• Science & Technology Policy
• /
• v.8 no.1 s.106
• /
• pp.59-76
• /
• 1998

• Science & Technology Policy
• /
• v.7 no.12 s.105
• /
• pp.83-93
• /
• 1997

• Science & Technology Policy
• /
• v.7 no.5 s.98
• /
• pp.30-39
• /
• 1997

• Journal of Korean Electronics
• /
• v.4 no.9
• /
• pp.101-102
• /
• 1984

• Science & Technology Policy
• /
• v.7 no.10 s.103
• /
• pp.14-24
• /
• 1997

• JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL WORLD
• /
• no.8 s.152
• /
• pp.2-7
• /
• 1989

• Science & Technology Policy
• /
• v.7 no.8 s.101
• /
• pp.65-79
• /
• 1997

• 전기의세계
• /
• v.37 no.3
• /
• pp.32-35
• /
• 1988

본고에서는 화학개발분야의 우리나라 연구개발의 실적과 계획등에 관해 특히 정부의 특정연구사업을 중심으로 소개하고자 한다.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.12 no.3
• /
• pp.614-637
• /
• 2009

To enhance the efficiency of national R&D programs, it is the most important thing to establish the optimized evaluation system. This is because the distorted evaluation could be an obstacle to select the best suited research team and lead the desirable research result. In current evaluation process of national R&D program, it is the most frequently used method for eliminating an evaluator's biased view to exclude both the maximum and minimum scores. However, there are several limitations in this stereotype method. Therefore, this study analyzes some real cases to derive the problems from the stereotype method and then recommends the complementary alternatives which can enhance the reliability of the evaluation system for national R&D programs. The results acquired from this study seem to be helpful to increase the agreement of the applicants on the evaluation results and ultimately to maximize the efficiency of national R&D program. In addition, they can be applied to various field with respect to the methodology for ranking decision.

• The Science & Technology
• /
• v.23 no.9 s.256
• /
• pp.76-84
• /
• 1990