• Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction
• /
• v.17 no.4
• /
• pp.385-391
• /
• 2017

The warranty liability period for defects in apartment buildings by work type is not based on scientific analysis, making the appropriateness of the term a culprit behind the lawsuits. Therefore, this research aims to evaluate the appropriateness of the warranty liability term of apartment buildings by identifying the current status of defects, in particular, caused by finishing works. That is because the number of defects, caused during the finishing works, accounted for the largest portion of the total defect cases of apartment buildings reported to the Apartment Defect Dispute Mediation Committee under the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport of Korea between 2010 and 2011. The result from analyzing claims for defect repairs of the finishing works showed that most cases by work type continued to be made after two years, and only about 60% were charged within the warranty period. And, defects by work type have correlation, which needs to be considered for a better construction technique. Considering a low correlation between the possibility of defects and the construction performance rankings, which are highly relevant to the apartment preference. It is believed that there needs to be a qualification process for agencies that actually performs finishing works.

• KIEAE Journal
• /
• v.12 no.3
• /
• pp.11-18
• /
• 2012

The purpose of this study is to contribute to solution of the defect dispute in apartment house in advance. We want to propose the improved devices in defect problems by investigating the money that exacted from the practical business of the inspection company and the money that a judge gave a decision in a civil court in 50 cases of the lawsuit to requesting the guarantee against defects and the improved schemes of the applied rate by analyzing the diagnosis money of each applied years about the term of warranty liability in 40 cases of the lawsuit separately from that. As the result, we have to reflect the defect of non construction and error construction on apartment building defects, which recognizes very important factor when we compute the defect repair warranty money and it needs to be rearranged the applied ratio in guarantee peried of housing law practically.

• Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.11 no.2
• /
• pp.35-38
• /
• 2010

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction
• /
• v.22 no.1
• /
• pp.103-114
• /
• 2022

In the area of construction defects, residents have a tendency to focus on visually identifiable defects, while construction companies focus on defects that affect the structural and functional integrity of apartment housing. Accordingly, construction companies and residents have conflicting views on defects in apartment housing. To address this issue, this study aimed to accurately identify the main disputes surrounding defects in multi-family housing complexes or multi-dwelling unit apartment housing caused by such sharply different perspectives and suggest improvement measures. First, standards to determine different defects and remuneration standards between the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport and the court were analyzed. Then, problems were derived through an analysis of defects in past court cases, and the differences in perspectives between construction companies and residents were identified based on defect data from various construction companies. To tackle these issues, a classification measure for establishing a defect database for multi-family homes was also proposed.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction
• /
• v.7 no.2 s.24
• /
• pp.67-76
• /
• 2007

The purpose of this study is to propose the efficient improvement in the lawsuit to request the guarantee against defect. This study points out several problems about related act and subordinate statue and judgement by analyzing the character of contract in apartment house, related laws and regulations, appraisals and judicial decisions. This study deduces the necessity of the establishment of the specification and the breakdown cost for repair and maintenance work to provide the standard for the detached judgement.

• Venture DIGEST
• /
• no.2 s.127
• /
• pp.56-57
• /
• 2009

어느날 저녁 귀가 후 잠자리에 들 준비를 하고 있는데 예전에 알고 지냈던 S사장님이 전화를 하셨다. 격 없이 지내던 사이지만 시계는 11시를 가리키고 있었고 목소리도 뭔가 대단히 화가 나 있었다. 전화 내용은 이러했다. 국제특송으로 영국서 6만 원짜리 물건을 받았는데 운임이 물건 값의 두 배인 12만 원이 나왔다는 거다. 한 밤중에 전화기를 들만도 하다. 보통 운임이 물건 값을 넘게 되면 물건을 받는 사람은 화부터 난다. 그런데 막상 따지고 싶어도 운임으로 청구된 금액이 무엇인지를 몰라 답답하기 일수다. 이번 호에서는 운임의 구성에 대해 살펴보기로 하자.

• Journal of Arbitration Studies
• /
• v.24 no.4
• /
• pp.147-175
• /
• 2014

In contracts for the international sale of goods, a seller must deliver appropriate goods and hand over relevant documents according to a contract, which will transfer the ownership of the goods to a buyer. In this case, if there are defects in the contracted goods, the warranty liability will occur. However, in the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG), a term-the conformity of the goods to the contract-is used universally instead of the warranty. According to the CISG, a seller must deliver goods in conformance with the relevant contract in terms of quantity, quality, and specifications, and they must be contained in vessels or in packages according to the specifications in the contract. In addition, a certain set of requirements for conformity will be applied implicitly except when there is a separate agreement between parties. Further, the base period of conformity concerning the defects of goods is the point when the risk is transferred to the buyer. A seller shall be obliged to deliver goods that do not belong to a third party or subject to a claim then, and such obligations shall affect the right or claim of a third party to some extent based on intellectual property rights clauses. If the goods delivered by the seller lack conformity, or incur right infringement or claim of a third party, then it shall be regarded as a default item per the obligation of the seller. Thus, the buyer can exercise diverse means of relief as specified in Chapter 2, Section 3 (Article 45-Article 52) of the CISG. However, such means of relief have been utilized in various ways for individual cases as shown in judicial precedents made until now. Contracting parties shall thus keep in mind that it is best for them to make every contract airtight and they should implement each contract thoroughly and faithfully to cope with any possible occurrence of a commercial dispute.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction
• /
• v.21 no.2
• /
• pp.129-139
• /
• 2021

Recent rise in the supply rate of new public apartment houses leads to an increasement in disputes regarding the construction quality of the apartments between the residents and the construction companies. According to the dispute cases filed for claiming the collective defect repair fees, inter-layer concrete joints turned out to be the most frequently disputed item. For this reason, this study selects the inter-layer concrete joints to further analyze the primary causes and details of each dispute case. From the results of this study, three primary causes of the disputes are found, which are 1) the absence of standard specifications for construction quality control and management after construction; 2) the absence of established standards for repair when construction defects are found; and 3) the fact that the court grants generous compensation for disputes concerning the apartment houses. In order to prevent construction defects in inter-layer concrete joints, this study provides three suggestions including 1) the current standard specifications for inter-layer concrete joints should be further specified by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport; 2) a construction defect should be judged according to the compliance to the standard specifications; and 3) a clear and institutional protocol needs to be established for defect repair in cases that new public apartment houses have been judged to have defects.

• Proceedings of the Korea Contents Association Conference
• /
• 2006.05a
• /
• pp.322-326
• /
• 2006

There are the road of the artificial government property and rivers of the natural government property in representative Public Facilities applied National Reimbursement Law. Art.5. Doctrine on Responsibility of Public Facilities. Recently damage of a people has frequently been occurring caused by the flood of rivers and the flood disaster, and a people tends to request national reimbursement regarded it not as a natural disaster but as a man-made disaster. Especially the flood repeatedly occurred by the flood of rivers and destructive of the embankment of rivers, and it is also occurring in repairing rivers. Therefore a nation have to take responsibility of compensation for damage because of defect of conservation of rivers, and pay attention to improving the facilities of conservation and at the same time expand the range of responsibility. Thus the range of this study limits the national reimbursement of conservation of rivers among National Reimbursement Law. Art.5. Compensation for Damages on Defect about an Establishment and Management of public Facilities. Within this range, the objection of this study is to seek controversial issues and solutions, which belong with national reimbursement responsibility about conservation of rivers, as every principle of law and precedent coming under natural government property about compensation for damages caused by defect of conservation of rivers is analyzed and examined.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2011.05a
• /
• pp.100-100
• /
• 2011

2011년 1월 약 5년에 걸쳐 공방을 이어오던 서울시와 한국수자원공사(수공)와의 물값 분쟁 사례에 대한 대법원의 판결이 내려졌다. 서울시는 댐용수 사용료로 지불한 약 677억에 대한 부당이득금 반환 청구소송을 제기하였고, 이에 대하여 수공은 한강 취수장 물값 114억원을 청구하는 소송을 제기하였다. 결론적으로 대법원은 수공의 손을 들어줌으로서 기나긴 물값 분쟁 사례의 종지부를 찍었다. 본 사례는 대법원이 하천점용허가의 본질을 언급하는 등 향후 물값 관련 분쟁이 발생하는 경우 중요한 선례로 기능하게 될 것이다. 본 연구는 기득수리권 물량의 허용범위에 대하여 2011년 대법원 판결을 중심으로 분석하였다. 기득수리물량의 총합으로 용수료를 계산하고자 한 서울시의 주장에 대하여 각 취수장별 계약량 산정을 주장한 한국수자원공사의 논리에 대하여 대전지방법원 및 대법원의 판결을 중심으로 법적인 분석을 시도하였다. 특히, "민법" 제104조에서 규정하고 있는 '불공정한 법률행위'를 통하여 서울시와 수자원공사 간의 계약상의 하자에 대하여 분석하였다. 수리권과 관련하여 물값 분쟁에 대한 명확한 지침을 제시하는 판례를 찾기는 쉽지 않다. 민법 상의 기득수리권 규정과 하천법 상의 허가수리권 규정이 충돌하면서 명확한 법적인 해석이 곤란한 실정이다. 선서례구속의 의미에서도 본 대법원 판결은 중요한 의미를 가진다고 할 수 있다. 따라서 본 사례에 대한 상세하고 지석적인 분석을 통하여 우리나라 수리권 제도를 재 규명하기 위한 이론적인 토대로 삼는 것이 중요하다고 할 수 있다. 판결문을 중심으로 사례연구를 수행한 본 연구는 다음 두 가지 점에서 의의를 가진다. 첫째는 '공익성'이 높은 물값에 대한 객관적인 판단을 가능하게 하였다는 점, 그리고 둘째는 실질적인 물값 제도개선을 위한 중요한 선행연구로서의 가치를 가진다는 점이다.