics. As subjects of the study, two classes of first grade in high school were selected. One of them was treated with problem posing learning, the other was treated with learning-in-a-body. Each has 40 students and was also divided into two groups(high- level and low-level) according to their learning-level. Two instruments were used for this study. One was the teaching-learning method developed by the researcher. The other was TTCT(Torrance Test of Creative Thinking). The 't-test' was used for this study and the significant level of test was within 5 percent. The results of this study are as follows: 1. The group with problem posing learning showed significantly higher academic achievement(learning-ability) than the one with learning-in-a-body. 2. There was no significant difference in the academic achievement(creativity) between the two groups. But there was significant difference in the creative factors. 3. There was no significant differences in the academic achievement between high-level-groups in each group. 4. There was significant difference in the academic achievement (learning-ability) between low-level groups in each group. And there was significant difference in the creative factors. On the basis of the results above, the following conclusions could be made. The problem posing learning method was more effective in the academic achievement in highschool mathematics than learning-in-a-body. Especially low-level group was more effective than high-level group. These facts implies that it is more effective for a teacher to adopt the problem posing learning considering the students' learning-levels.

• 한국초등수학교육학회지
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.143-159
• /
• 2018

수학 문제해결 교육 연구에 있어서 문제해결 과정에 나타나는 인지적, 정의적 요소의 상호작용 및 메타정의적 측면에 대한 연구의 비중이 점차 증가하고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 수학 학습 성취 수준에 따라 초등학생의 문제해결 과정에 작용하는 메타정의의 기능적 특성을 파악하기 위하여 빈도 분석과 사례 분석을 병행하였다. 수학 학습 성취 수준에 따라 협업적 문제해결 활동에서 나타나는 메타정의 출현 빈도, 메타정의 유형별 빈도, 메타정의의 메타적 기능 유형별 빈도를 비교 분석하였다. 또한, 수학 학습 성취 수준별 메타정의의 메타적 기능 유형별 사례의 분석을 통하여 메타정의의 실제적인 작용 메카니즘을 파악하였다. 그 결과, 수학 학습 성취 하 수준 집단의 문제해결 과정에서 상 수준 집단에 비해 메타정의의 출현 비율이 상대적으로 높았으며, 상 수준 집단의 메타정의는 하 수준 집단에 비해 상대적으로 다양한 유형의 메타적 기능으로 작용하였다. 이와 같은 연구 결과로부터 수학 문제해결 수업에 적용해 볼 수 있는 메타정의의 기능적 특성과 관련한 교육적 시사점을 도출하였다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집
• /
• 제36권1호
• /
• pp.139-170
• /
• 2022

수준별 수학교육과 관련하여 러시아는 우리나라보다 오랜 연구와 실천의 경험을 가지고 있다. 현재 러시아에서 사용 중인 10-11학년 수학과 교육과정은 수준별 교육과정으로 기본수준과 심화수준으로 구성되어 있으며, 기본수준과 심화수준은 다루는 최소필수내용, 학생들에게 요구되는 수준 등에서 차이를 보인다. 그리고 10-11학년의 수학교과서도 수준별 교과서이다. 본 연구에서는 러시아의 10학년 '대수와 해석의 기초'의 교과서들 중에서 같은 저자 그룹에 의해 집필된 기본수준 교과서, 심화수준 교과서를 분석 대상으로 삼았다. 심화수준 교과서에만 있는 '실수', '복소수' 단원의 내용을 조사하여 심화의 성격으로 추가된 주요 학습 내용과 교과서 기술의 특징을 분석하였다. 그리고 기본수준 교과서와 심화수준 교과서에 모두 포함된 단원인 '함수', '삼각함수', '삼각방정식', '삼각함수 식들의 변환', '도함수'에 대해서는 기본수준과 심화수준 교과서의 주요 학습 내용을 비교, 분석하였고, 두 수준의 교과서에 제시된 정의와 정리의 서술상 특징도 비교, 분석하였다.

• 대한수학회지
• /
• 제57권4호
• /
• pp.915-933
• /
• 2020

A two-level finite element method based on the Newton iterative method is proposed for solving the Navier-Stokes/Darcy model. The algorithm solves a nonlinear system on a coarse mesh H and two linearized problems of different loads on a fine mesh h = O(H^4-𝜖). Compared with the common two-grid finite element methods for the considered problem, the presented two-level method allows for larger scaling between the coarse and fine meshes. Moreover, we prove the stability and convergence of the considered two-level method. Finally, we provide numerical experiment to exhibit the effectiveness of the presented method.

• Journal of applied mathematics & informatics
• /
• 제17권1_2_3호
• /
• pp.605-614
• /
• 2005

We show that an Artinian O-sequence $h_0,h_1,{\cdots},h_{d-1},h_d\;=\;h_{d-1},h_{d+l}\;>\;h_d$ of codimension 3 is not level when $h_{d-1}\;=\;h_d\;=\;d + i\;and\;h{d+1}\;=\;d+(i+1)\;for\;i\;=\;1,\;2,\;and\;3$, which is a partial answer to the question in [9]. We also introduce an algorithm for finding noncancelable Betti numbers of minimal free resolutions of all possible Artinian O-sequences based on the theorem of Froberg and Laksov in [2].

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집
• /
• 제28권3호
• /
• pp.395-422
• /
• 2014

인문계 ${\bigcirc}{\bigcirc}$고등학교 1학년 1개 반 35명을 실험집단으로 다른 1개 반 35명을 비교집단으로 선정하였다. 실험집단은 수준별 학습지를 활용한 학급 내 수준별 TAI 협동학습 모형을 한반이고 비교집단은 일반적인 수업인 교과서 중심의 수업을 한 반이다. 본 연구에서는 고등학교 수학 수업에서 학급 내 수준별 TAI 협동학습 모형을 위해서 수준별 학습지를 개발한다. 그리고 개발한 수준별 학습지를 사용한 학급 내 수준별 TAI 협동학습 모형으로 고등학생의 학습능력을 향상시키는 것에 그 목적이 있다. 이를 위하여 연구문제를 구체적으로 다음과 같이 설정하였다. 첫째, 수준별 학습지를 사용한 학급 내 수준별 TAI 협동학습 모형으로 학업성취도를 향상시킬 수 있는가? 둘째, 수준별 학습지를 사용한 학급 내 수준별 TAI 협동학습 모형으로 수학 학습태도를 향상시킬 수 있는가? 셋째, 수준별 학습지를 사용한 학급 내 수준별 TAI 협동학습 모형에 대한 학생들의 반응은 어떠한가? 이다. 본 연구의 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 비교집단에 비하여 실험집단에서는 학업성취도가 향상되었다. 둘째, 비교집단에 비하여 실험집단에서는 수학 학습태도의 변화에 도움이 됨을 알 수 있었다. 셋째, 수준별 학습지를 사용한 학급 내 수준별 TAI 협동학습 모형에 대하여 비교집단에 비하여 실험집단에서는 의미 있는 반응을 나타냄을 알 수 있었다.