• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제24권1호
• /
• pp.55-66
• /
• 1999

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the microleakage of 5 current dentin bonding systems which are composed of 2 multi-bottle systems(Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, All Bond2) and 3 one-bottle systems(Single bond, One-Step, Prime & Bond). In this in vitro study, class V cavities were prepared on buccal and lingual surfaces of sixty extracted human premolars and molars on cementum margin. The experimental teeth were randomly divided into six groups of 10 samples (20 surfaces) each, Group 1 : Scotchbond Multi-Purpose ; Group 2 : All Bond 2 ; Group 3 : Single Bond ; Group 4 : One-Step ; Group 5 : Prime & Bond ; Group 6 : no bonding agent(control). The bonding agent and composite resin were applied for each group following the manufacturer's instructions. After 500 thermocycling between $5^{\circ}C$ and $55^{\circ}C$, the 60 teeth were placed in 2% Methylene blue dye for 24 hours, then rinsed with tab water. The specimen were embedded in clear resin, then sectioned buccolingually through the center of restoration with a low speed diamond saw. The dye penetration on each of the specimen were then observed with a stereomicroscope at ${\times}20$. The results of study were statistically analyzed using the Student-Newmann-Keul's Methods and the Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test. The resin/dentin interfaces were examined under Scanning Electron Microscopy. The results of this study were as follows. 1. None of the dentin bonding systems used in this study showed significant difference in leakage values at both the enamel and the dentin margins (P>0.05). 2. In all groups except the control, leakage value seen at the enamel margin was significantly lower than that seen at the dentin margin (P<0.05). 3. Compared to the control group, all the groups treated with dentin bonding systems showed significantly lower leakage value at both enamel and dentin margins (P<0.05). 4. In the SEM view, gaps were observed in the composite resin / dentin interface in group 6 where no dentin bonding agent was used, and in all the other groups (group 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) composite resin, hybrid layer, and dentin were seen to be closely adhering to each other where there were no leakages. Well-developed resin tags 3~100${\mu}m$ in length infiltrated dentinal tubules past the hybrid layer and a hybrid layer 1~5${\mu}m$ thick had developed between the dentinal surface and the composite resin surface.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제27권3호
• /
• pp.257-269
• /
• 2002

Objective : The purpose of this study was to evaluate the resin infiltration into dentin of one-bottle adhesive systems and self-etching primer bonded to Class V cavities using confocal laser scanning microscope(CLSM). Material and Methods : Forty Class V cavities were prepared from freshly extracted caries-free Human teeth. These teeth were divided into two groups based on the presence of cervical abrasion: Group I, cervical abrasion : Group II, wedge-shaped cavity preparation. Resin-dentin interfaces were produced with two one-bottle dentin bonding systems-ONE COAT BOND(OCB; Coltene$^R$) and Syntac$^R$SPrint$^{TM}$(SS; VIVADENT)-, one self-etching priming system-CLEARFIL$^{TM}$ SE BOND (SB : KURARAY)- and one multi-step dentin bonding system-Scotchbond$^{TM}$Multi-Purpose (SBMP, 3M Dental Products)-as control according to manufacturers' instructions. Cavities were restored with Spectrum$^{R}$(Dentsply). Specimens were immersed in saline for 24 hours and sectioned longitudinally with a low-speed diamond disc. The resin-dentin interfaces were microscopically observed using CLSM. The quality of resin-infiltrated dentin layers were evaluated by five dentists using 0~4 scale. Results : Confocal laser scanning microscopal investigations using primer labeled with rhodamine B showed that the penetration of the primer occurred along the cavity margins. Statistical analysis using one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan's Multiple Range test revealed that the primer penetration of the group 2(wedge-shaped cavity preparation) was more effective than group 1(cervical abrasion) and that of the gingival interfaces was more effective than the occlusal interfaces. In the one-bottle dentin bonding systems, the resin penetration score of OCB was compatible to SBMP, but those of SS and self-etching priming system, SB were lower than SBMP.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제30권3호
• /
• pp.204-214
• /
• 2005

본 연구는 상아질에 2단계와 단일 단계 자가 산부식 접착제를 적용하여 복합레진을 접착한 후 저장기간에 따른 미세 인장 결합강도와 접착계면의 변화를 상호 비교하기 위하여 시행하였다. 발거된 상 하악 대구치 48개의 교합면측 상아질을 노출시켜 12개씩 4개의 군으로 분류하였다 사용된 접착제의 종류에 따라 SE Bond 군, AdheSE 군, Adper 군, Xeno III 군으로 분류하여 접착제를 적용한 후, 동일 회사의 복합레진 을 4 mm두께로 접착시켰다. 각 군당 4개의 치아를 선택하여 증류수가 담겨진 용기에 집어넣고 37$^{\circ}C$의 항온기에 각각 1일 15일, 30일 동안 저장한 후 시편을 제작하여 각각 미세인장 결합강도의 측정과 주사전자 현미경 관찰 하여 다음과 같은 결과를 나타내었다. 2단계 자가 산부식 접착제는 1일에서 30간의 저장기간 동안 결합강도가 점차적으로 감소하였지만 통계학적으로 유의한 차이를 나타내지 않았고, 상아질과 접착제 간에 긴밀한 접착관계를 보였다. 반면에 단일 단계자가 산부식 접착제는 1일의 저장기간에 비해 30일의 저장기간에서 통계학적인 결합강도의 감소를 나타내었으며, 상아질과 접착제 간에 넓은 간극이 관찰되었다. 따라서 본 연구에서 나타난 두 종류의 30일 동안의 접착내구성은 2단계 자가 산부식 접착제가 단일 단계 자가 산부식 접착제보다 우수한 것으로 나타났다.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제33권1호
• /
• pp.9-19
• /
• 2008

본 연구의 목적은 두 가지 실험용 소수성 상아질 접착제와 전통적인 3-step 상아질 접착제의 nanoleakage 양상을 load cycling 전, 후에 비교하여 상아질 접착제의 내구성을 예측해 보고자 하는 것이다. 두 가지 실험용 소수성 상아질 접착제 즉, 에탄을 포함 상아질 접착제, 메탄을 포함 상아질 접착제를 만들었다. 대구치 30개의 치관부 3분의 1을 절단하고 임의로 3군으로 나누어 각각 Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA), 에탄올 포함 상아질 접착제 및 메탄을 포함 상아질 접착제를 사용하여 상아질 접착 후, 복합레진으로 치관부를 수복하였다. 각각의 접착 시스템을 Load cycling 여부에 따라 두 군으로 나누고 각각의 치아를 접착 계면에 수직으로, 약 2.0 mm의 두께가 되도록 절단하여 치아마다 2개의 시편을 얻어 각 군 당10개의 시편을 얻었다. 시편을 50 % ammoniacal silver nitrate를 이용하여 염색한 후 주사전자현미경을 이용하여 혼성층의 nanoleakage를 관찰하였다. 은 침착의 분포는 image analysis software (Scion Image Beta 4.03, Scion Corp., Frederick, MD, USA)를 이용하여 gray value로 계산하였고 이 원분산 분석법으로 통계처리 하였다. 3종의 상아질 접착제에서 모두 nanoleakage가 관찰되었으나, 에탄올 포함 상아질 접착제와 메탄을 포함 상아질 접착제에서 Scotchbond Multi-Purpose 보다 적은 양의 nanoleakage 가 관찰되었다 (p < .0001). 각각의 상아질 접착제에서 load cycling에 따른 nanoleakage 양상의 변화는 관찰되지 않았다. 이상의 결과에서 친수성기를 줄이고 소수성기를 극대화 한 실험용 상아질 접착제가 접착 계면의 내구성 향상에 도움을 줄 수 있을 것으로 사료된다.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제24권2호
• /
• pp.310-321
• /
• 1999

In this in vitro study, confocal laser scanning microscopic morphology of dentin-resin interface and its relationship to shear bond strength were investigated after the exposed dentin surfaces were treated with 3 different kinds of dentin adhesive systems[three-step; Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus(SMPP), self-priming bonding resin; Single Bond(SB), self-etching primer; Clearfil Liner Bond 2(LB2)]. 52 extracted human molar teeth without caries and/or restorations. The experimental teeth were randomly divided into three groups of seventeen teeth each. In five teeth of each group, class V cavities(depth: 1.5mm) with 900 cavosurface angles were prepared at the cementoenamel junction on buccal and lingual surfaces. Bonding resins of each dentin adhesive system were mixed with rhodamine B. Primer of SMPP was mixed with fluorescein. In group 1. the exposed dentin was conditioned with etchant, applied with above primer and bonding resin of SMPP. In group 2, with etchant and self-priming bonding agent of SB. In group 3, with self-etching primer and bonding agent of LB2. After treatment with dentin adhesive systems, composite resin were applied and photocured. The experimental teeth were cut longitudinally through the center line of restoration and grounded so that about $90{\mu}m$-thick wafers of buccolingually orientated dentin were obtained. And, $70{\sim}80{\mu}m$-thick wafers sectioned horizontally, thus presenting a dentinal tubules at 900 to the cut surface of a remaining tooth, were obtained. Primer of SMPP mixed with rhodamine B was applied to these wafers. Confocal laser scanning microscopic investigations of these wafers were done within of 24 hours after treatment. To measure shear bond strength, the remaining twelve teeth of each group were grounded horizontally below the dentinoenamel junction, so that no enamel remained. After applying dentin adhesive systems on the dentin surface, composite was applied in the shape of cylinder. The cylinder was 5mm in diameter, and 2mm in thickness. Shear bond strength was measured using Instron with a cross-head speed of 0.5mm/min. It was concluded as follows ; 1. Hybrid layer of SMPP(mean: $4.56{\mu}m$) was thicker than that of any other groups. This value was not statistically significant thicker than that of SB(mean: $3.41{\mu}m$, p>0.05), and significant thicker than that of LB2(mean: $1.56{\mu}m$, p<0.05). There was a statistical difference between SB and LB2(p<0.05). 2. Although there were variations in the length of resin tag even in a sample, and in a group, most samples in SMPP and SB showed resin tags extending above $20{\mu}m$. But samples in LB2 showed resin tags of $10{\mu}m$ at best. 3. Besides primer's infiltration into demineralized peritubular dentin and dentinal tubules, fluorophore of primer was detected in the lateral branches of dentinal tubules. 4. All groups demonstrated statistically significant differences from one another(p<0.05), with shear bond strengths given in descending order as follows: SMPP(18.3MPa), SB(16.0MPa) and LB2(12.4MPa). 5. LB2 having thinnest hybrid layer($1.56{\mu}m$) showed the lowest shear bond strength(12.4MPa).

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제46권5호
• /
• pp.511-519
• /
• 2008

연구목적: 본 연구의 목적은 자가중합 또는 이중중합을 위한 활성제가 포함된 상아질 접착제에서 활성제의 사용 유무가 자가중합 복합레진과 상아질 접착제간의 전단결합강도에 미치는 영향을 평가하는 것이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 실험을 위하여 우식 및 충전물이 없는 건전한 대구치 50개를 주문제작한 아크릴릭 레진블록에 포매한 후, 모델 트리머로 연마하여 평활한 상아질면을 만든 후, 600grit 실리콘 카바이드 페이퍼로 연마하고 증류수에 보관하였다. 50개의 시편을 10개씩 5개 군으로 나눈 후, 상아질 접착제를 제조사의 지시대로 도포한 후, 플라스틱 주형을 이용하여 자가중합 복합레진 (Luxacore)을 접착시켰다. 상아질 접착제는 One-Step (OS군), Prime&Bond NT, AdheSE를 이용하였는데 Prime&Bond NT와 AdheSE는 단독으로 사용한 군 (PB군, AS군)과 활성제를 같이 사용한 군 (PBA군, ASA군)으로 다시 나누었다. 증류수에 24시간 보관 후, 인스트론 만능시험기를 사용하여 시편에 1 mm/min의 전단속도로 하중을 가하여 시편이 분리되는 최대 하중을 측정한 뒤, 단위 면적 당 결합강도 (MPa)로 환산하여 One-way ANOVA를 이용하여 비교, 분석하고 5% 유의수준에서 Tukey HSD 검정을 이용하여 분석하였다. 결과: 각 군의 전단결합강도의 평균을 보면, OS군이 18.6 MPa로 가장 높았고 그 다음이 PBA군 (10.3 MPa)과 ASA군 (10.2 MPa)이었고, PB군과 AS군이 각각 5.9 MPa, 6.0 MPa로 가장 낮은 전단결합강도를 나타내었다. 결론: 본 실험을 통해 Prime&Bond NT와 AdheSE에서 활성제를 같이 사용한 경우, 활성제를 사용하지 않은 경우보다 전단결합강도가 높아짐을 알 수 있었지만, 활성제가 포함되어 있지 않은 One-Step보다는 낮은 수치였다.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제33권2호
• /
• pp.125-132
• /
• 2008

이 연구의 목적은 서로 다른 접착제들로 수리된 복합 레진의 전단 결합 강도를 비교하고, 접착 시스템이 복합레진의 수리 강도에 미치는 영향을 평가하기 위한 것이다. 40개의 복합 레진 시편 (Z-250)을 준비하였으며, 1주일 동안 열순환을 시행한 후, $50\;{\mu}m$ 알루미나 입자로 샌드 블라스팅 하였다. 이 시편들을 네 개의 그룹으로 나누었으며 (n = 10), 다음과 같은 서로 다른 종류의 접착제를 각각 적용하였다; SB 그룹 : Scotchbond multipurpose ; SE 그룹 : Clearfil SE bond ; XP 그룹 : XP bond ; XE 그룹 : Xeno III. 접착 과정을 완료한 후에, 새로운 레진 (Z-250, 3M ESPE)을 몰드에 적용하여, 광조사 하였다. 대조군으로, 접착 과정 없이 10개의 시편을 준비하였다. 7일 동안 열순환을 시행한 후 전단 결합 강도를 측정하였고, 파절 양상을 조사하였으며, 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. 기존 복합 레진과 수리용 복합 레진 사이의 전단 결합 강도는 접착제 종류에 따른 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 2. 재료의 응집 강도 (대조군)와 수리한 결합 강도 (실험군) 사이에 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 3. 파절 양상은 대부분 응집성 파절 또는 혼합 파절을 보였다.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제27권3호
• /
• pp.299-309
• /
• 2002

The purposes of this study were to evaluate the microtensile bond strength of one-step adhesives accord ing to various dentin surface treatments and to observe the interface between resin(Z-100$^{TM}$) and dentin under SEM. In this study forty-five non-caries extracted human molars and three adhesive systems were used ; AlI-Bond 2(AB), One-Up Bond F(OU), AQ-Bond(AQ). ; In Group 1, 2, 3, AB was used and tooth surfaces were treated by smearing(S), ultrasonic cleansing(US), etching(E) respectively. In Group 4. 5, 6, One-Up Bond F was used and tooth surfaces were also treated as the same way above. In Groups 7, 8, 9, AQ Bond was used and tooth surfaces wet$.$e treated as the same way. Each specimen was prepared for microtensile bond testing, and were stored for 24hrs in 37$^{\circ}C$ distilled water. After that, microtensile bond strength for each specimen was measured. Specimens were fabricated to examine the failure patterns of interface between resin and dentin and observed under the SEM. The results were as follows ; 1. The results(mean$\pm$SD) of microtensile test were group 1, 25.69$\pm$4.31MPa; group 2, 40.93$\pm$10.94MPa; group 3, 47.65$\pm$8.85MPa； group 4, 35.98$\pm$9.14MPa； group 5, 39.66$\pm$8.45MPa; group 6, 43.26$\pm$13.01MPa; group 7, 25.07$\pm$4.2MPa；group 8, 30.4$\pm$4.74MPa；group 9, 33.61$\pm$7.88MPa. 2. One-Up Bond F was showed the highest value of 36.98$\pm$9.14MPa in dentin surface treatment with smearing, and there were significant differences to the other groups (p<0.05). 3. All-Bond 2 was showed the highest value of 40.93$\pm$10.94MPa in dentin surface treatment with ultra-sonic cleansing, but was no significant difference to One-Up Bond F(p>0.05) 4. All-Bond 2 was showed the highest value of 47.65$\pm$8.85MPa in dentin surface treatment with etch ing(10%phosphoric acid), and there were significant differences to the other groups(p<0.05). 5. All-Bond 2 was showed the highest value of 47.65$\pm$8.85MPa in dentin surface treatment according to manufacture's directions. but was no significant difference to One-Up Bond F(p>0.05). 6. AQ Bond was skewed the lowest microtensile bond strength with various dentin surface treatment, and the were significant differences to the other groups(p<0.05).

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제25권2호
• /
• pp.243-253
• /
• 2000

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate dentin bonding by two different dentin bonding systems(DBS) using acetone based primer or adhesive [All Bond 2(AB2), One Step(OS)] when they were applied by wet or dry bonding technique. Morphology of resin-dentin interface and hybrid layer thickness(HLT) were investigated using Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope(CLSM) and compared to shear bond strength(SBS). 72 extracted sound human molars were randomly divided into 4 groups of 18 teeth each - Group 1.(AW); AB2 by wet bonding. Group 2(AD); AB2 by dry bonding. Group 3.(OW); OS by wet bonding, Group 4.(OD); OS by dry bonding. In 6 teeth of each group, notch-shaped class V cavities(depth 2mm) were prepared on buccal and lingual surface at the cementoenamel juction(12 cavities per group). To obtain color contrast in CLSM observation, bonding resins of each DBS were mixed with rhodamine B and primer of AB2 was mixed with sodium fluorescein. Prepared teeth of each group were treated with AB2, OS, respectively according to the manufacturer's instructions except for dentin surface moisture treatment after acid etching. In group 1 and 3, after acid etching, excess water was removed with wet tissue(Kimwipes), leaving consistently shiny, visibly hydrated dentin surface. In group 2 and 4, dentin surface was dried for 10 seconds at 1 inch distance. The treated teeth were then packed with composite resin(${\AE}$litefil) and light-cured. 12 microscopic samples($60{\sim}80{\mu}m$ thickness) of each group were obtained after longitudinal section and grinding(Exakt cutting and grinding system). Morphological investigation of resin-dentin interface and HLT measurement using CLSM were done. For measurement of SBS, remaining 12 teeth of each group were flattened occlusally to remove all enamel and grinded to 500 grit SiC(Pedemet Specimen Preparation Equipment). After applying DBS on the exposed dentin surface, composite resin was applied in the shape of cylinder, which has 5mm diameter, 1.5mm thickness, and light cured. SBS was measured using Instron with a crosshead speed of 0.5mm/min. It was concluded as follows, 1. HLT of AW(mean: $2.59{\mu}m$) was thicker than any other group, and followed by AD, OW, OD in descending order(mean; 2.37, 2.28, $1.92{\mu}m$). Only OD had statistically significant differences(p<0.05) to AW and AD. 2. There were intimate contact of resin and dentin at the interface in wet bonding groups, but gaps or irregular interfaces were observed in dry bonding groups. 3. The length, diameter, density of resin tags were various even in the same group without significant differences between groups and lots of adhesive lateral branches were observed. 4. There were no statistically significant difference of SBS between AB2 and OS, but SBS of wet bonding groups were significantly higher(p<0.05) than dry bonding groups. 5. There were no consistent relationships between HLT and SBS.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제36권5호
• /
• pp.409-418
• /
• 2011

연구목적: 이 연구는 상아질 표면에 Er:YAG 레이저를 조사하지 않는 군, 레이저를 조사한 군, 레이저를 조사한 후 부가적인 산처리를 한 군으로 분류하여 2단계 단일병 전부식 접착시스템과 자가부식 프라이머 접착시스템을 이용하여 복합레진을 접착하였을 때 이러한 표면처리가 복합레진의 미세전단 결합강도와 결합계면에 미치는 영향을 비교하기 위하여 시행하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 32개의 발거된 대구치의 교합면측 상아질을 이용하였고, 상아질의 표면처리는 1군과 4군에서 각각 인산과 자가부식 프라이머로 하였으며, 2군과 5군은 Er:YAG 레이저로 에칭처리하였고, 3군과 6군은 레이저로 에칭한 후 다시 각각 인산과 자가부식 프라이머로 하였다. 1군, 2군, 3군은 Single Bond 2와 Z 250 (3M ESPE)을 이용하였고, 4군, 5군, 6군은 Clearfil SE Bond와 Clearfil AP-Z (Kuraray)을 이용하여 상아질 면에 Tygon tube를 접착하였다. 각 군의 미세전단 결합강도를 측정한 후 통계 처리하였고, 또한 6개의 시편에서 복합레진과 상아질 계면을 주사전자현미경하에서 관찰하였다. 결과: Single Bond 2를 사용한 군에서 2군의 결합강도는 1군과 3군보다 통계학적으로 낮게 나타났으며, Clearfil SE Bond를 사용한 군에서 4군, 5군, 6군의 결합강도는 각각 통계학적으로 유의한 차이를 나타내었다(p < 0.05). 2군과 5군은 아주 짧고 가는 레진테그가 관찰되었고, 3군과 6군은 길고 가는 레진테그와 레진테그의 측지가 관찰되었다. 결론: 레이저로 에칭 처리한 상아질에 대한 부가적인 산 처리나 자가부식 프라이머의 처리는 상아질의 접착력을 향상시켰다.