• Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management
• /
• v.8 no.1
• /
• pp.235-255
• /
• 2008

Present study conducted surveys and interviews to identify a solution to the issues concerning the work conditions, job satisfaction, and operational systems of archivists working in the Korean government agencies. Job characteristics were measured using the five-factor structures of Hackman and Oldham's(1976) Job Characteristic Models, professionalism, role conflict, stress, and turnover intentions. Job environment was measured in terms of communication, participation, social relations with coworkers and superiors, and job training. Job satisfaction was measured by general level of satisfaction, job meaningfulness, and commitment. Operational systems was analyzed in terms of organizational arrangement, role assignment, personnel management, and collaboration between the national archives and record centers. These analyses produced further implications and suggestions on personnel management of archivists and records managers.

• The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
• /
• no.37
• /
• pp.145-188
• /
• 2013

The purpose of production status report is figuring out the amount of records produced by departments and record centers and establishing plans for transfer and collect of archives. These are the main functions of production status report clarified by Public Records Management Act. Production status report is introduced as the means to control the record management in public institutions which lack the understanding of the record production and management. Up to now, public institutions carry out production status report. However, it only has been done as a formal procedure and records collected unsurely transfer to Archives. The implementation of production status report does not accord with the original purpose. In addition, there are different views about the appropriateness of production status report. Record managers in the field, the researchers who made efforts to state production status report in the law and the archives did not reached the agreement of opinions yet. The objective of this study is not to judge whether production status report is of importance or not. Although its significance is controversial, it's one of the most important record management tasks and it stands the position as the distinct method in Korea. Nonetheless, the issue that production status report lacks efficiency in the field due to the lack of support of forms and systems brings up continuously. Thus, I evaluated current functions of production status report and proposed future improvements so that it accomplishes its original intent and support users in the field.

• The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
• /
• no.63
• /
• pp.71-114
• /
• 2020

The Records Disposal Freeze Program will be introduced in June 2020 with the revision of the Public Records Act of South Korea. In the study, the issues of the program were identified through the analysis of domestic cases and the programs of other countries, and the improvement plans on the issues were suggested. For the analysis of the programs, seven factors which should be presented to implement the program were derived from the notices of disposal freeze by National Archives of Australia. Based on the factors, the programs were analyzed; the programs of South Korea, the United States of America, United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand. As a result of analysis and comparison of the programs, five issues of Korean program were derived. The experts interviews were conducted to understand the perception and the perspective on the program of records managers and archivists. The improvement plans for the program of South Korea were suggested based on the analysis and comparison of the programs of five countries and experts interviews.

• The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
• /
• no.6
• /
• pp.309-312
• /
• 2002

• Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management
• /
• v.20 no.1
• /
• pp.159-175
• /
• 2020

This study aims to discuss policy alternatives for improving the curriculum of archival studies. As a theoretical study, it organized classical professional theories such as Greenwood and Good and confirmed that the archival professionals met all six criteria for professional occupations claimed by Perk. However, from the perspective that professionalism is not completed at any point in time, but is a constant pursuit, education and training of archival professionals, and the legal system that supports it, were analyzed. In addition, the case of the British ARA and the US ACA, which are implementing a professional certification system, was analyzed in the context that professionals should set their own standards for education and training to protect their authority and have norms for professional communities. In conclusion, policy alternatives centered on the academic training guidelines and the certification system were presented.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Disaster Information Conference
• /
• 2023.11a
• /
• pp.191-192
• /
• 2023

본 연구는 재난안전법 제 69조의 재난원인조사의 자산화를 통한 재난관리 업무 연속성을 위한 방안으로 표준화 등 개선이 필요하다. 현재 「재난안전법」제69조와 동법 시행령 제75조의3 및 동법 시행규칙 제19조의5에는 재난원인조사에 대한 내용이 예비조사부터 본조사 등 구체적으로 명시하고 있다. 과학적 재난관리를 위해서는 과거의 재난관리에 대한 기록이 풍부하게 존재해야 이를 바탕으로 AI 등을 활용할 수 있다. 재난관리 기록을 통하여 과거를 거울삼아 미래를 예측하고 현재의 재난관리를 효과적이고 효율적으로 할 수 있다. 재난관리 사례를 자산화하기 위해서는 가장 먼저 현재의 법과 제도의 개선이 필요하다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 법과 제도의 개선에 중점을 두어 진행 하고자 한다.

• The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
• /
• no.35
• /
• pp.231-239
• /
• 2013

외국 정부가 공여한 기록관리 프로젝트를 통해 몽골 기록분야가 발전했다. 이 글은 외국의 기여에 의한 기록프로젝트의 내용과 결과를 소개한다. 몽골은 20세기에 들어와서 마이크로 필름제작을 통한 기록보존 등 외국의 발달된 기록보존제도를 성공적으로 받아들였다. 몽골민주화 이전에는 러시아와 동독의 공헌이 있었으며, 민주화 이후 일본, 중국 등으로부터 기록보존 장비를 지원받았다. 1990년대 후반 이후 정보통신기술의 미비로 인한 곤란을 겪었으며, ICA와 EASTICA에 참여하는 국제협력활동을 통해 기록관리 선진 지식과 국제표준을 접하고 이를 번역하여 기록관리 업무에 활용했다. 2006년에 한국 KOICA로부터 지원받아 디지털아카이브즈 프로젝트를 수행했다. 이 KOICA 지원프로젝트는 주로 장비를 지원했으며 외국이 지원한 몽골기록관리분야의 최대 프로젝트였다. 2010년에는 KOICA의 의회기록프로젝트가 수행되었다. 내각기록은 터키정부의 협력으로 대규모 디지털화프로젝트가 수행되었다. 외국정부의 지원에 의한 기록프로젝트는 몽골정부의 기록관리 정보화 계획과 이행으로 이어지고 있다.

• Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management
• /
• v.15 no.3
• /
• pp.169-191
• /
• 2015

The purpose of this study is to examine the driving forces and main contents of the reform of the records and archives management system in Japan from the 2009 enactment of the Public Records and Archives Management Act. The key essentials of the reform can be explained in two ways. First is through the legal system, a multilayer structure of the law and guidelines to the institutional documents management regulations for an effective application to each administrative institution. The other is the Public Records and Archives Management Commission, a deliberative body that guarantees the rigorous application and enforcement of the rules and regulations. One of the remarkable outcomes from the reform is the compulsory creation of minutes of the countermeasure meetings in government agencies related to the Great East Japan Earthquake Disaster, as well as the various significant cabinet meetings through a revision of the Guidelines for Public Administrative Records Management. In addition, the new construction of the National Archives of Japan and its meaning have been examined. It is being pushed ahead, with the active support of the ruling party members, through activities such as research and review meetings for improving the functions and facilities of the National Archives of Japan.

• The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
• /
• no.56
• /
• pp.5-48
• /
• 2018

The main factors for successful records management are the organization and human resources, and the responsibilities and authority that are assigned to them. Therefore, the innovation of public records management should include i) redefining the role of records management institutions to meet the requirements of professional standards, ii) improving organizational setup and staffing policies, and eliminating the legal obstacles. This paper aims to suggest the innovation tasks above areas for strengthening the expertise of each type of public records institution. The tasks are presented in four categories, such as the records centers, local archives, institutional archives of legislative body and Judicial authorities, and professionalism and ethics. Based on parts of the Public Records Management Innovation TF(2017.9-2017.12) report, it is rearranged considering the pending issues and reflecting the opinions of the record managers in public sectors to reinforce the basis for setting the tasks.

• Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management
• /
• v.21 no.1
• /
• pp.1-18
• /
• 2021

Korea's public institutions produce mandatory production records under the "Public Records Management Act" and submit statistics on production status to the National Archives of Korea every year. However, there is a difference between the actual status of compulsory records produced by local governments and the status statistics submitted to the Archives. Based on this, an improvement plan was proposed after identifying problems with the production management system of the production obligation records. In particular, the scope of the production obligation records is ambiguous, and the person in charge lacks an understanding of the specific scope. In addition, only certain work-oriented records are being produced. As such, the improvement plan shall clearly determine the target of the local government's production obligation records, and the person in charge of the affairs shall understand it and implement an ordinance on the production and management of the local government's production obligation records.