• Title/Summary/Keyword: 퍼팅 수행력

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.021 seconds

Comparison of Golf Putting Performance on Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (경두개직류자극 유뮤에 따른 골프 퍼팅 수행력 비교 분석)

  • Lee, Jae-Woo;Park, Jun-Sung
    • Journal of the Korean Applied Science and Technology
    • /
    • v.38 no.6
    • /
    • pp.1476-1484
    • /
    • 2021
  • The purpose of this study was to compare the golf performance on transcranial direct current stimulation(tDCS). Ten collegiate golfers were participated. SAMPutt basic unit was used to analyze the kinematic data of putter head. A putting platform and a tDCS were used for putting tasks. It was performed paired t-test to compare between before tDCS and after tDCS. A significant level of .05 using SPSS 24.0. Face at aim and backswing variables of putter head were significantly different during flat putting. Impact spot of putter head was significantly different during 2° of hook slope. However, there were not significantly different others slope angle. It was found that transcranial direct current stimulation had a positive effect on kinematic variables. Based on these results, further research is needed to confirm the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on body stability during putting task.

Biomechanics analysis by success and failure during golf putting swing (골프 퍼팅 스윙시 성공과 실패에 따른 운동역학적 분석)

  • Choi, Sung-Jin;Park, Jong-Jin
    • Korean Journal of Applied Biomechanics
    • /
    • v.12 no.2
    • /
    • pp.279-293
    • /
    • 2002
  • In the study the subjects who 10 university golfers act, and the kinetic factors were analyzed by the ground reaction system. the conclusion are as follows. 1) In the golf putting swing, the ground reaction factors of sagital plane in aspect are showen that the left and right foot sufficient difference, in the level of p <.05. 2) In the golf putting swing, the ground reaction factors of frontal plane in aspect is showen that the left foot has no significant difference in AD BS in the level of p < .05. In success, IP, FS. It can show significant difference. In addition, the right foot is shown the success, There is significant difference. 3) In the golf putting swing, the ground reaction factors of the vertical plane in aspect are shown that the left foot has no significant difference in BS, FS in the level p < .05. In success, AD, IP. It can show significant difference. In addition, the right foot is shown the success, There is significant difference. 4) In the golf putting swing, the ground reaction factors of torque in aspect are shown that the left foot had no significant difference in BS in the level p < .05. In success, AD, IP, FS. It can show significant difference. In addition, the right foot has no significant difference in IP in the level p < .05. AD, BS, FS. There is significant difference. The summarized conclusions are as follows. The first that the power of sagital plane needs the motion which can get the good power change in the stabilized pose. The second is that the small motion can make good putting in stabilized pose. The third is that the body weight move to the direction of the ball. The fourth is that the putting which looks perfect oscillation is good motion.