• KDI Journal of Economic Policy
• /
• v.16 no.1
• /
• pp.217-250
• /
• 1994

21세기까지 기술선진국(技術先進國)에 진입(進入)하기를 원하는 한국경제는 향후(向後) 기술(技術) 및 시장(市場) 불확실성(不確實性)이 큰 핵심기반기술(核心基盤技術)의 자립도(自立度)를 높여 나가야 할 입장에 있다. 네트워크의 활용(活用)은 이와 같은 기술 및 시장불확실성을 극복하는 유용한 방법일 뿐 아니라 WTO라는 새로운 교역질서하에서 더욱 중요해지는 기술정책(技術政策)의 주요수단(主要手段)이다. 본고(本稿)는 기술혁신네트워크를 통한 기술의 창출(創出) 및 확산과정(擴散過程)에 유의하면서 한국 기술혁신시스템을 장기전망(長期展望)하고 산업계(産業界), 학계(學界), 연구계(硏究界) 및 정부의 장기기술발전전략(長期技術發展戰略)을 도출하고 있다. 장기발전전략에 기반한 기술정책(技術政策)의 당면과제(當面課題)는 대학(大學), 공공연구기관(公共硏究機關), 중소기업(中小企業)의 기술혁신 기여도 향상을 위한 개혁과 제도개선으로 요약된다. 왜냐하면 국내의 연구기관, 대학, 중소기업 등의 기술적 기여가 부진하면 기업내(企業內) 세계분업(世界分業)을 전개하는 대기업(大企業)의 혁신활동이 국내경제(國內經濟)와 유리(遊離)되어 전개될 수 있기 때문이다. 대기업들이 해외연구개발거점(海外硏究開發據點)을 통하여 해외 연구자원을 활용하고 해외생산거점(海外生産據點)에서 생산된 소재, 부품의 역수입을 증대하는 전략에만 주력하게 되면 국내에 지식집약적(知識集約的)인 산업활동(産業活動)의 집적(集積)이 지연(遲延)된다.

• Journal of Advanced Navigation Technology
• /
• v.13 no.6
• /
• pp.998-1010
• /
• 2009

Open Innovation is expanding worldwide as a new paradigm for technology development strategy to maximize return on investment of R&D according to recent change in knowledge environment. Although the interest in Open Innovation is increasing in domestic ground, the actual circumstance of domestic research and study regarding Open Innovation are insufficient. This study on case indicates what types of preparation and consideration are needed to enforce Open Innovation as a means of important technology development strategy through certain processes, which are applied to a new product in terms of management of technology.

• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 2015.11a
• /
• pp.418-422
• /
• 2015

• Korea Logistics Conference
• /
• v.14 no.3
• /
• pp.161-180
• /
• 2006

• Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship
• /
• v.14 no.4
• /
• pp.75-89
• /
• 2019

In the case of SMEs, entrepreneurship that organizes only core functions with the minimum number of people is increasing, and a responsibility management system focusing on core functions is emphasized, so that the interest in innovation behavior and survival strategy of enterprises is getting bigger. However, in the case of SMEs, it is not easy to pursue continuous innovation due to lack of capital and lack of professional manpower. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of SME on innovation behavior by selecting exploratory study and literature study for SMEs. The data for this study were 545 out of the total 600 copies distributed to employees in SMEs. The data were analyzed using SPSS 21.0 and amos18.0. First, product diversification, strategy formulation, and R & D have a significant effect on innovation behavior, and market diversification has no effect on innovation behavior. Second, working variables such as product diversification, market diversification, strategy formulation, and R & D do not control the influence of innovative behavior on innovation behavior. Third, the rank variable, which is the controlling variable, controls the magnitude of the effect of product diversification, market diversification, strategy formulation, and R & D on innovation behavior. As a result, corporate managers should lead the organization in order to promote product diversification, market diversification strategy, R & D and innovation activities. After discussing the conclusions and implications of this study, this study presented the direction of the research for the follow-up study.

• 열린충남
• /
• s.57
• /
• pp.6-10
• /
• 2012

• Information and Communications Magazine
• /
• v.22 no.1
• /
• pp.23-34
• /
• 2005

• The tire
• /
• s.213
• /
• pp.3-15
• /
• 2002

• Korea Logistics Conference
• /
• v.11 no.3
• /
• pp.187-206
• /
• 2003

• Journal of the Korean hospital association
• /
• v.25 no.5 s.234
• /
• pp.25-36
• /
• 1996