• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제28권6호
• /
• pp.7-18
• /
• 2019

This study is to find out the design concept of asymmetrical building with 4 purlins mainly in Sungkyunkwan(Confucian Shrines), Changgyeonggung palace and Changdeokgung palace The results are as follows: First, asymmetrical building with 4 purlins has the same height pillars, which was useful to control the side lenght and put a higher pillar without limit. Second, the side length of the asymmetrical building with 4 purlins is between 12 to 14 Ja[尺]. It's relatively longer than the minimum length(12 Ja) of 5 purlins architecture seen in later Joseon dynasty. Third, asymmetrical building with 4 purlins was not an anomalous structure when compared to 3 purlins and 5 purlins. It was actually a traditional style, unlike the current architectural recognition nowadays, which mainly focused on the balanced roof structure. These examples show that the architectures in Early Joseon dynasty were planned and constructed first according to the plane division that fit in a specific use or space.

• 대한건축학회논문집:계획계
• /
• 제35권11호
• /
• pp.117-128
• /
• 2019

The necessity of the Toi-Maru has increased greatly in order to enter to the building or to move conveniently in the building after the mid-Joseon period, when the combination of On-dol Ma-ru began to be universally used. According to this process, the 3-Dori type upper structure is thought to have undergone the typological changed by securing a more stable space of Toi-Maru In cases where a relatively large girder was used, it is often the case that the space is divided using a pillar to place a Toi-Maru on the front. However, it is difficult to find a case where the width of the Toi-Maru exceeds 1meter due to its structural limit. The type that made additional Toi-girder to overcome the spatial constraint of this structure and replaced the method of former typology after Mid-Jpseon period. In case of 5-Dori type, Toi-Maru installed in between high post and Toi post in early period. In these type, the width of Toi-Maru was subordinated by the location of milled Dori of roof structure and sometimes it became too excessive. 5-Dori type with Pyon-ju occurred to overcome these restriction between the width of Toi-Maru and the location of milled Dori of roof structure. Not a few remains of Mid-Jpseon period keeping the evidences of changing process of roof structure provoked by Toi-Maru installation. The consistent process of Toi-Maru installation and structural adjustment will be focused to consider the attempt to spatial requirement and architectural reaction in Mid-Joseon perid.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제15권6호
• /
• pp.3894-3906
• /
• 2014

본 연구는 정밀실측이 이루어진 국가지정문화재 중 사찰의 주불전을 대상으로 맞배지붕 건물과 합각지붕 건물로 구분하여 지붕에서 나타나는 앙곡, 안허리곡, 용마루곡과 지붕기울기를 분석하였다. 그 결과 는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 맞배지붕 건물의 앙곡과 안허리곡은 건물규모(면적), 내부 고주 유무 등과 밀접한 상관관계가 있다. 또한 5량가 구조와 7량가 구조중에 규모가 큰 7량가 구조에서 더 크게 나타났다. 둘째, 맞배지붕 건물의 앙곡과 안허리곡은 서로 상관관계가 있는데 앙곡이 큰 건물에서 안허리곡도 크게 나타난 것으로 분석되었다. 지붕기울기는 변수요인(평면요소, 입면요소, 단면요소)과는 크게 연관성이 없으며, 앙곡, 안허리곡, 용마루곡 크기는 공포의 외1출목과 외2출목에서 비슷한 크기였으나, 외3출목에서는 상대적으로 크게 나타났다. 셋째, 합각지붕 건물의 앙곡과 안허리곡은 맞배지붕 건물과는 다르게 서로 상관관계 없었는데, 전면과 측면은 서로 상관관계를 가지며 전면의 곡이 크게 나타난 건물에서는 측면에서도 크게 나타났다. 넷째, 합각지붕 건물 내부에 고주가 있는 건물은 앙곡과 안허리곡이 크게 나타난 반면, 고주가 없는 건물에서는 작게 나타났으며, 용마루곡은 건물규모와 건물높이에 밀접한 연관성이 있어, 건물이 높거나 큰 건물에서 용마루곡이 크게 나타났다. 지붕기울기는 맞배지붕 건물에서와 같이 변수요인과는 상관관계가 거의 없었다.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제32권5호
• /
• pp.51-58
• /
• 2023

This study was conducted to examine the architectural characteristics of Hak-seong Lee Family's Geun-jae-gong Historic House located in Seok-cheon-ri, Ung-chon-myeon, Ulju-gun, Ulsan. The house is said to have been rebuilt in the early 20th century after it was built in the 18th century, and now there are nine buildings left, including the An-chae, Sa-rang-chae, Sa-dang, storehouses and etc. This house is a large-scale house that is difficult to find similar cases in near region. The division of areas on each building is clear, and it is evaluated that it retains the typical characteristics of the head family in the late Joseon Dynasty in terms of its overall size and layout. In addition, the current wooden structure, which is said to have been rebuilt in the early 20th century, shows the composition method and space utilization method of the 3-Dori type upper structure, which have become more diverse since the late Joseon Dynasty. This has not been dealt with in the previous survey, and should be considered in detail through this paper.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제33권4호
• /
• pp.43-50
• /
• 2024

In-beop-dang (因法堂) is a building type that can confirm the complex space composition of the hermitage in the late Joseon Period, which is designed to accommodate various functions such as Buddhist priesthood, living spaces, and auditoriums. These facts have been confirmed mainly through plan analysis in many previous researches. However, such a plan composition has the potential to lead to more in-depth research when dealt with consideration of the Korean traditional wooden structure. In particular, the composition of upper structure in In-beop-dang with Toi-maru in front of the On-dol room can be considered from the perspective of structural response to wooden architecture in the Joseon period after the introduction of Toi-maru. Based on the achievements of these prior studies, this paper was conducted to examine the compositional characteristics, including the upper structure of the Wha-jang-am (華藏庵) In-beop-dang. In order to examine the universal aspects of structural type changes to cope with the complex spatial composition of the In-beop-dang, the cases of an in-mountain hermitage of Kim Nyong-sa(金龍寺) Temple, Geum-seon-dae (金仙臺), Yang-jin-am (養眞庵), and Dae-sung-am (大成庵).

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제31권5호
• /
• pp.35-44
• /
• 2022

Although Changgyeong-gung was devastgated by Japanease invasion in 1592, it was restored during the reign of Gwanghaegun, had remembered of early Joseon danasty's architecturural order. It was destroyed several times by fire after that but was rebuilt immedieately. There are Donggol-do and Donggol-dohyeong, so we can fine the change of architectures in Changgyeong-gung. Jibbokheon(集福軒) and Yeongchunheon(迎春軒) are marked in another location and architectures in Donggon-do and Donggon-dohyeong. The reason has been known that it was rebuilt after the fire in 1830. As a result of reviewing the record of birth of crown prince Sado and movement of coffin of King Jeong-jo in funeral ceremony, it was confirmed that notation of Jibbokheon and Yeongchunhyeon was misprinted. In particular, Yeongchunheon confirmed the possibility that the existing building was built by extending it while applying the asymmetrical building with four-purlins structure method during the reign of King Jeongjo, and that it was reconstructed by moving Yeonyeonghap when it was destroyed by fire 1830. And although now Jibbokheon and Yeongchunhyeon(延英閤) are connected, nothern part of Jibbokheon did not burn in the fire, so it was judged that original architectural plan were maintained until now. The current building north of Jibbokheon was built before 1695 (21st year of King Sukjong), which was first identified in the Gunggeolji(宮闕志), and there is a possibility that it may have been a part of Janggyeongmun(長慶門) inner corridor built before 1633. The present building north of Jibbokheon has great architectural significance in that it maintains the structural method of the early Joseon Dynasty which was often applied to buildings with a small scale of inner palace.