• 제목/요약/키워드: 픽앤홀드

검색결과 2건 처리시간 0.017초

솔레노이드 타입 디젤 커먼레일 인젝터 구동을 위한 전류 파형 변화에 따른 분사 연료 압력파 특성 (A Study on Characteristics of Injected Fuel Pressure Waves of a Solenoid Type Diesel Common Rail Injector with Controlling Current Wave for Driving the Injector)

  • 김길태;이충훈
    • 한국분무공학회지
    • /
    • 제21권3호
    • /
    • pp.155-161
    • /
    • 2016
  • Injected fuel pressure waves of a common rail injector with various current profiles supplied to the injecor were measured using Bosch method. In order to drive the common rail injector, the current in the solenoid should be controlled using what is known as a peak and hold pattern, which consists of a high current level with a short time duration (peak) in the first step and a low current level with a long time duration (hold) in the subsequent step. The current profile can be shaped by swithcing an injector driving power source with the peak and hold waves. The capture, compare and PWM (CCP) pin in the microprocessor was used to generate the combined peak and hold waves. The PWM square wave generated from the CCP pin has a duty ratio of 100% for the peak current and 10% or 30% for the hold pattern. Five patterns of the current profile were generated by combining the peak and hold wave. The common rail pressure is controlled at 75, 100, and 130 MPa. As the fuel rail pressure increases, the variations of the measured fuel injection pressure wave according to the current profiles decrease.

인젝터 구동 전류 패턴 변화가 솔레노이드 타입 커먼레일 인젝터 분사율 특성에 미치는 영향에 대한 컴퓨터시뮬레이션 (A Computer Simulation of Injection Rate Characteristics of Solenoid Type Common Rail Injector According to Injector Driving Current Patterns)

  • 이충훈
    • 한국분무공학회지
    • /
    • 제24권3호
    • /
    • pp.114-121
    • /
    • 2019
  • The effect of injector driving current pattern on fuel injection rate of solenoid diesel common rail injector was studied by computer simulation. The time resolved fuel injection rate and injected quantity per stroke of a common rail injector driven with the five current patterns were computer simulated. The fuel injection rate and injected quantity per stroke according to the rail pressure and fuel injection period were also computer simulated. When the common rail injector was driven with the five driving current patterns of peak & hold, there was no difference in the fuel injection rate in the peak section regardless of all the current patterns of the five cases. On the other hand, the magnitude of the hold current value influenced the injection rate and injected quantity per stroke. That is, in the current pattern of three cases where the hold current value is equal to or more than a constant value of the peak current value, the fuel injection rates for the given common rail rail pressure and injection period are same one another. On the other hand, the current pattern of the two cases, in which the hold current value is smaller than a certain value, there is a large fluctuation in the fuel injection rate.