• Title/Summary/Keyword: 환경갈등

Search Result 576, Processing Time 0.027 seconds

A Qualitative Case Study on Conflict Transfer Factors of College Graduates with Early Careers (대졸초기경력자의 갈등 전이 요인에 대한 질적 사례 연구)

  • Choi, Min-Seo;Park, Si-Yeon
    • The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
    • /
    • v.19 no.5
    • /
    • pp.484-496
    • /
    • 2019
  • The purpose of this study is to identify the factors influencing conflict transition through the conflict transition process experienced by college graduates with early careers. The participants of this study were in-depth interviews with a total of 8 young people aged 25-34 who graduated from college and found their common subjects in all cases. As a result, the topics such as 'lack of recognition and compensation', 'unfairness of supervisor', 'characteristics of job (interdependence, autonomy)' were derived. 'Lack of recognition and compensation' brought about a sense of skepticism about the idea that even though they worked hard, they could not be recognized. And it caused a conflict transition. When the participants felt the 'unfairness of the supervisor', the task conflicts were further amplified and it transfer to relationship conflict. Among the characteristics of 'job characteristics', when highly interdependent occupations were carried out, conflict transition was shown and conflict levels were high. On the other hand, the work environment with job autonomy showed job satisfaction and did not show conflict transition. This study has an academic significance in that it revealed the types of conflicts and conflict transfer factors experienced in early career status of college graduates. In addition, this research have the practical implications to improves the participants' understanding of the conflict transfer through actual scene in the workplace.

How perceptions of inter-party conflict influence partisan affect: The moderating role of party identification (당파적 편향에 따른 책임 귀속: 여야간 갈등인식과 정당 호감도를 중심으로)

  • Gil, Jung-ah;Ha, Shang E.
    • Korean Journal of Legislative Studies
    • /
    • v.25 no.1
    • /
    • pp.45-78
    • /
    • 2019
  • This study examines the relationship between individuals' perceptions on party conflict and affective polarization. It pays particular attention to party identification as a moderating variable. Using a survey conducted in the context of the 2014 Korean local election, the present study hypothesizes that perceiving serious inter-party conflict in the political arena is likely to increase negative feelings toward out-group political party among partisans only. Not only do the results confirm our hypothesis but suggest that conflict perception leads to affective polarization among partisan voters. This paper contributes to our understanding of the mechanism that links the attribution of blame to out-group political party for legislative gridlock with ever-growing affective polarization of the electorate.