• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.33 no.3
• /
• pp.133-152
• /
• 2002

The purpose of this study is to propose the criteria for evaluating web information resources. This study also attempts to get a sense of the overall quality of web information resources and to identify the relationship among the criteria, Particularly those on the science and technology. Three evaluation categories are Proposed; information content functionality or workability, and design. Core features of information content includes authority, relevancy, currency; functionality includes navigation, user support technical requirements; layout and design includes visual appearance. Based on the proposed criteria, the 50 sample web resources selected from 5 different field were evaluated. The results showed that the web information resources on the Electrical and Electronic Engineering field was excellent. The Pearson's correlation coefficient between evaluation criteria showed that information content and functionality had a negative relationship, on the other hand functionality and design had a moderate correlation.

• Convergence Security Journal
• /
• v.2 no.2
• /
• pp.137-142
• /
• 2002

When the Common Criteria(CC) for security system evaluation was put up, and the coming into the CCRA is promoted, the interest to the Evaluation Assurance Level(EAL) is greatly increasing. In this paper, via the comparison between the evaluation level of the exiting process evaluation criteria and the EAL of CC, the characteristics of the EAL of the CC are noted.

• Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society
• /
• v.36 no.4
• /
• pp.17-30
• /
• 2020

In this study, liquefaction evaluation was performed by applying liquefaction evaluation criteria commonly applied in Korea and recently revised evaluation criteria to five sites where liquefaction was observed or potential for liquefaction was high during the 2017 Pohang earthquake. The purpose of this study is to examine the validity of the revised domestic liquefaction evaluation criteria by comparing and reviewing the results of the theoretical liquefaction evaluation with the actual liquefaction occurrence at the sites. For the analysis of earthquakes for the evaluation of the liquefaction, the actual Pohang earthquake wave, as well as the waves that was conventionally used in Korea, was used. The magnitude of the peak ground acceleration of analysis earthquake varied from 0.097 g to 0.2713 g. From the analysis results, the validity of the liquefaction evaluation criteria presented in the 2016 Foundation Design Criteria, which has been commonly applied in Korea, was evaluated. From the evaluation results, the improvement of the existing criteria was suggested, and the suitability of revised items of liquefaction evaluation criteria presented in the Seismic Design General established in 2018 was confirmed.

• The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education
• /
• v.12 no.5
• /
• pp.63-74
• /
• 2009

In this study, the contents of the revised curriculum in 2007 for the area of 'Information Society and Information Technology' in 'Informatics subject matter for middle school have been analyzed. In addition, evaluation standards have been suggested based on the achievement standards, which have been detailed according to the analyzed results in the study. Since the suggested achievement and evaluation standards have been developed based on the revision of the curriculum, the results in this study are expected to be helpful especially in 2010 for teaching and learning activities such as setting up the educational objects for teaching and learning, developing evaluation methods, improving the teaching and learning methods, setting the level and range of teaching and learning area, and etc.

• The Korean Journal of Financial Studies
• /
• v.5 no.1
• /
• pp.19-47
• /
• 1999

본 연구는 기업가치 추정모형인 EVA모형과 FCFF모형의 적합성을 한국주식시장을 대상으로 검증하는데 목적을 두고 있다. 1992년$\sim$1996년의 5년간 상장기업을 대상으로 분석한 결과는 다음과 같다. 실제주가와 이론주가간에 음(-)의 괴리율을 갖는 집단의 누적평균초과수익률은 EVA 모형 기준인 경우 40일$\sim$60일간에 유의적으로 상승하고 있으며, FCFF모형의 경우 1일$\sim$20일간에 유의적으로 상승하고 있다. 그리고 실제주가와 이론주가간에 양(+)의 괴리율을 갖는 집단의 누적평균초과수익률은 EVA모형 기준인 경우 21일$\sim$40일간에 유의적으로 하락하고 있으며, FCFF모형 기준인 경우 1일$\sim$20일간에 유의적으로 하락하고 있다. 또한 EVA모형과 FCFF모형 모두에서 음(-)의 괴리율집단과 양(+)의 괴리율집단간의 누적평균초과수익률은 기준일 이후 유의적 차이를 보이고 있다. EVA모형과 FCFF모형으로 평가한 결과는 반영시점이 다소 차이가 난다는 점을 제외하고는 상대적으로 과소평가된 주식은 기준일 이후 가격이 상승하고 상대적으로 과대 평가된 주식은 기준일 이후 하락한다는 사실을 보여주고 있다. 이런 사실은 제한적이지만 절대가치평가모형이 한국주식시장에서 어느 정도 적합성을 가질 수 있는 가능성을 보여주고 있다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Institute of Fire Science and Engineering Conference
• /
• 2011.11a
• /
• pp.498-501
• /
• 2011

본 연구에서는 방염제가 적용되는 방염대상물에 대한 검정기술기준과 목조문화재에 적용되는 방염제의 검정기준의 차이에 대해 비교하여 보았으며 이를 통해 단청 등이 도색되어 있는 대부분의 목조문화재에 적용되는 방염제의 성능과 방염 처리되어진 일반 목재의 방염성능평가방법에 대하여 생각해 보았다. 목조문화재용 방염제 검정기준 내의 방염성 평가는 소방방재청 고시 제 2009-31호의 "방염제의 형식승인 및 검정기술기준"과 비교하였을 때 목재를 비교대상으로 할 경우 방염성능 기준 및 측정방법과 동일하거나 거의 유사하였으며 방염제의 물성 등에 대한 기본적인 평가방법 또한 동일한 것으로 나타났다. 그러나 시험시편에 대한 규정에 있어서 목조문화재용 시험편의 경우 일정 두께이하로 규정하고 있어 시험하는 시편의 두께에 따라 방염성능 평가기준에 도달하지 못하는 경우가 발생할 수 있을 것으로 판단되어진다.

• Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association
• /
• v.25 no.3
• /
• pp.61-77
• /
• 2013

Developing textbook evaluation criterion is as important as textbook development in education. Home economics subject has been involved in textbook evaluation since 1995, at which the first home economics textbook was under the national authorization system in South Korea. There has been little research on home economics textbook evaluation criterion even though there were more studies using textbook analysis. The purposes of this study were to explore the reason why subject perspectives were reflected on the textbook evaluation criterion, the relationships between the perspectives presented by national curriculum and technology home economics textbook evaluation criterion, and the future direction for developing textbook evaluation criterion. So this study was related to analyze practical arts(technology home economics) textbook evaluation criterion and the meaning of subject perspectives in textbook evaluation criterion, to drive perspectives consistently presented by the 2007 revised and 2011 revised national curriculum, to analyze the relationships between the perspectives in national curriculum and textbook evaluation criterion, and to provide the future direction for textbook evaluation criterion development. Textbook evaluation criterion is very important because it provides subject perspectives for developing textbook, delivers the core concepts and unique values of our subject, and provides the direction for teacher education. According to the analysis of both national curriculum, the perspectives such as management competency, life competency, practical experience, integrative competency for understanding individual and family, career and life planning, and life problem-solving were presented in this study. Implication for future research would be needed to develop the factors of textbook evaluation criterion based on the perspective presented by national curriculum.

• 주택과사람들
• /
• s.11
• /
• pp.84-87
• /
• 1991

[ $\circ$] 건설부는 지가공시 및 토지 등의 평가에 관한 법률 제19조의 규정에 의한 감정평가법인의 설립이 ''91.7.1부터 가능해짐에 따라 감정평가업계가 법인형태로 재편되도록 유도해 나갈 계획이다. $\cdot$ 이에 법인설립인가 기준인 감정평가사인 사원의 수를 조정하여 평가법인의 대형화$\cdot$전문화를 도모함으로써 평가업무의 전문성과 책임성을 확보하는 동시에 $\cdot$ 지방의 감정평가업 육성과 지방분산을 도모하기 위하여 수도권과 기타 지방 지역을 차등하여 기준을 설정키로 하였다. - 서울, 인천, 경기: 40인 이상, -기타 지역: 30인 이상.

• Korean Journal of Hospice Care
• /
• v.6 no.1
• /
• pp.100-107
• /
• 2006

본회 소속 호스피스 기관은 PETAFO 기준에 따라 자격 등급을 평가한다. 평가는 최초 가입 시와 가입 후 1년마다 정기적으로 시행하고, 등급은 호스피스 형태별로 평가 종합점수에 따라 구분한다. 평가기준은 시행년도에 따라 변동될 수 있다. 자격등급을 평가하는 목적은 첫째, 우리나라 특성에 맞는 최상의 활동이 각 호스피스 형태에 따라 일정하게 유지되고, 둘째로 세계보건기구가 요구하는 수준과 일치시킴으로써 세계가 인정하는 양질의 호스피스 활동을 펼쳐나가는데 있다. 평가방법은 아래 질문 형식에 따라 각 기관 대표자 명의로 답변서를 작성하고 관련 자료를 첨부하여 제출하면 서류심사 및 실사로 이루어진다. 평가결과는 본회 회보와 호스피스 관련 언론지를 통해 발표한다.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.18 no.5
• /
• pp.405-410
• /
• 2020

Professionalism, objectivity, and fairness are highly required in the assessment of tasks in national research and development projects. Experts in the technologies should thus focus on the task's plan in the review process. The same scores in the assessment, however, do not mean that the judges don't have the same opinions. Another problem is the possibility that different weights can be applied for evaluation indexes. This study proposed an AHP-based assessment criteria decision system for national research and development tasks to reduce errors in task assessment and selection and improve the professionalism and fairness by objectifying the evaluation criteria of each index. As a result, the assessment criteria were objectified for each index in the projects. In addition, the professionalism and fairness of experts were secured in the process of setting assessment criteria for each index based on the given marks of weights.