• Journal of Cadastre & Land InformatiX
• /
• v.45 no.1
• /
• pp.59-74
• /
• 2015

This study proposes a land action plan for stabilization of the North Korea in fundamental guarantees of life, social security and social system in order to minimize the social disruption and economic losses by identifying the administrative and operational status of the land in North Korea. Land action plan for North Korea is that the state holds the whole land ownership for a certain period through re-nationalization of the land by not admitting the former owner's ownership and distributes the land to the currently occupying personal and set the land use permission and later land ownership will be introduced and land use permit will be gradually privatized.

• Journal of Legislation Research
• /
• no.53
• /
• pp.61-107
• /
• 2017

It has been seventy-two years since the Korean Peninsular was divided into South and North Korea. When Korea was liberated from Japanese colonial rule in August 1945, the South and North established a capitalist system and a socialist system (communism) respectively, intensifying the ideological conflict and confrontation. The division of Korea was not confined to political and economical aspects, but extended to legal system, making it difficult to find legislative homogeneity in the two. The long-term situation of the divided nation results in a social phenomenon accompanied by legal division. For instance, shortly after its liberation from Japan's colonial rule, North Korea responded quickly to secure legal stability to govern the northern part while the Soviet army troops were stationed in it. Based on Marx and Engels' historical materialism, the North drove a change in its ideological superstructure by repealing the privatization of land property which was the means of production and finally enforced land nationalization, in common with other socialist states including the former Soviet Union. The North's land reform made under the guise of fulfilling national independence and doing away with anti-seigneurial and anti-feudalistic relations, has led to a wide difference in the systems between the South and Korea. This paper focuses on the legal systems of South and North Korea and is aimed at exploring the legal characteristics and environment of the North which became secluded from the world while engaging in socialist experiments for the past seventy two years against capitalism. Ongoing studies of legal system integration will be briefly discussed. The legal status of South and North Korea as a political entity will be investigated to overcome legal system division; and the characteristics of South-North relationship in legal terms and the limitations of the North's legal system will be also examined. Moreover, the directions for integrating legal systems and the plan for resolving legal system division will be suggested.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2011.05a
• /
• pp.112-112
• /
• 2011

2010년 12월 8일 국회 본회의에서 "친수구역 활용에 관한 특별법"(이하 친수법)이 통과되었다. 친수법은 국가하천의 양안 2km 이내의 지역을 엄격한 기준에 의해 친수구역으로 지정하여 체계적으로 개발하도록 제도화하였다. 또한 특히 사업시행자를 공기업 및 지방자치단체 등 공공기관으로 제한하고 개발이익도 하천정비에 재투입하여 개발이익이 사유화되거나 이윤추구의 장이 되지 않도록 하는 법적 토대를 마련하고 있다. 우리나라의 하천은 지난 수십 년간 개발일변도 정책으로 하천 본래의 모습을 찾기 어렵다. 인구의 도시집중, 지속적인 개발, 하천에 대한 기대치 증가 등으로 앞으로도 하천 자체의 자정능력에 의한 회복은 기대하기가 쉽지 않다. 4대강 살리기 사업(이하 4대강사업)은 국내 하천의 이러한 절실한 현실이 고려되었다고 한다. 그런데 4대강사업으로 조성되는 수변지역을 그대로 방치하면 무분별한 난개발과 토지투기의 장으로 전락할 가능성이 크다. 또한 수변구역 주변의 넓은 토지는 이미 농경지화되어 있어 비료, 제초제 등 비점오염원의 하천유입으로 수질을 지속적으로 위협하고 있다. 이러한 제반 여건들이 친수법 제정의 주요한 동기가 되었다고 한다. 그러나 친수법의 제정에는 수많은 우여곡절이 포함되어 있다. 친수법은 법안이 발의된 이래 법안의 취지를 둘러싸고 향후 법 실행과 관련된 논의가 첨예하게 대립하여왔다. 본 연구는 이미 제기된 특별법의 문제점에 대하여 법적인 관점에서 짚어보고, 그에 따른 개선방안을 모색해 보고자 한다. 친수법의 제정을 위하여 꼭 특별법이라는 입법과정을 거쳐야 했는지 그리고 친수법이 상정하고 있는 사업의 성격 및 내용에 대한 법적인 타당성을 살펴보고자 한다. 또한 친수법 제4장에서 규정하고 있는 하천관리기금을 법률 구성의 입장에서 어떻게 파악할 수 있는지에 관한 점도 고찰하였다. 즉, 친수법이 구상하고 있는 [특별법의 제정${\rightarrow}$친수구역 개발에 의한 수익 창출${\rightarrow}$하천기금의 조성${\rightarrow}$건전한 하천관리]의 구도가 법적으로 어느 정도 균형과 조화를 이룰 수 있는지 고찰하였다.

• Land and Housing Review
• /
• v.3 no.3
• /
• pp.241-248
• /
• 2012

Although infrastructure cost comprises the great proportion of residential development cost, all of it tends to be borne by land developers which develop large area. This brings about free-riding by adjacent small development or built-up area, followed by the equity problem in terms of infrastructure development cost sharing and the privatization of development gain. This study aims to establish the method to analyze free-riding on the transportation infrastructure(roads) and investigate empirically how much the free-riding occurs. It sets several development scenarios to calculate the part generated by Bucheon Sangdong district, the case area of this study, of all the traffic flow on the roads. The Network analysis is used to estimate the proportion, by development scenarios, of traffic flow, travel time, and travel cost. As a result, the developer of Bucheon Sangdong district is responsible for 83% of the construction cost of selected roads. The methodology and empirical result of this study would contribute to determine who are liable for the infrastructure facilitation and to estimate how much of the cost the obligators have to share.

• Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment
• /
• v.32 no.4
• /
• pp.242-250
• /
• 2023

The continuity of urban space is being destroyed by disorderly high-rise development caused by reckless development, and the resulting deterioration of urban landscape is emerging as a major problem. Disordered high-rise development is adversely affecting the urban environment, such as depriving residents of the basic rights of view and sunlight and privatizing the scenery that urban residents should enjoy together. In order to create a continuous urban landscape, indiscriminate high-rise development is restricted and compensation for the affected areas is needed. Various regulations have been carried out to this end, but it is difficult to overcome the pressure and damage to high-rise development by regulations alone. Accordingly, discussions have been underway to introduce a compensation system. Among them, discussions on the introduction of a 'Transfer of Development Right' (TDR) in which land ownership and development rights are separated and compensated for development rights have been drawing attention. However, in Korea, it is difficult to introduce the system due to various problems related to the separation of development rights. In order to overcome the limitations of the introduction of TDR, this paper analyzed the concepts and characteristics of 'Real Estate Investment Trusts' (REITs) and presented a policy model for the development right transfer system incorporating REITs for effective landscape management.