• The Southeast Asian review
• /
• v.27 no.4
• /
• pp.41-76
• /
• 2017

This paper analyses the market shares and the export similarity indexes (ESI) of Korea, Japan and China in ASEAN, and then identifies the determinants of Korea's exports to ASEAN countries using single equation cointegration approaches, such as fully modified OLS (FMOLS), dynamic OLS (DOLS), and canonical cointegration regression (CCR). Various regression results are as follows: As expected, Korea's real exports tend to increase as importing country's GDP grows. The competing third country's currency depreciation affects Korea's exports differently from country to country. Most notably, it doesn't significantly affect Korean exports in Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand. These results suggest that bilateral or third country exchange rates are not that important or decisive factors to determine Korea's exports to ASEAN countries in the long-run while economic growth in ASEAN countries matters most.

• 발명특허
• /
• v.36 no.12
• /
• pp.67-70
• /
• 2011

특허청 '11년 계획에 ASEAN+3(한 중 일)을 언급하였으나 구체적인 실행 계획은 미흡한 상태이다. ASEAN은 동남아시아 경제협의체로서 우리나라와 지리적 무역 측면에 있어서 매우 가까우며, 회원국 대부분이 과학기술을 개발할 수 있는 최소한의 인프라가 갖추어져 있고 정부의 의지도 뚜렷한 편이다. 주요 협력 대상국으로 말레이시아('08년 2,086건 등록) 필리핀('08년 838건 등록), 태국('08년 966건 등록)을 선정하였다.

• Korea Trade Review
• /
• v.43 no.3
• /
• pp.199-218
• /
• 2018

The force majeure in the international sale of goods has been widely used regarding liability and settlement of disputes in the event of breach of contract due to circumstances beyond the control of the parties. The purpose of this study is to examine the judgment criteria and cases concerning on force majeure in the application of FTA preferential tariffs. In order to achieve this purpose, this paper uses a literature review and case analysis on exceptional circumstances under the Korea·ASEAN FTA and the Korea·EU FTA. This study, this paper provides several implications for companies seeking preferential tariffs regarding the Korea·ASEAN FTA and the Korea·EU FTA. Korean companies are subject to the following: confirm the denial article of FTA preferential tariffs stipulated in the Korea·ASEAN FTA and the Korea·EU FTA, consider the judgment criteria on exceptional circumstances of customs authorities, confirm the extension criteria on the validity period of certificate of origin, confirm the reply criteria of verification result of the customs authorities of the exporting country, and confirm the violation of the principle of good faith for unrequested action on reply of verification result of customs authorities.

• The Journal of the Institute of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication
• /
• v.20 no.4
• /
• pp.23-33
• /
• 2020

The purpose of this study was to find ways to co-produce ASEAN-Korea co-production in the ASEAN market, which is the market that we should strategically converge in the domestic and overseas environment of the Korean content industry. The research content to achieve the research objective was targeted at viewers of broadcasting programs from five ASEAN countries, and the survey methods were conducted for case-research analysis. First, we analyzed the current status of Korean content broadcasting in five ASEAN countries during the first half of 2018, secondly, the status of use and awareness of Korean broadcasting programs in the five ASEAN countries, fourth, use and awareness of joint broadcasting programs with Korea, and finally, international joint production cases with Korea in the five ASEAN countries. Through this ideal, it is worth suggesting that the Korea-ASEAN joint production should strategically converge under the domestic and international environments currently facing the Korean content industry.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering
• /
• v.26 no.12
• /
• pp.1908-1918
• /
• 2022

Recently, ASEAN is not only a new production base but also a consumer market for Korea, and interest in the utilization of production networks in each region is increasing. In particular, urbanization in ASEAN countries is progressing at a relatively fast pace. Each country is promoting smart city projects combined with ICT to improve outdated basic infrastructure facilities such as housing, transportation, logistics, crime prevention, and disaster prevention. The purpose of this study is to develop a web-based smart city export HUB platform so that companies with excellent domestic smart city solutions can participate in smart city construction through networks with ASEAN countries. These platforms can secure the demand for smart city construction in ASEAN countries, and through the establishment of the Korea-ASEAN public-private network, smart cities planned in ASEAN countries can be promoted more innovative. In addition, it is expected to be positioned as a Global smart city platform model by applying to real cities through collaboration with excellent domestic companies.

• Korea Trade Review
• /
• v.43 no.1
• /
• pp.153-176
• /
• 2018

Since entering into force on June 1st, 2007, the Korea·ASEAN FTA has had great strategic importance as it represents a massive export market for Korea. For more than 10 years since its implementation, the trade in both goods and services have greatly increased, and ASEAN has become the second largest export market for Korea. However, Korea's FTA utilization rate for exports is approximately 46%, which is far lower than the average rate of 72% for all FTAs, despite several revisions. In this study, we investigate the problems causing this low rate of FTA utilization for export by analyzing import clearance disputes faced by the counterpart. Our recommended countermeasures for such disputes are : Since form requirements for C/O (certificate of origin) are important considerations for ASEAN countries, C/O needs to be written accurately. Understanding of the administrative system and regulative procedures of ASEAN countries is also necessary. Accurate HS code of importing countries must be obtained. Korean government authorities should make diplomatic effort to ease the import clearance procedures in counterpart countries and contact customs offices to facilitate communication.

• Korean Business Review
• /
• v.15
• /
• pp.115-131
• /
• 2002

In Korea's point of view the ASEAN is geographically located near to Korea's peninsula and can supply Korea with IT products safely, it is also a significant market that we can effectively export IT products. This study analyzes ASEAN as a. strategic market, by enlarging the IT export and import, Korea's IT market excessively leaning upon the United States and Japan's market, so ASEAN is the proper market to which we can drive multilateral trade of IT market and multikinded trade of goods. In order to enhance exports of various IT products, we have to retain a good reputation and to remove revolting factors. Also, the marketing of Korea's IT export against ASEAN have to reinforce and to activate the direct investment, plant exports, and loan credit. Therefore, this study reviews Korea's IT Industry analysis to ASEAN, and finally we suggest the way to solve the main problems.

• The Southeast Asian review
• /
• v.24 no.2
• /
• pp.1-33
• /
• 2014

아세안은 한중일과의 무역을 통한 경제적 연계의 심화현상과 최근 글로벌 위기로 인한 경기침체를 고려하여 새로운 경제성장추진을 위해 동북아의 한중일 삼국과의 무역자유화를 적극 추진하고 있다. 이미 ASEAN-중국, ASEAN-일본, ASEAN-한국 양자간 자유무역협정(FTA)이 발효되어 실행되고 있으며, 이들 3개 양자협정을 아우르는 A+3FTA(ASEAN+중국+일본+한국) 논의도 진행중이다. 이에 본 연구는 이들 4개 자유무역협정의 경제적 효과를 분석하여 과연 A+3FTA가 아세안은 물론 동아시아 역내에서 보다 바람직한 통상정책인지를 평가한다. 본 논문의 정성적 평가는 기존의 경제통합의 경제적 효과를 결정하는 이론에 근거하여 참여국의 제반 경제적 현황(경제규모, 소득수준, 경제개발수준, 거래비용, 무역 및 산업구조, 관세율 등)을 통계적으로 비교 분석한다. 한편 정량적 평가는 무역의 경제적 파급효과 분석에 널리 이용되고 있는 연산가능한 일반균형모형(CGE)분석방법을 적용한다. 정태적 효과의 분석을 위해서 GTAP 모형을 이용하며, 이와 더불어 동태적으로 투자를 통한 자본축적을 반영하는 자본축적 CGE 모형분석을 병행한다. 분석결과 후생 및 생산확대 측면에서 아세안의 경우 일본과의 양자간 FTA가 한국이나 중국과의 FTA에 비해 보다 긍정적인 후생증진을 가져올 것으로 기대되며, 아세안과 한중일 모두에게 A+3FTA가 동아시아 역내에서 보다 바람직한 자유무역협정이 될 것으로 평가된다.

• Korea Trade Review
• /
• v.41 no.1
• /
• pp.139-158
• /
• 2016

In this study, we analyze South Korea and China have already concluded FTA rules of origin. By comparison and analysis of the relevant provisions in the country of origin of signed FTA, we obtained the necessary implications of origin on the FTA negotiations that will be concluded in the future. FTA between Korea and China's opening level is much lower than the already concluded FTA's, and Korea and the ASEAN FTA has already been signed with similar concessions. However, in understanding the rules of origin in China, it is important for us that China is the first trading partner of the trade. Korean companies are well aware of the rules of origin in China, and it should be noted to prevent damage caused due to the rules of origin in the process of expanding trade with the Contracting Parties.

• International Commerce and Information Review
• /
• v.13 no.3
• /
• pp.143-166
• /
• 2011

This paper describes the characteristics and outline of rules of origin among Korea and USA, EU, ASEAN. The main focus of this paper is to conduct comparative analysis on rules of origin. Rules of origin are used to determine the country of origin of a product for purposes of international trade. There are two common types of rules of origin depending upon application, the preferential and non-preferential rules of origin Non-preferential rules of origin are used to determine the country of origin for certain purposes. The basis for the non-preferential rules originates from the Kyoto convention which states that if a product is wholly obtained or produced completely within one country the product shall be deemed having origin in that country. For a product which has been produced in more than one country, the product shall be determined to have origin in the country where the last substantial transformation took place. To determine exactly what was the last substantial transformation, three general rules are applied : Change of tariff classification(on any level, though 4-digit level is the most common), Value added-rule.(ad-valorem), and Specific process rule. While criteria of wholly obtained or produced in one country is almost similar to those of theses area and countries, in compliance with value percentages of Substantial Transformation, sufficient working or processing, Korea-US FTA adapts 'Regional Value Content', meanwhile Korea-EU FTA adapts 'Import Content' rule. Finally, Korea-US FTA and ASEAN FTA adapt FOB price for the calculation value added, on the other hand Korea-EU FTA adapts EXW price.