• Proceedings of the Korean Radioactive Waste Society Conference
• /
• 2004.06a
• /
• pp.241-241
• /
• 2004

한국원자력연구소에서 발생되는 방사성폐기물은 다양한 형태, 다양한 핵종으로 구성되며 소량씩 불규칙한 시기에 발생하는 특성을 갖는다. 이러한 폐기물의 효율적인 관리와 처리를 위하여 체계적인 이력관리와 신속한 통계를 도출할 수 있는 데이터베이스 시스템 구축이 선행과제로 대두되었다. 이에 방사성폐기물 통합관리 시스템(Radioactive Waste Management Integration System ; RAWMIS)을 구축하였으며, 이 시스템은 방사성폐기물의 발생부터 수집, 이동, 처리, 저장 등 처분까지의 이력을 관리하고, 서류간소화 및 인적자원 절약 등의 관리효율성을 제고하여 구현되었다. 또한, 한국원자력안전기술원에서 추진하는 국가적 방사성폐기물 통합 안전관리 체계(Waste Comprehensive Information Database : WACID)와 연계를 할 수 있도록 연구개발의 착수 단계에서부터 공동으로 진행하였다. 본 논문에서는 구축된 시스템의 구현사항과 실제 방사성폐기물 관리에 활용하는 사항을 제시한다. 본 연구를 통하여 구축된 시스템은 방사성폐기물 발생기관의 관리와 처리에 있어서 투명성과 효율을 증가시키고, 정확하고 신속한 정보를 도출할 수 있으며, 방사성폐기물의 관리와 처리공정의 데이터를 확보하여 방사성폐기물 처리 분야 연구의 토대를 제공할 수 있다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Radioactive Waste Society Conference
• /
• 2011.10a
• /
• pp.67-68
• /
• 2011

• Proceedings of the Korean Radioactive Waste Society Conference
• /
• 2012.10a
• /
• pp.467-468
• /
• 2012

• Proceedings of the Korean Radioactive Waste Society Conference
• /
• 2003.11a
• /
• pp.283-289
• /
• 2003

In order to establish the licensing review system for LILW disposal facility, we have studied the licensing review structure of oversea's countries, including United State, Japan, and France. We have also reviewed the domestic licensing review structure and the current status of development of safety standards for LILW management. A licensing review for LILW disposal facility can be implemented in 5-6 steps according to Atomic Energy Act. It is estimated to take 32 months for the CP and the OL review for LILW disposal facility referencing to the licensing review practice of the nuclear power plant. To date, a total of 15 MOST Notices have been developed to apply to the safe management of radwaste and 5 more MOST Notices will be developed by 2005.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.15 no.3
• /
• pp.83-91
• /
• 2014

The problems of environmental pollutions and resources depletion have been growing issues in global construction recently. Efforts to reduce $CO_2$ emission have been also made in all sectors of construction industry these days. As one of the biggest industries that consume a huge amount of resources and generate complex construction wastes, the construction industry has significant impacts on environment issues. However, systematic approach to manage wastes has been rarely made, and most construction wastes from construction sites are being land-filled or incinerated. In this study, a system is proposed to predict the amount of wastes in visual formats, and to control the process of wastes management. The system's main functions include : (1) to estimate the amount of wastes to be generated in project schedule, (2) to categorize the types of wastes, (3) to determine the timing of taking out wastes from sites, and (4) to share information regarding wastes for recycling. A huge amount of wastes are generated in construction process, but most of the wastes have been discharged in forms of mixed wastes, which make them hardly reused. The system not only provide information on wastes to be generated, but also prevent mixing various wastes by classifying them by types and schedules. This features of the system, along with functions to share wastes information with other agencies outside the site, are expected to enhance the level of wastes recycling to a great extent. By saving construction materials through wastes recycling, the system also contributes in reducing $CO_2$ emission.

• 한국해양학회지
• /
• v.28 no.2
• /
• pp.137-141
• /
• 1993

폐기물의 특성상 유지에서 처리가 곤란하고 처리비용이 과다하게 소용되는 폐기물 을 지정된 해역에서 적정 처리방법에 따라 해양에 배출토록 허용하는 폐기물의 해양배 출 제도가 있다. 폐기물의 해양배출에 대한 법적근거는 국내법으로 해양오염방지법과 폐기물관리법, 수질환경보전법 그리고 오수, 분료 및 춘산폐수의 처리에 관한 법률이 있고 국제협약으로 폐기물 및 기타 물질의 투기에 의한 해양오염의 방지에 관한 협약 (일명 런던덤핑 협약:LDC-London Dumping Convention)이 있다. 여기서는 배출이 허용 된 폐기물의 종류 및 체계와 우리 나라 인근 해역에서의 폐기물의 해양배출 현황과 외 국의 해양배출 현황을 언급하고, 폐기물의 해양배출이 해양환경에 미칠 영향과 폐기물 의 해양배출에 대한 감시체계 그리고 배출해역 관리를 위한 배출해역에 대한 수질조사 에 대하여 언급하였다. 그리고 앞으로의 폐기물의 해양배출제도에 대한 국제적 동향과 향후의 전망을 언급하고, 우리 나라의 입장 및 정책방향에 대하여 언급하겠다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Radioactive Waste Society Conference
• /
• 2004.06a
• /
• pp.127-129
• /
• 2004

웹기반의 어플레케이션 설계 및 구축 과정에서의 핵심은 WACID 시스템의 서비스 목적을 이해하는 것이다. WACID 시스템의 서비스 목적은 국내 방사성폐기물 관리 요소 및 보고체계를 통합한다. 웹을 통한 대국민 방사성 폐기물 정보 공개에 대한 투명성을 제공하기 위함이다. 일반인 및 관련 종사자들에게 최상의 서비스 제공을 위한 신뢰성 있는 데이터를 제공한다. 친숙한 사용자인터페이스(User Interface)로 설계되었다. 단순한 방사성 폐기물 관리 요소 검색을 위한 웹기반 시스템이 아닌 방사성 폐기물과 관련된 이해를 돕기 위한 다양한 도구들을 제공한다.(중략)

• Journal of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology(JNFCWT)
• /
• v.1 no.1
• /
• pp.1-10
• /
• 2003

As a follow up to the Agenda 21's policy statement for safe management of radioactive waste adopted at Rio Conference held in 1992, the UN invited the LAEA to develop and implement indicators of sustainable development for the management of radioactive waste. The IAEA finalized the indicators in 2002, and is planning to calculate the member states' values of indicators in connection with operation of its Net-Enabled Waste Management Database system. In this paper, the basis for introducing the indicators into the radioactive waste management was analyzed, and calculation methodology and standard assessment procedure were simply depicted. In addition, a series of innate limitations in calculation and comparison of the indicators was analyzed. According to the proposed standard procedure, the indicators for a few major countries including Korea were calculated and compared, by use of each country's radioactive waste management framework and its practices. In addition, a series of measures increasing the values of the indicators was derived so as to enhance the sustainability of domestic radioactive waste management program.

• Journal of the Korea Organic Resources Recycling Association
• /
• v.23 no.3
• /
• pp.42-50
• /
• 2015

Beijing and Seoul are the capital of China and Korea, and political, economic, cultural, and tourist centers as well. Beijing is most likely to follow the footsteps of Seoul in the process of urbanization. The purpose of this study is to find out differences and improvements by comparing the solid waste management system between Beijing and Seoul. China classifies waste into urban waste, industrial waste and hazardous waste, which is the same as Korea did in 1980s. Beijing's policy directions in the waste management is similar to Seoul's in the early 1990s when Seoul strived to construct incinerators and landfill. Beijing's waste management achievements are also similar to Seoul's in that the ratio of recycling and incineration is high and that of landfill is low. Hence, it is expected for the waste management policies and achievement of two cities to resemble more and more. Financial burdens of government, indifference of citizens, and decentralized organizations of waste management might be the issues for Beijing to solve. In particular, to implement the user fee system and to encourage citizens to participate in waste separation discharge appear to be key issues in Beijing. Seoul should take a look at which the Beijing government itself collects waste in station and central area.

• Proceedings of the Korean Radioactive Waste Society Conference
• /
• 2004.11a
• /
• pp.27-28
• /
• 2004