• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Information and Commucation Sciences Conference
• /
• 2002.05a
• /
• pp.598-601
• /
• 2002

In this research, robustness of image watermarking mixed Key and Logo scheme was evaluated. A personal ID of a copyrighter was key and watermark was logo image. The standard images of Baboon, Cameraman and Lena were used for experimental images, binary image‘Park’of 32$\times$32 and 64$\times$64 size were used for the watermark image, respectively. for robustness evaluation of the watermark, reconstructive rates of the watermark were obtained from images inserted watermark with image transformation or JPEG lossy compression. The experimental results show that the reconstructive rates of the case of 32$\times$32 watermark was better than the case of the 64$\times$64 watermark; average 5.9%, 13.9%, 6.5%, and 4.2% in the case of scale-down rates, rotational rates, impulse noise power density, and JPEG lossy compression rates, respectively.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering
• /
• v.6 no.3
• /
• pp.464-469
• /
• 2002

In this research, nonvisibility and robustness of image watermarking mixed Key and Logo method were evaluated. The role of the Key was performed by a personal ID of a copyrighter and the logo images were used as the watermark. The standard image of Lena was used for experimental image and binary images of `Park'with size 32${\times}$32 and 64${\times}$64 were used for the watermark, respectively In order to evaluate nonvisibility of the proposed watermarking scheme, PSNR(Peak Signal to Noise Ratio) of the watermarked image was obtained and for robustness reconstructive rates of the reconstructed watermark were obtained from the watermarked image with image transformation of JPEG lossy compression. The experimental results show that nonvisibility is excellent as PSNR of the watermarked image is 93.75dB and the reconstructive rates of the case of 322${\times}$32 watermark was better than the case of the 64${\times}$64 watermark; average 5.9%, 13.9%, 6.5%, and 4.2% in the case of scale-down rates, rotational rates, impulse noise power density, and JPEG lossy compression rates, respectively.