• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.13 no.1
• /
• pp.175-185
• /
• 2013

The judgement which is subject of research has denied legal rescission of division of the inherited property by agreement based on (1) the fact that the division of inherited property terminated at the time of concluding mutual agreement in its nature while only the relationship of claim and obligation between the inheritor who has paid for such obligation and the inheritor who has acquired such obligation in the mutual agreement remains (2) and the fact that the legal stability is considerably hindered as the re-partition of inherited property having retroactive effect becomes unavoidable in case of approving the legal rescission of the division of the inherited property by agreement. But it is reasonable to also approve legal rescission on the division of the inherited property by agreement in case the division by agreement actually has the nature such as conditional donation between joint heirs (1) from the fact that the division of the inherited property by agreement gets the nature of disposal equivalent to exchange, transfer and abandonment of share between joint heirs in actuality, (2) and the fact that there are no other theories in approving the validity of mutually agreed rescission despite the fact that the re-partition of inherited property having retroactive effect is unavoidable even in case of the mutually agreed rescission of the division by agreement among all joint heirs. However, as the division of the inherited property by agreement is a contract that gets concluded only if all joint heirs participate, even the legal rescission for the reason of not fulfilling the obligations paid by one party of the heirs during the division by agreement must be considered as possible only by expression of intentions from all other joint heirs excluding this one party.

• Proceedings of the Korean Nuclear Society Conference
• /
• 1998.05b
• /
• pp.1000-1005
• /
• 1998

미국이 1985년부터 시작된 중국에 대한 원자력 수출 금지를 1998년 3월 해제함에 따라 방대한 중국의 원전시장에 미국 원자력 산업체들이 진출할 수 있게 되었다. 미국은 중국과의 원자력 협력이 핵비확산 측면에서나 상업적 이익 측면에서 미국에게 유리하다는 판단을 내렸고, 중국도 미국의 원자력 기술 및 재원이 필요해서 양국이 합의에 도달한 것으로 보인다. 중국에 대한 원자력 수출은 이제 정치적 차원의 문제에서 상업적 차원의 문제로 변환됐다고 할 수 있다. 미국의 중국에 대한 원자력 수출 금지 해제는 미국산 기술에 근거한 우리나라의 경수로 관련 대 중국 수출을 가능케 함으로써 향후 우리나라의 원자력 수출 활성화에 기여할 것이다.

• Vending industry
• /
• v.5 no.3 s.15
• /
• pp.35-41
• /
• 2005

자판기 표준약관이 개정된다. 그간 공정거래위원회 약관제도과와 우리 협회에서는 자판기 거래 분쟁 최소화를 위해 기존 약관을 개정키고 합의하고 새로운 표준약관 마련 직업을 진행해 왔다. 새로운 약관을 준비하며 상호간 쟁점이 되는 사항들이 있었지만 절충에 절충을 거쳐 개정안을 도출해 냈다. 이번에 마련된 표준약관 개정안은 그간 자판기 부실판매의 주된 사례로 작용했던 임대를 전제로 한 기망판매 행위, 수익성 보장을 전제로 반품을 할 수 있도록 유인하여 판매하는 행위 등을 금지될 수 있도록 계약해제 요건을 구체화했다. 또한 구매자가 자판기 구입 후 3개월 이내에는 일정 손율을 지불하고 임의해지를 할 수 있도록 했다. 자판기 구매자 보호 요건들을 강화했음은 물론 거래관계를 명확히 해 상호 분쟁의 요소를 최소화한 것이 특징이다. 이 같은 내용을 골자로 하는 자판기 표준안은 공정거래 위원회 약관 심사 자문회의를 거쳐 1차 승인이 났고, 마지막으로 심의 위원회 최종승인만을 남겨놓고 있다. 하지만 자판기 유통시장 정화에 대한 강력한 의지를 반영한 개정안이기 때문에 별다른 수정 없이 승인이 날 것으로 보여 진다. 이럴 경우 자판 산업계에서는 다가오는 2006년부터는 새로운 약관을 사용할 수 있게 된다. 금호에서는 새롭게 개정되는 자판기 표준 약관의 세부내용을 살펴보고, 자판기 산업계가 어떻게 이를 받아들여야 할지를 살펴봤다.

• International Commerce and Information Review
• /
• v.14 no.3
• /
• pp.231-251
• /
• 2012

The remedies available to a seller that has suffered a breach of contract by the buyer are addressed in Section III of Chapter III of Part III. The first provision in the section, 61, catalogues those remedies and authorizes an aggrieved seller to resort to them. The remaining provisions of the section address particular remedies or prerequisites to remedies. The subject matter of the current section remedies for breach of contract by the buyer obviously parallels that of Section III of Chapter II of Part III remedies for breach of contract by the seller. Many individual provisions within these sections form matched pairs. Thus 61, which catalogs the seller's remedies, which catalogs the buyer's remedies. Other provisions in the current section that have analogues in the section on buyer's remedies include 62, seller's right to require buyer's performance 63, seller's right to fix an additional period for buyer to perform and 64, seller right to avoid the contract. As was the case with the provisions on buyers' remedies, the articles governing sellers' remedies operate in conjunction with a variety of provisions outside the current section. Thus the seller's right to require performance by the buyer is subject to the rule in 28 relieving a court from the obligation to order specific performance in circumstances in which it would not do so under its own law. The authorization in 61 for a seller to claim damages for a buyer's breach operates in connection with 74-76, which specify how damages are to be measured. 49, stating when an aggrieved seller can avoid the contract, is part of a network of provisions that address avoidance, including the definition of fundamental breach, the requirement of notice of avoidance, provisions governing avoidance in certain special circumstances, measures of damages available only if the contract has been avoided and the provisions of Section V of Part III, Chapter V on effects of avoidance.

• Journal of Soil and Groundwater Environment
• /
• v.10 no.5
• /
• pp.1-10
• /
• 2005

Policies of the United States, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Germany and Denmark were compared and analyzed on risk assessment of contaminated sites. These countries were chosen from a feasible preliminary analysis of 18 countries of the European Union and the U. S. All the countries selected met two major criteria : I) implementation of risk assessment to determine the soil contamination and remediation targets of contaminated sites, ii) use of soil guidance values and risk assessment as complementary measures to determine soil contamination. Suggested policy improvements to Korea regarding these issues include i) legislation of a rational risk assessment methodology of contaminated sites, and ii) enactment of collaboration of risk assessment with the soil guidance values. To establish effective risk assessment legislation, additional in-depth research on social, economic and long-term effects of the proposed risk assessment methodologies, as well as the mutual consent of all parties including academia, industry, and administration will be necessary. Linking risk assessment with soil guidance values would be applicable to a site contaminated where the contaminant concentration exceeds a certain soil guidance value. In parallel, application of risk assessment to a site where a contaminant concentration is naturally different such as mining sites would be plausible. The policy suggestions above are not yet conclusive due to a lack of policy implementation, and simulation. Thus, additional research on developing risk assessment methodology is needed. Nevertheless, initiation of the suggested policy would increase the efficacy of Korean policy regarding the survey and remediation of contaminated sites.

• Korea Trade Review
• /
• v.48 no.3
• /
• pp.23-41
• /
• 2023

The seller and the buyer write down the agreed details in the trade contract as trade contract clauses. In the case where a letter of credit is agreed to be the payment condition, the buyer shall open a letter of credit to the seller with the shipping date specified in the trade contract through its bank. In this case, the legal relationship between the performance date of the trade contract and the shipment date of the letter of credit, the change of the performance date of the trade contract due to the change of the trade contract and the change of the shipment date specified in the letter of credit, the seller's letter of credit A problem arises in the legal interpretation of the approval period and the change request period. Therefore, this paper analyzed the precedents of the Seongnam Branch of the Suwon District Court and the Seoul High Court related to these legal issues. The performance date of a trade contract is the seller's delivery date and the buyer's payment date. In the letter of credit transaction, the date of performance of the trade contract is regarded as the date of shipment and the date of negotiation of documents specified in the letter of credit. The seller must decide whether to accept the letter of credit within 5 banking days after receiving the letter of credit from the buyer. After this period has elapsed, the seller cannot refuse the letter of credit. However, if the buyer is unable to decide whether to accept the letter of credit within 5 banking days due to reasons attributable to the buyer, the delivery date specified in the letter of credit will be extended. If the seller requests an amendment to the letter of credit, the buyer must accept it and open the letter of credit the seller desires to the seller. If the buyer refuses the seller's request to change the letter of credit, company A has the obligation to change and reopen the letter of credit as requested by company B. Expect by agreeing on the quotation As it is a fundamental breach of contract stipulated in Article 25 of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, company B can cancel the trade contract and claim damages from company A. Compensation for damages caused by Company A's breach of the trade contract shall be an amount equal to the loss suffered by Company B as a result of the breach, including loss of profits.