• The korean journal of orthodontics
• /
• v.30 no.1 s.78
• /
• pp.91-99
• /
• 2000

This study was done to identify the changes of bite force and occlusal contact between before and after stabilization splint therapy. 16 female patients, accepted for orthodontic treatment at the Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chosun University, were selected as the sample of this investigation. For comparisons, the samples of 16 were divided into just before stabilization splint, 1 month after stabilization splint, 2 months after stabilization splint, and 3 months after stabilization splint and used the T-scan system to identify the bite force and occlusal contact changes for each group. Statistical analysis of the data was carried out ANOVA tests, and Turkey tests using $SPSS/PC^+$. The results were as follows : 1. Bite force change from just before treatment to 1 month after stabilization splint therapy was statistical significantly decreased (P<0.05). 2. Bite force changes from 1 to 3 months after stabilization splint therapy showed no statistical significance (p>0.05). 3. The changes of anterior occlusal contacts showed no statistical significance regardless of the wearing periods of stabilization splint (P>0.05). 4. The changes of posterior occlusal contacts from just before treatment to 1 month after stabilization splint therapy was statistical significantly decreased (P<0.05). 5. The changes of posterior occlusal contacts Outing 1 to 3 months after stabilization splint therapy showed no statistical significance (P>0.05). 6. Posterior teeth rather than anterior teeth were more influenced by the changes of the number of occlusal contacts. To sum up above results, we may respect to capturing and stabilizing centric relation Position just 1 month after stabilization splint therapy.

• Journal of Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
• /
• v.20 no.2
• /
• pp.299-313
• /
• 1990

The author analysed tomographic and cephalometric radiographs of 82 temporomandibular joints from 41 symptomatic patients and 40 temporomandibular joints from 20 asymptomatic young adults. The results were as follows; 1. The mean condylar angulation in control group and patient group was 21.72±6.48° 20.13±9.14° respectively and there was no significant difference between two groups. 2. The mean depth of cut was 6.63±0.38㎝ in control group and 6.57±0.46㎝ in patient group. 3. Mean height and width of condylar head were 6.66±1.83㎜, 12.42±0.49㎜ in control group and 6.22±1.36㎜, 11.93±l.92㎜ in patient group. 4. The mean height of articular fossa was 10.20±2.04㎜ in control group and 9.89±1.98㎜ in patient group. The mean width of articular fossa was 21.08±2.08㎜ in control group and 21.24±3.03㎜ in patient group. 5. In centric occlusion the superior joint space was largest (4.15±0.93㎜), followed by the posterior joint space (2.99±0.97㎜) and the anterior joint space (2.70±0.73㎜) in control group. The superior joint space (3.47±1.31㎜) and posterior joint space (3.47±7.07㎜) were same in patient group. There was significant difference in left superior joint spaces between two groups (p<0.05). 6. The condylar position in articular fossa was displaced anteroinferiorly (0.99±3.65㎜ anteriorly, 1.75±1.01㎜ inferiorly) in control group and posteroinferiorly (3.20±4.69㎜ posteriorly, 1.25±1.87㎜ inferiorly) in patient group with 1 inch opening. In maximum opening, it was displaced anteroinferiorly (6.09±3.55㎜ anteriorly, 1.38±2.47㎜ inferiorly) in control group and anteroinferiorly (1.70±5.96㎜ anteriorly, 1.37±1.85㎜ inferiorly) in patient group. There was significant difference in anteroposterior position of both condyles with 1 inch opening and maximum opening between two groups (p<0.01). 7. The mean inclination of upper central incisor and the posterior inclination of articular eminence in control group was 65.60±6.04° 58.88±9.18° in control group, and 67.14±8.41°, 59.70±9.08° in patient group respectively. There was no significant correlation between two groups.

• The korean journal of orthodontics
• /
• v.22 no.1
• /
• pp.109-121
• /
• 1992

Temporomandibular joint is a major structure to play an important role in the function & stability of the occlusion as well as the stomatognathic system. Therefore, the TMJ is the structure that requires the complete analysis for diagnosing and planning treatment of pathologic changes by TMJ dysfunction and malocclusion. So, in this study, to evaluate TMJ situation in Korean malocclusion, based on the previous accomplishments, students of the dental college of Won-Kwang Univ. are surveyed and selected in terms of Angle's classification of malocclusion, whose TMJ radiographs were taken in the centric occlusion and centric relation. In each maiocclusion groups, the mean and standard deviation of anterior, posterior and superior joint space of the right, left and both side in CO & CR are evaluated and also those of the fossa height and the articular eminence angle of the right, left and both sides are evaluated. The obtained results were as follows: 1. In the correlation coefficient between the malocclusion groups, no other items except the posterior joint space of the right side in CR between in class I and class III are significant. 2. In the correlation coefficient between the right and left side, the each joint space in class I malocclusion group and class II malocclusion group are significant. 3. In the change of each joint space during the transmit from CO to CR, there is a tendency of increasing anterior joint space and decreasing posterior, superior joint spaces in class I, II malocclusion and increasing superior joint space and decreasing anterior, posterior joint space in class III malocclusion, which is significant in the correlation coefficient, but not significant in the T-test. 4. In each malocclusion group, the correlation coefficient between the posterior joint space and the superior joint space in C.R is highly significant. 5. The fossa height of class II malocclusion group is lesser than that of class I or class III, which is not significant in T-test. 6. In the correlation coefficient between Rt. and Lt. side in the fossa height, it is not significant in class I and class III group, but significant in class II malocclusion group. 7. The articular eminence angle of class II malocclusion group is larger then that of class I or class III groups, which is fairly significant. 8. In the correlation coefficient between Rt. and Lt. side in the articular eminence angle, it is significant in each malocclusion group.

• The korean journal of orthodontics
• /
• v.26 no.3
• /
• pp.255-265
• /
• 1996

The purpose of this study was to investigate if there were a significant difference between cephalometric measurements of mandibular position derived from a centric occlusion tracing compared to those of a converted centric relation tracing in the Class III malocclusion. The sample consisted of 25 Class III malocclusion and 25 normal occlusion persons who had no orthodontic treatment. The records included an lateral cephalometrics in centric occlusion, centric relation and centric occlusion bite registration and diagnostic casts mounted on the SAM II articulator in CR. The amount of CR-CO discrepancy of condyle was recorded using a MPI(Mandibular Position Indicator, MPI $200^{(R)}$, Great Lakes Orthodontics, USA). The conversion of the CO cephalogram to CR using the MPI readings was performed on the Conversion work sheet. Measures of mandibular position were chosen for the purpose of this study. The comparison of the difference between CO and CR cephalometric measurements in the normal occlusion and Class III malocclusion group were studied. The results were as follows: 1. In the features of CR-CO discrepancy of the condyle, the condyle was displaced posterior and inferior when the teeth were in centric occlusion. The horizontal component(${\Delta}X$) in Class HI malocclusion group was greater than the vertical component(${\Delta}Z$) and also greater than the horizontal component(${\Delta}X$) in normal occlusion group. There was no statistically significant correlation between MPI measurements and the groups of normal occlusion and Class III malocclusion group. 2. In the comparison of the cephalometric measurements in each group, Normal occlusion group showed significant difference in measurements such as ANB, Facial angle, Facial convexity and ODI. Class HI malocclusion group showed significant difference in measurements such as ANB, Facial angle, Facial convexity, ODI, SNB, APDI, L1-FP and it had more significance than the normal occlusion group. 3. The Value of cephalometric measurements was significantly different between CO and CR but there were no differences between the groups of normal occlusion and Class III malocclusion. The results of this study suggest that if the discrepancies are greater than the amount of normal displacement from clinically captured centric relation, centric relation should be considered as the starting point for proper diagnosis and treatment planning.