• Title/Summary/Keyword: 텐서플로

Search Result 7, Processing Time 0.024 seconds

Implementation of Seed Germination Confirmation System with Deep Learning (딥 러닝을 활용한 씨앗 발아 확인 시스템)

  • Gim, U Ju;Kwon, Min Seo;Lee, Jae Jun;Yoo, Kwan Hee;Hong, Jang-Eui;Nasridinov, Aziz
    • Proceedings of the Korea Information Processing Society Conference
    • /
    • 2018.10a
    • /
    • pp.603-605
    • /
    • 2018
  • 최근 대두되고 있는 딥 러닝은 학습을 통해 사물이나 데이터를 군집화하거나 분류하는 데 사용하는 기술이다. 본 논문은 딥 러닝에 활용하기 위해 개발된 오픈소스 소프트웨어인 텐서플로 Inception V3을 사용해 연구를 진행했다. 딥 러닝을 활용한 씨앗 발아 확인 시스템은 기존의 영상 처리를 활용한 시스템에서 고안했으며, 씨앗 발아 여부의 정확성이 떨어지는 단점을 개선하고, 모든 종자들의 발아 여부를 확인할 수 있도록 구현해 사용자가 효과적으로 연구를 수행할 수 있도록 하는 목적에 있다.

Comparison of Deep Learning Frameworks: About Theano, Tensorflow, and Cognitive Toolkit (딥러닝 프레임워크의 비교: 티아노, 텐서플로, CNTK를 중심으로)

  • Chung, Yeojin;Ahn, SungMahn;Yang, Jiheon;Lee, Jaejoon
    • Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems
    • /
    • v.23 no.2
    • /
    • pp.1-17
    • /
    • 2017
  • The deep learning framework is software designed to help develop deep learning models. Some of its important functions include "automatic differentiation" and "utilization of GPU". The list of popular deep learning framework includes Caffe (BVLC) and Theano (University of Montreal). And recently, Microsoft's deep learning framework, Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit, was released as open-source license, following Google's Tensorflow a year earlier. The early deep learning frameworks have been developed mainly for research at universities. Beginning with the inception of Tensorflow, however, it seems that companies such as Microsoft and Facebook have started to join the competition of framework development. Given the trend, Google and other companies are expected to continue investing in the deep learning framework to bring forward the initiative in the artificial intelligence business. From this point of view, we think it is a good time to compare some of deep learning frameworks. So we compare three deep learning frameworks which can be used as a Python library. Those are Google's Tensorflow, Microsoft's CNTK, and Theano which is sort of a predecessor of the preceding two. The most common and important function of deep learning frameworks is the ability to perform automatic differentiation. Basically all the mathematical expressions of deep learning models can be represented as computational graphs, which consist of nodes and edges. Partial derivatives on each edge of a computational graph can then be obtained. With the partial derivatives, we can let software compute differentiation of any node with respect to any variable by utilizing chain rule of Calculus. First of all, the convenience of coding is in the order of CNTK, Tensorflow, and Theano. The criterion is simply based on the lengths of the codes and the learning curve and the ease of coding are not the main concern. According to the criteria, Theano was the most difficult to implement with, and CNTK and Tensorflow were somewhat easier. With Tensorflow, we need to define weight variables and biases explicitly. The reason that CNTK and Tensorflow are easier to implement with is that those frameworks provide us with more abstraction than Theano. We, however, need to mention that low-level coding is not always bad. It gives us flexibility of coding. With the low-level coding such as in Theano, we can implement and test any new deep learning models or any new search methods that we can think of. The assessment of the execution speed of each framework is that there is not meaningful difference. According to the experiment, execution speeds of Theano and Tensorflow are very similar, although the experiment was limited to a CNN model. In the case of CNTK, the experimental environment was not maintained as the same. The code written in CNTK has to be run in PC environment without GPU where codes execute as much as 50 times slower than with GPU. But we concluded that the difference of execution speed was within the range of variation caused by the different hardware setup. In this study, we compared three types of deep learning framework: Theano, Tensorflow, and CNTK. According to Wikipedia, there are 12 available deep learning frameworks. And 15 different attributes differentiate each framework. Some of the important attributes would include interface language (Python, C ++, Java, etc.) and the availability of libraries on various deep learning models such as CNN, RNN, DBN, and etc. And if a user implements a large scale deep learning model, it will also be important to support multiple GPU or multiple servers. Also, if you are learning the deep learning model, it would also be important if there are enough examples and references.

Performance Comparison Analysis of AI Supervised Learning Methods of Tensorflow and Scikit-Learn in the Writing Digit Data (필기숫자 데이터에 대한 텐서플로우와 사이킷런의 인공지능 지도학습 방식의 성능비교 분석)

  • Jo, Jun-Mo
    • The Journal of the Korea institute of electronic communication sciences
    • /
    • v.14 no.4
    • /
    • pp.701-706
    • /
    • 2019
  • The advent of the AI(: Artificial Intelligence) has applied to many industrial and general applications have havingact on our lives these days. Various types of machine learning methods are supported in this field. The supervised learning method of the machine learning has features and targets as an input in the learning process. There are many supervised learning methods as well and their performance varies depends on the characteristics and states of the big data type as an input data. Therefore, in this paper, in order to compare the performance of the various supervised learning method with a specific big data set, the supervised learning methods supported in the Tensorflow and the Sckit-Learn are simulated and analyzed in the Jupyter Notebook environment with python.

Prediction of Wave Breaking Using Machine Learning Open Source Platform (머신러닝 오픈소스 플랫폼을 활용한 쇄파 예측)

  • Lee, Kwang-Ho;Kim, Tag-Gyeom;Kim, Do-Sam
    • Journal of Korean Society of Coastal and Ocean Engineers
    • /
    • v.32 no.4
    • /
    • pp.262-272
    • /
    • 2020
  • A large number of studies on wave breaking have been carried out, and many experimental data have been documented. Moreover, on the basis of various experimental data set, many empirical or semi-empirical formulas based primarily on regression analysis have been proposed to quantitatively estimate wave breaking for engineering applications. However, wave breaking has an inherent variability, which imply that a linear statistical approach such as linear regression analysis might be inadequate. This study presents an alternative nonlinear method using an neural network, one of the machine learning methods, to estimate breaking wave height and breaking depth. The neural network is modeled using Tensorflow, a machine learning open source platform distributed by Google. The neural network is trained by randomly selecting the collected experimental data, and the trained neural network is evaluated using data not used for learning process. The results for wave breaking height and depth predicted by fully trained neural network are more accurate than those obtained by existing empirical formulas. These results show that neural network is an useful tool for the prediction of wave breaking.

Artificial intelligence (AI) parking control solution using CCTV to solve multi-family housing parking problems (다세대주택 주차 문제 해소를 위한 CCTV를 활용한 인공지능(AI) 주차관제 솔루션)

  • Choi, Kyu-Min;Kim, Yu-Min;Shin, Jun-Pyo;Kim, Jung-Hyeon;Kwak, Min-Hyuk;Kim, Byung-Wan;Lee, Byong-Kwon
    • Proceedings of the Korean Society of Computer Information Conference
    • /
    • 2021.07a
    • /
    • pp.273-275
    • /
    • 2021
  • 본 논문에서는 기존 스마트주차관제 시스템의 한계로 인해 주차 관제의 사각지대에 있는 다세대 주택 주차 문제를 해결하는 솔루션을 제안한다. 기존 스마트 주차관제는 센서 기반의 고비용의 장비 및 시공비가 소요되며, 이러한 특성으로 인해 다세대 주택에 적용이 어렵다. 해당 문제를 해결하기 위해 본 논문은 기존 설비인 CCTV를 활용한 스마트 주차 관제 시스템을 제안하며, 해당 솔루션은 텐서플로 cnn중 알씨엔엔 RPN을 적용하여 차량 객체 인식 및 주차 공간 객체 인식을 구현하였으며, 다세대 주택 주변 CCTV 영상을 OpenCV를 활용하여 능동적이며 저비용의 스마트 주차 관제 방식을 구현하였으며 CCTV의 특성상 외곡되는 이미지를 OpenCV 이미지 변형을 통해 외곡 이미지를 복원하여 인식률을 높였다.

  • PDF

A Deep Learning Performance Comparison of R and Tensorflow (R과 텐서플로우 딥러닝 성능 비교)

  • Sung-Bong Jang
    • The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology
    • /
    • v.9 no.4
    • /
    • pp.487-494
    • /
    • 2023
  • In this study, performance comparison was performed on R and TensorFlow, which are free deep learning tools. In the experiment, six types of deep neural networks were built using each tool, and the neural networks were trained using the 10-year Korean temperature dataset. The number of nodes in the input layer of the constructed neural network was set to 10, the number of output layers was set to 5, and the hidden layer was set to 5, 10, and 20 to conduct experiments. The dataset includes 3600 temperature data collected from Gangnam-gu, Seoul from March 1, 2013 to March 29, 2023. For performance comparison, the future temperature was predicted for 5 days using the trained neural network, and the root mean square error (RMSE) value was measured using the predicted value and the actual value. Experiment results shows that when there was one hidden layer, the learning error of R was 0.04731176, and TensorFlow was measured at 0.06677193, and when there were two hidden layers, R was measured at 0.04782134 and TensorFlow was measured at 0.05799060. Overall, R was measured to have better performance. We tried to solve the difficulties in tool selection by providing quantitative performance information on the two tools to users who are new to machine learning.

Development of Heat Demand Forecasting Model using Deep Learning (딥러닝을 이용한 열 수요예측 모델 개발)

  • Seo, Han-Seok;Shin, KwangSup
    • The Journal of Bigdata
    • /
    • v.3 no.2
    • /
    • pp.59-70
    • /
    • 2018
  • In order to provide stable district heat supplying service to the certain limited residential area, it is the most important to forecast the short-term future demand more accurately and produce and supply heat in efficient way. However, it is very difficult to develop a universal heat demand forecasting model that can be applied to general situations because the factors affecting the heat consumption are very diverse and the consumption patterns are changed according to individual consumers and regional characteristics. In particular, considering all of the various variables that can affect heat demand does not help improve performance in terms of accuracy and versatility. Therefore, this study aims to develop a demand forecasting model using deep learning based on only limited information that can be acquired in real time. A demand forecasting model was developed by learning the artificial neural network of the Tensorflow using past data consisting only of the outdoor temperature of the area and date as input variables. The performance of the proposed model was evaluated by comparing the accuracy of demand predicted with the previous regression model. The proposed heat demand forecasting model in this research showed that it is possible to enhance the accuracy using only limited variables which can be secured in real time. For the demand forecasting in a certain region, the proposed model can be customized by adding some features which can reflect the regional characteristics.